OBJECTIVE: To determine the electrocochleographic characteristics of ears with superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD) and to examine its use for intraoperative monitoring in canal occlusion procedures. STUDY DESIGN: Case series. SETTING: Academic medical center. PATIENTS: Thirty-three patients (45 ears) had clinical and computed tomographic evidence of SSCD; 8 patients underwent intraoperative electrocochleography (ECoG) during superior canal occlusion; 9 patients underwent postoperative ECoG after SSCD occlusion. INTERVENTIONS: Diagnostic, intraoperative, and postoperative extratympanic ECoG; middle fossa or transmastoid occlusion of the superior semicircular canal. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Summating potential (SP) to action potential (AP) ratio, as measured by ECoG, and alterations in SP/AP during canal exposure and occlusion. RESULTS: Using computed tomography as the standard, elevation of SP/AP on ECoG demonstrated 89% sensitivity and 70% specificity for SSCD. The mean SP/AP ratio among ears with SSCD was significantly higher than that among unaffected ears (0.62 versus 0.29, p < 0.0001). During occlusion procedures, SP/AP increased on exposure of the canal lumen (mean change ± standard deviation, 0.48 ± 0.30). After occlusion, SP/AP dropped below the intraoperative baseline in most cases (mean change, -0.23 ± 0.52). All patients experienced symptomatic improvement. All patients who underwent postoperative ECoG 1 to 3 months after SSCD repair maintained SP/AP of 0.4 or lesser. CONCLUSION: These findings expand the differential diagnosis of abnormal ECoG. In conjunction with clinical findings, ECoG may support a clinical diagnosis of SSCD. Intraoperative ECoG facilitates dehiscence documentation and allows the surgeon to confirm satisfactory canal occlusion.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the electrocochleographic characteristics of ears with superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD) and to examine its use for intraoperative monitoring in canal occlusion procedures. STUDY DESIGN: Case series. SETTING: Academic medical center. PATIENTS: Thirty-three patients (45 ears) had clinical and computed tomographic evidence of SSCD; 8 patients underwent intraoperative electrocochleography (ECoG) during superior canal occlusion; 9 patients underwent postoperative ECoG after SSCD occlusion. INTERVENTIONS: Diagnostic, intraoperative, and postoperative extratympanic ECoG; middle fossa or transmastoid occlusion of the superior semicircular canal. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Summating potential (SP) to action potential (AP) ratio, as measured by ECoG, and alterations in SP/AP during canal exposure and occlusion. RESULTS: Using computed tomography as the standard, elevation of SP/AP on ECoG demonstrated 89% sensitivity and 70% specificity for SSCD. The mean SP/AP ratio among ears with SSCD was significantly higher than that among unaffected ears (0.62 versus 0.29, p < 0.0001). During occlusion procedures, SP/AP increased on exposure of the canal lumen (mean change ± standard deviation, 0.48 ± 0.30). After occlusion, SP/AP dropped below the intraoperative baseline in most cases (mean change, -0.23 ± 0.52). All patients experienced symptomatic improvement. All patients who underwent postoperative ECoG 1 to 3 months after SSCD repair maintained SP/AP of 0.4 or lesser. CONCLUSION: These findings expand the differential diagnosis of abnormal ECoG. In conjunction with clinical findings, ECoG may support a clinical diagnosis of SSCD. Intraoperative ECoG facilitates dehiscence documentation and allows the surgeon to confirm satisfactory canal occlusion.
Authors: Angela Wenzel; Bryan K Ward; Eva K Ritzl; Sergio Gutierrez-Hernandez; Charles C Della Santina; Lloyd B Minor; John P Carey Journal: Otol Neurotol Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 2.311
Authors: Bryan K Ward; Angela Wenzel; Eva K Ritzl; Sergio Gutierrez-Hernandez; Charles C Della Santina; Lloyd B Minor; John P Carey Journal: Otol Neurotol Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 2.311
Authors: Mira E Ossen; Robert Stokroos; Herman Kingma; Joost van Tongeren; Vincent Van Rompaey; Yasin Temel; Raymond van de Berg Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2017-07-24 Impact factor: 4.003
Authors: Bryan K Ward; Raymond van de Berg; Vincent van Rompaey; Alexandre Bisdorff; Timothy E Hullar; Miriam S Welgampola; John P Carey Journal: J Vestib Res Date: 2021 Impact factor: 2.354