Stacy C Bailey1, Rachel O'Conor2, Elizabeth A Bojarski2, Rebecca Mullen2, Rachel E Patzer3,4, Daniel Vicencio5, Kara L Jacobson4, Ruth M Parker3, Michael S Wolf2. 1. Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. 2. Health Literacy and Learning Program, Division of General Internal Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine at Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA. 3. Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA. 4. School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA. 5. Mercy Hospital and Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Age and race-related disparities in technology use have been well documented, but less is known about how health literacy influences technology access and use. OBJECTIVE: To assess the association between patients' literacy skills and mobile phone ownership, use of text messaging, Internet access, and use of the Internet for health-related purposes. METHODS: A secondary analysis utilizing data from 1077 primary care patients enrolled in two, multisite studies from 2011-2013. Patients were administered an in-person, structured interview. RESULTS: Patients with adequate health literacy were more likely to own a mobile phone or smartphone in comparison with patients having marginal or low literacy (mobile phone ownership: 96.8 vs. 95.2 vs. 90.1%, respectively, P < 0.001; smartphone ownership: 70.6 vs. 62.5 vs. 40.1%, P < 0.001) and to report text messaging (78.6 vs. 75.2 vs. 53.1%, P < 0.001). They were also more likely to have access to the Internet from their home (92.1 vs. 74.7 vs. 44.9%, P < 0.001) and to report using the Internet for email (93.0 vs. 75.7 vs. 38.5%, P < 0.001), browsing the web (93.9 vs. 80.2 vs. 44.5%, P < 0.001), accessing health information (86.3 vs. 75.5 vs. 40.8%, P < 0.001), and communicating with providers (54.2 vs. 29.8 vs. 13.0%, P < 0.001). Relationships remained significant in multivariable analyses controlling for relevant covariates. CONCLUSIONS: Results reveal that literacy-related disparities in technology access and use are widespread, with lower literate patients being less likely to own smartphones or to access and use the Internet, particularly for health reasons. Future interventions should consider these disparities and ensure that health promotion activities do not further exacerbate disparities.
BACKGROUND: Age and race-related disparities in technology use have been well documented, but less is known about how health literacy influences technology access and use. OBJECTIVE: To assess the association between patients' literacy skills and mobile phone ownership, use of text messaging, Internet access, and use of the Internet for health-related purposes. METHODS: A secondary analysis utilizing data from 1077 primary care patients enrolled in two, multisite studies from 2011-2013. Patients were administered an in-person, structured interview. RESULTS:Patients with adequate health literacy were more likely to own a mobile phone or smartphone in comparison with patients having marginal or low literacy (mobile phone ownership: 96.8 vs. 95.2 vs. 90.1%, respectively, P < 0.001; smartphone ownership: 70.6 vs. 62.5 vs. 40.1%, P < 0.001) and to report text messaging (78.6 vs. 75.2 vs. 53.1%, P < 0.001). They were also more likely to have access to the Internet from their home (92.1 vs. 74.7 vs. 44.9%, P < 0.001) and to report using the Internet for email (93.0 vs. 75.7 vs. 38.5%, P < 0.001), browsing the web (93.9 vs. 80.2 vs. 44.5%, P < 0.001), accessing health information (86.3 vs. 75.5 vs. 40.8%, P < 0.001), and communicating with providers (54.2 vs. 29.8 vs. 13.0%, P < 0.001). Relationships remained significant in multivariable analyses controlling for relevant covariates. CONCLUSIONS: Results reveal that literacy-related disparities in technology access and use are widespread, with lower literate patients being less likely to own smartphones or to access and use the Internet, particularly for health reasons. Future interventions should consider these disparities and ensure that health promotion activities do not further exacerbate disparities.
Authors: Steven H Belle; Louis Burgio; Robert Burns; David Coon; Sara J Czaja; Dolores Gallagher-Thompson; Laura N Gitlin; Julie Klinger; Kathy Mann Koepke; Chin Chin Lee; Jennifer Martindale-Adams; Linda Nichols; Richard Schulz; Sidney Stahl; Alan Stevens; Laraine Winter; Song Zhang Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2006-11-21 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Barry D Weiss; Mary Z Mays; William Martz; Kelley Merriam Castro; Darren A DeWalt; Michael P Pignone; Joy Mockbee; Frank A Hale Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2005 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Stacy Cooper Bailey; Lisa T Belter; Anjali U Pandit; Delesha M Carpenter; Eamon Carlos; Michael S Wolf Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2013-10-25 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Angela Starkweather; Cynthia S Jacelon; Suzanne Bakken; Debra L Barton; Annette DeVito Dabbs; Susan G Dorsey; Barbara J Guthrie; Margaret M Heitkemper; Kathleen T Hickey; Teresa J Kelechi; Miyong T Kim; Jenna Marquard; Shirley M Moore; Nancy S Redeker; Rachel F Schiffman; Teresa M Ward; Lynn S Adams; Karen A Kehl; Jeri L Miller Journal: J Nurs Scholarsh Date: 2019-09-30 Impact factor: 3.176
Authors: Stacy Cooper Bailey; Guisselle A Wismer; Ruth M Parker; Surrey M Walton; Alastair J J Wood; Amisha Wallia; Samantha A Brokenshire; Alexandra C Infanzon; Laura M Curtis; Mary J Kwasny; Michael S Wolf Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2017-08-18 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Nicole Meyers; Alexander F Glick; Alan L Mendelsohn; Ruth M Parker; Lee M Sanders; Michael S Wolf; Stacy Bailey; Benard P Dreyer; Jessica J Velazquez; H Shonna Yin Journal: Acad Pediatr Date: 2019-03-09 Impact factor: 3.107
Authors: Heather F Hunt; James R Rodrigue; Mary Amanda Dew; Randolph L Schaffer; Macey L Henderson; Randee Bloom; Patrick Kacani; Pono Shim; Lee Bolton; William Sanchez; Krista L Lentine Journal: Curr Transplant Rep Date: 2018-02-05
Authors: Sachiko M Oshima; Sarah D Tait; Samantha M Thomas; Oluwadamilola M Fayanju; Kearston Ingraham; Nadine J Barrett; E Shelley Hwang Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2021-06-09 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Zoe Moon; Mira Zuchowski; Rona Moss-Morris; Myra S Hunter; Sam Norton; Lyndsay D Hughes Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2021-07-08 Impact factor: 3.603