Literature DB >> 22071529

Detecting pregnancy use of non-hormonal category X medications in electronic medical records.

Brian L Strom1, Rita Schinnar, Joshua Jones, Warren B Bilker, Mark G Weiner, Sean Hennessy, Charles E Leonard, Peter F Cronholm, Eric Pifer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether a rule-based algorithm applied to an outpatient electronic medical record (EMR) can identify patients who are pregnant and prescribed medications proved to cause birth defects.
DESIGN: A descriptive study using the University of Pennsylvania Health System outpatient EMR to simulate a prospective algorithm to identify exposures during pregnancy to category X medications, soon enough to intervene and potentially prevent the exposure. A subsequent post-hoc algorithm was also tested, working backwards from pregnancy endpoints, to search for possible exposures that should have been detected. MEASUREMENTS: Category X medications prescribed to pregnant patients.
RESULTS: The alert simulation identified 2201 pregnancies with 16,969 pregnancy months (excluding abortions and ectopic pregnancies). Of these, 30 appeared to have an order for a non-hormone category X medication during pregnancy. However, none of the 30 'exposed pregnancies' were confirmed as true exposures in medical records review. The post-hoc algorithm identified 5841 pregnancies with 64 exposed pregnancies in 52,569 risk months, only one of which was a confirmed case.
CONCLUSIONS: Category X medications may indeed be used in pregnancy, although rarely. However, most patients identified by the algorithm as exposed in pregnancy were not truly exposed. Therefore, implementing an electronic warning without evaluation would have inconvenienced prescribers, possibly hurting some patients (leading to non-use of needed drugs), with no benefit. These data demonstrate that computerized physician order entry interventions should be selected and evaluated carefully even before their use, using alert simulations such as that performed here, rather than just taken off the shelf and accepted as credible without formal evaluation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22071529      PMCID: PMC3241158          DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2010-000057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  24 in total

1.  Computerized physician order entry: helpful or harmful?

Authors:  Robert G Berger; J P Kichak
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003-11-21       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Evaluating the capability of information technology to prevent adverse drug events: a computer simulation approach.

Authors:  James G Anderson; Stephen J Jay; Marilyn Anderson; Thaddeus J Hunt
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Prescribing safety features of general practice computer systems: evaluation using simulated test cases.

Authors:  Bernard Fernando; Boki S P Savelyich; Anthony J Avery; Aziz Sheikh; Mike Bainbridge; Pete Horsfield; Sheila Teasdale
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-05-15

4.  Improving residents' compliance with standards of ambulatory care: results from the VA Cooperative Study on Computerized Reminders.

Authors:  J G Demakis; C Beauchamp; W L Cull; R Denwood; S A Eisen; R Lofgren; K Nichol; J Woolliscroft; W G Henderson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-09-20       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Effect of computerized physician order entry and a team intervention on prevention of serious medication errors.

Authors:  D W Bates; L L Leape; D J Cullen; N Laird; L A Petersen; J M Teich; E Burdick; M Hickey; S Kleefield; B Shea; M Vander Vliet; D L Seger
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-10-21       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Assessing the accuracy of an inter-institutional automated patient-specific health problem list.

Authors:  Lise Poissant; Laurel Taylor; Allen Huang; Robyn Tamblyn
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 2.796

7.  Prescription drug use in pregnancy.

Authors:  Susan E Andrade; Jerry H Gurwitz; Robert L Davis; K Arnold Chan; Jonathan A Finkelstein; Kris Fortman; Heather McPhillips; Marsha A Raebel; Douglas Roblin; David H Smith; Marianne Ulcickas Yood; Abraham N Morse; Richard Platt
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Physicians' decisions to override computerized drug alerts in primary care.

Authors:  Saul N Weingart; Maria Toth; Daniel Z Sands; Mark D Aronson; Roger B Davis; Russell S Phillips
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2003-11-24

9.  Prescriptions for contraindicated category X drugs in pregnancy among women enrolled in TennCare.

Authors:  William O Cooper; Gerald B Hickson; Wayne A Ray
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.980

10.  Computerized physician order entry and medication errors in a pediatric critical care unit.

Authors:  Amy L Potts; Frederick E Barr; David F Gregory; Lorianne Wright; Neal R Patel
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 7.124

View more
  8 in total

1.  Electronic health records-driven phenotyping: challenges, recent advances, and perspectives.

Authors:  Jyotishman Pathak; Abel N Kho; Joshua C Denny
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Development and validation of an electronic phenotyping algorithm for chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Girish N Nadkarni; Omri Gottesman; James G Linneman; Herbert Chase; Richard L Berg; Samira Farouk; Rajiv Nadukuru; Vaneet Lotay; Steve Ellis; George Hripcsak; Peggy Peissig; Chunhua Weng; Erwin P Bottinger
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2014-11-14

3.  Comparison of two methods for collecting antibiotic use data on small dairy farms.

Authors:  L E Redding; F Cubas-Delgado; M D Sammel; G Smith; D T Galligan; M Z Levy; S Hennessy
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 2.670

4.  Text Mining of the Electronic Health Record: An Information Extraction Approach for Automated Identification and Subphenotyping of HFpEF Patients for Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Siddhartha R Jonnalagadda; Abhishek K Adupa; Ravi P Garg; Jessica Corona-Cox; Sanjiv J Shah
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  Clinical research informatics: a conceptual perspective.

Authors:  Michael G Kahn; Chunhua Weng
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 6.  A review of approaches to identifying patient phenotype cohorts using electronic health records.

Authors:  Chaitanya Shivade; Preethi Raghavan; Eric Fosler-Lussier; Peter J Embi; Noemie Elhadad; Stephen B Johnson; Albert M Lai
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  Validation and Improvement of a Convolutional Neural Network to Predict the Involved Pathology in a Head and Neck Surgery Cohort.

Authors:  Dorian Culié; Renaud Schiappa; Sara Contu; Boris Scheller; Agathe Villarme; Olivier Dassonville; Gilles Poissonnet; Alexandre Bozec; Emmanuel Chamorey
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 4.614

8.  Development of A Machine Learning Algorithm to Classify Drugs Of Unknown Fetal Effect.

Authors:  Mary Regina Boland; Fernanda Polubriaginof; Nicholas P Tatonetti
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.