BACKGROUND: Many industrialized countries have introduced human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination of young women, but vaccine uptake often remains suboptimal. This study aimed to investigate whether a social media site like Facebook is an appropriate tool to assess knowledge, attitude and uptake related to HPV vaccination in young women in Germany. METHODS: Between December 2012 and January 2013 two different targeting strategies were implemented on Facebook, providing a link to an online questionnaire. Advertisements were displayed to female Facebook users aged 18-25 years living in Germany. During the simple targeting strategy, advertisements comprised health-related images along with various short titles and text messages. During the focused strategy, advertisements were targeted to users who in addition had certain fashion brands or pop stars listed on their profiles. The targeting strategies were compared with respect to participant characteristics. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify factors associated with HPV vaccine uptake. RESULTS: A total of 1161 women participated. The two targeting strategies resulted in significant differences regarding educational status and migrant background. Overall, awareness of HPV was high, but only 53% received at least one vaccine dose. In multivariate analysis, HPV vaccine uptake was independently associated with a physician's recommendation and trust in vaccine effectiveness. Concerns of adverse effects were negatively associated with vaccine uptake. DISCUSSION: Social network recruitment permits fast and convenient access to young people. Sample characteristics can be manipulated by adjusting targeting strategies. There is further need for promoting knowledge of HPV vaccination among young women. Physicians have a major role in the vaccination decision-making process of young women.
BACKGROUND: Many industrialized countries have introduced human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination of young women, but vaccine uptake often remains suboptimal. This study aimed to investigate whether a social media site like Facebook is an appropriate tool to assess knowledge, attitude and uptake related to HPV vaccination in young women in Germany. METHODS: Between December 2012 and January 2013 two different targeting strategies were implemented on Facebook, providing a link to an online questionnaire. Advertisements were displayed to female Facebook users aged 18-25 years living in Germany. During the simple targeting strategy, advertisements comprised health-related images along with various short titles and text messages. During the focused strategy, advertisements were targeted to users who in addition had certain fashion brands or pop stars listed on their profiles. The targeting strategies were compared with respect to participant characteristics. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify factors associated with HPV vaccine uptake. RESULTS: A total of 1161 women participated. The two targeting strategies resulted in significant differences regarding educational status and migrant background. Overall, awareness of HPV was high, but only 53% received at least one vaccine dose. In multivariate analysis, HPV vaccine uptake was independently associated with a physician's recommendation and trust in vaccine effectiveness. Concerns of adverse effects were negatively associated with vaccine uptake. DISCUSSION: Social network recruitment permits fast and convenient access to young people. Sample characteristics can be manipulated by adjusting targeting strategies. There is further need for promoting knowledge of HPV vaccination among young women. Physicians have a major role in the vaccination decision-making process of young women.
Entities:
Keywords:
CI, confidence interval; HPV, human papillomavirus; OR, odds ratio; cross-sectional study; hr, high-risk; human papillomavirus; recruitment strategy; social media site; targeting advertisement; uptake; vaccine
Authors: Sharon J M Kessels; Helen S Marshall; Maureen Watson; Annette J Braunack-Mayer; Rob Reuzel; Rebecca L Tooher Journal: Vaccine Date: 2012-04-03 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Susanne K Kjaer; Gabrielle Breugelmans; Christian Munk; Jette Junge; Michael Watson; Thomas Iftner Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2008-10-15 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Gina S Ogilvie; Valencia P Remple; Fawziah Marra; Shelly A McNeil; Monika Naus; Karen L Pielak; Thomas G Ehlen; Simon R Dobson; Deborah M Money; David M Patrick Journal: CMAJ Date: 2007-12-04 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Yeshe Fenner; Suzanne M Garland; Elya E Moore; Yasmin Jayasinghe; Ashley Fletcher; Sepehr N Tabrizi; Bharathy Gunasekaran; John D Wark Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2012-02-01 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Stefanie J Klug; Marianne van der Sande; Martin Terhardt; Fred Zepp; Marianne Röbl-Mathieu; Jörg Meerpohl; Miriam Wiese-Posselt; Thomas Harder; Ole Wichmann; Anja Takla Journal: Urologe A Date: 2018-11 Impact factor: 0.639
Authors: Alberto E Tozzi; Francesco Gesualdo; Angelo D'Ambrosio; Elisabetta Pandolfi; Eleonora Agricola; Pierluigi Lopalco Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2016-03-08
Authors: Bach Xuan Tran; Phung Tat Quoc Than; Tien Thuy Ngoc Doan; Huong Lan Thi Nguyen; Hue Thi Mai; Trang Huyen Thi Nguyen; Huong Thi Le; Carl A Latkin; Melvyn Wb Zhang; Roger Cm Ho Journal: Patient Prefer Adherence Date: 2018-05-30 Impact factor: 2.711
Authors: Louise Thornton; Philip J Batterham; Daniel B Fassnacht; Frances Kay-Lambkin; Alison L Calear; Sally Hunt Journal: Internet Interv Date: 2016-04-27
Authors: Esther O Oluwole; Oluwaseun M Idowu; Adebola A Adejimi; Mobolanle R Balogun; Gbemisola E Osanyin Journal: J Family Med Prim Care Date: 2019-11-15