Literature DB >> 23644303

Near-dehiscence: clinical findings in patients with thin bone over the superior semicircular canal.

Bryan K Ward1, Angela Wenzel, Eva K Ritzl, Sergio Gutierrez-Hernandez, Charles C Della Santina, Lloyd B Minor, John P Carey.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether patients with thin bone over the superior semicircular canal can develop signs or symptoms of superior canal dehiscence syndrome (SCDS). STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective case series.
SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: All patients from our institution found to have thin but not frankly dehiscent bone over the superior canal despite symptoms and signs of SCDS. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Preoperative CT imaging, symptoms, audiometry, vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMP), and intraoperative electrocochleography (ECochG) results were reviewed. Symptoms were assessed at least 1 month postoperatively in all patients, and postoperative physiologic data are presented when available.
RESULTS: Ten patients (11 ears) had thin bone over the superior semicircular canal at surgery. All presented with autophony or sound- and/or pressure-induced vertigo, in addition to at least 1 physiologic measure consistent with SCDS. CT imaging was read as showing either dehiscence (36%) or marked thinning of bone overlying the affected canal (64%). Preoperative median low-frequency air-bone gap (ABG) was elevated (10.9 dB; interquartile range [IQR], 8.8-12.5), with 4 patients demonstrating negative bone conduction thresholds. Patients had elevated oVEMP amplitude (median, 20.7; IQR, 6.7-22.1) μV and ECochG SP/AP ratios (median, 0.59; IQR, 0.54-0.67). Postoperative ABG and SP/AP ratio decreased significantly compared with preoperative values (p < 0.05), and all patients reported symptomatic improvement.
CONCLUSION: Symptoms typical of SCDS can occur in cases with thin but not dehiscent bone. Surgical plugging or resurfacing can reduce symptoms in such cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23644303      PMCID: PMC3740012          DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e318287efe6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  31 in total

1.  Dehiscence or thinning of bone overlying the superior semicircular canal in a temporal bone survey.

Authors:  J P Carey; L B Minor; G T Nager
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2000-02

2.  New and revised reporting guidelines from the Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium. American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation, Inc.

Authors:  E M Monsell
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.497

3.  Symptoms and signs in superior canal dehiscence syndrome.

Authors:  L B Minor; P D Cremer; J P Carey; C C Della Santina; S O Streubel; N Weg
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.691

4.  Dehiscence of bone overlying the superior canal as a cause of apparent conductive hearing loss.

Authors:  Lloyd B Minor; John P Carey; Phillip D Cremer; Lawrence R Lustig; Sven-Olrik Streubel; Michael J Ruckenstein
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  Tympanic electrocochleography for diagnosis of Menière's disease.

Authors:  R H Margolis; D Rieks; E M Fournier; S E Levine
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1995-01

6.  Myogenic potentials generated by a click-evoked vestibulocollic reflex.

Authors:  J G Colebatch; G M Halmagyi; N F Skuse
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 10.154

7.  Hearing outcomes after surgical plugging of the superior semicircular canal by a middle cranial fossa approach.

Authors:  Bryan K Ward; Yuri Agrawal; Elena Nguyen; Charles C Della Santina; Charles J Limb; Howard W Francis; Lloyd B Minor; John P Carey
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  Clinical, experimental, and theoretical investigations of the effect of superior semicircular canal dehiscence on hearing mechanisms.

Authors:  John J Rosowski; Jocelyn E Songer; Hideko H Nakajima; Kelly M Brinsko; Saumil N Merchant
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  CT evaluation of bone dehiscence of the superior semicircular canal as a cause of sound- and/or pressure-induced vertigo.

Authors:  Clifford J Belden; Noah Weg; Lloyd B Minor; S James Zinreich
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  High-resolution CT findings suggest a developmental abnormality underlying superior canal dehiscence syndrome.

Authors:  Timo P Hirvonen; Noah Weg; S James Zinreich; Lloyd B Minor
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.494

View more
  18 in total

1.  [Indications for operative therapy of vestibular vertigo and the associated success rates].

Authors:  M Westhofen
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Clinical and Physiologic Predictors and Postoperative Outcomes of Near Dehiscence Syndrome.

Authors:  Michael Baxter; Colin McCorkle; Carolina Trevino Guajardo; Maria Geraldine Zuniga; Alex M Carter; Charles C Della Santina; Lloyd B Minor; John P Carey; Bryan K Ward
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 3.  Clinical utility of ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (oVEMPs).

Authors:  Konrad P Weber; Sally M Rosengren
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 5.081

4.  The effect of superior canal dehiscence size and location on audiometric measurements, vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials and video-head impulse testing.

Authors:  Andrea Castellucci; Gianluca Piras; Valeria Del Vecchio; Francesco Maria Crocetta; Vincenzo Maiolo; Gian Gaetano Ferri; Angelo Ghidini; Cristina Brandolini
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Ménière's: why its diagnosis calls for more careful evaluation.

Authors:  Philippa Thomson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Why no Unilateral Vestibular Atelectasis?

Authors:  Benjamin T Crane
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  The Efficacy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Diagnosis of Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence.

Authors:  Fatma Beyazal Çeliker; Abdulkadir Özgür; Metin Çeliker; Mehmet Beyazal; Arzu Turan; Suat Terzi; Mehmet Fatih İnecikli
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 1.017

8.  Comorbidities confounding the outcomes of surgery for third window syndrome: Outlier analysis.

Authors:  P Ashley Wackym; Heather T Mackay-Promitas; Shaban Demirel; Gerard J Gianoli; Martin S Gizzi; Dale M Carter; David A Siker
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-08-22

9.  Power reflectance as a screening tool for the diagnosis of superior semicircular canal dehiscence.

Authors:  Gabrielle R Merchant; Christof Röösli; Marlien E F Niesten; Mohamad A Hamade; Daniel J Lee; Melissa L McKinnon; Cagatay H Ulku; John J Rosowski; Saumil N Merchant; Hideko Heidi Nakajima
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 10.  Rare Disorders of the Vestibular Labyrinth: of Zebras, Chameleons and Wolves in Sheep's Clothing.

Authors:  Julia Dlugaiczyk
Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 1.057

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.