Marie-Pierre Gagnon1,2,3, Julie Payne-Gagnon2, Erik Breton4, Jean-Paul Fortin3, Lara Khoury5, Lisa Dolovich6, David Price6, David Wiljer7,8, Gillian Bartlett9, Norman Archer10. 1. Faculty of Nursing Science, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada. 2. DeGroote School of Business, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. 3. Research Centre of the CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada. 4. Centre de recherche sur les soins et les services de première ligne, Centre intégré de santé et services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec City, QC, Canada. 5. Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada. 6. Faculty of Law, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada. 7. Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. 8. Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. 9. Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada. 10. Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Healthcare stakeholders have a great interest in the adoption and use of electronic personal health records (ePHRs) because of the potential benefits associated with them. Little is known, however, about the level of adoption of ePHRs in Canada and there is limited evidence concerning their benefits and implications for the healthcare system. This study aimed to describe the current situation of ePHRs in Canada and explore stakeholder perceptions regarding barriers and facilitators to their adoption. METHODS: Using a qualitative descriptive study design, we conducted semi-structured phone interviews between October 2013 and February 2014 with 35 individuals from seven Canadian provinces. The participants represented six stakeholder groups (patients, ePHR administrators, healthcare professionals, organizations interested in health technology development, government agencies, and researchers). A detailed summary of each interview was created and thematic analysis was conducted. RESULTS: We observed that there was no consensual definition of ePHR in Canada. Factors that could influence ePHR adoption were related to knowledge (confusion with other electronic medical records [EMRs] and lack of awareness), system design (usability and relevance), user capacities and attitudes (patient health literacy, education and interest, support for professionals), environmental factors (government commitment, targeted populations) and legal and ethical issues (information control and custody, confidentiality, privacy and security). CONCLUSION: ePHRs are slowly entering the Canadian healthcare landscape but provinces do not seem well-prepared for the implementation of this type of record. Guidance is needed on critical issues regarding ePHRs, such as ePHR definition, data ownership, access to information and interoperability with other electronic health records (EHRs). Better guidance on these issues would provide a greater awareness of ePHRs and inform stakeholders including clinicians, decision-makers, patients and the public. In turn, it may facilitate their adoption in the country.
BACKGROUND: Healthcare stakeholders have a great interest in the adoption and use of electronic personal health records (ePHRs) because of the potential benefits associated with them. Little is known, however, about the level of adoption of ePHRs in Canada and there is limited evidence concerning their benefits and implications for the healthcare system. This study aimed to describe the current situation of ePHRs in Canada and explore stakeholder perceptions regarding barriers and facilitators to their adoption. METHODS: Using a qualitative descriptive study design, we conducted semi-structured phone interviews between October 2013 and February 2014 with 35 individuals from seven Canadian provinces. The participants represented six stakeholder groups (patients, ePHR administrators, healthcare professionals, organizations interested in health technology development, government agencies, and researchers). A detailed summary of each interview was created and thematic analysis was conducted. RESULTS: We observed that there was no consensual definition of ePHR in Canada. Factors that could influence ePHR adoption were related to knowledge (confusion with other electronic medical records [EMRs] and lack of awareness), system design (usability and relevance), user capacities and attitudes (patient health literacy, education and interest, support for professionals), environmental factors (government commitment, targeted populations) and legal and ethical issues (information control and custody, confidentiality, privacy and security). CONCLUSION: ePHRs are slowly entering the Canadian healthcare landscape but provinces do not seem well-prepared for the implementation of this type of record. Guidance is needed on critical issues regarding ePHRs, such as ePHR definition, data ownership, access to information and interoperability with other electronic health records (EHRs). Better guidance on these issues would provide a greater awareness of ePHRs and inform stakeholders including clinicians, decision-makers, patients and the public. In turn, it may facilitate their adoption in the country.
Authors: Cyrus K Yamin; Srinivas Emani; Deborah H Williams; Stuart R Lipsitz; Andrew S Karson; Jonathan S Wald; David W Bates Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2011-03-28
Authors: Srinivas Emani; Cyrus K Yamin; Ellen Peters; Andrew S Karson; Stuart R Lipsitz; Jonathan S Wald; Deborah H Williams; David W Bates Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2012-11-05 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Consuela C Yousef; Teresa M Salgado; Ali Farooq; Keisha Burnett; Laura E McClelland; Laila C Abu Esba; Hani S Alhamdan; Sahal Khoshhal; Ibrahim Aldossary; Omar A Alyas; Jonathan P DeShazo Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2022-02-09 Impact factor: 2.342
Authors: Gaby Anne Wildenbos; Frank Horenberg; Monique Jaspers; Linda Peute; Danielle Sent Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Date: 2018-11-21 Impact factor: 2.796