Literature DB >> 22070330

Multi-rigid image segmentation and registration for the analysis of joint motion from three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging.

Yangqiu Hu1, William R Ledoux, Michael Fassbind, Eric S Rohr, Bruce J Sangeorzan, David Haynor.   

Abstract

We report an image segmentation and registration method for studying joint morphology and kinematics from in vivo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans and its application to the analysis of foot and ankle joint motion. Using an MRI-compatible positioning device, a foot was scanned in a single neutral and seven other positions ranging from maximum plantar flexion, inversion, and internal rotation to maximum dorsiflexion, eversion, and external rotation. A segmentation method combining graph cuts and level set was developed. In the subsequent registration step, a separate rigid body transformation for each bone was obtained by registering the neutral position dataset to each of the other ones, which produced an accurate description of the motion between them. The segmentation algorithm allowed a user to interactively delineate 14 foot bones in the neutral position volume in less than 30 min total (user and computer processing unit [CPU]) time. Registration to the seven other positions took approximately 10 additional minutes of user time and 5.25 h of CPU time. For validation, our results were compared with those obtained from 3DViewnix, a semiautomatic segmentation program. We achieved excellent agreement, with volume overlap ratios greater than 88% for all bones excluding the intermediate cuneiform and the lesser metatarsals. For the registration of the neutral scan to the seven other positions, the average overlap ratio is 94.25%, while the minimum overlap ratio is 89.49% for the tibia between the neutral position and position 1, which might be due to different fields of view (FOV). To process a single foot in eight positions, our tool requires only minimal user interaction time (less than 30 min total), a level of improvement that has the potential to make joint motion analysis from MRI practical in research and clinical applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22070330      PMCID: PMC5413119          DOI: 10.1115/1.4005175

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  23 in total

1.  Voxel similarity measures for 3-D serial MR brain image registration.

Authors:  M Holden; D L Hill; E R Denton; J M Jarosz; T C Cox; T Rohlfing; J Goodey; D J Hawkes
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Use of dual Euler angles to quantify the three-dimensional joint motion and its application to the ankle joint complex.

Authors:  Ning Ying; Wangdo Kim
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  A MR imaging procedure to measure tarsal bone rotations.

Authors:  P Wolf; R Luechinger; P Boesiger; E Stuessi; A Stacoff
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.097

4.  In-vivo range of motion of the subtalar joint using computed tomography.

Authors:  Lijkele Beimers; Gabriëlle Josephine Maria Tuijthof; Leendert Blankevoort; Remmet Jonges; Mario Maas; C Niek van Dijk
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Analysis of in vivo 3-D internal kinematics of the joints of the foot.

Authors:  J K Udupa; B E Hirsch; H J Hillstrom; G R Bauer; J B Kneeland
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Effect of skin movement on the analysis of skeletal knee joint motion during running.

Authors:  C Reinschmidt; A J van den Bogert; B M Nigg; A Lundberg; N Murphy
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Measurement of the total motion between two body segments. I. Analytical development.

Authors:  G L Kinzel; A S Hall; B M Hillberry
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1972-01       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Kinematic changes of the foot and ankle in patients with systemic rheumatoid arthritis and forefoot deformity.

Authors:  Michael Khazzam; Jason T Long; Richard M Marks; Gerald F Harris
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.494

9.  A kinematical analysis of the tarsal joints. An X-ray photogrammetric study.

Authors:  E J van Langelaan
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand Suppl       Date:  1983

10.  Six DOF in vivo kinematics of the ankle joint complex: Application of a combined dual-orthogonal fluoroscopic and magnetic resonance imaging technique.

Authors:  Richard J de Asla; Lu Wan; Harry E Rubash; Guoan Li
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.494

View more
  1 in total

1.  Evaluating foot kinematics using magnetic resonance imaging: from maximum plantar flexion, inversion, and internal rotation to maximum dorsiflexion, eversion, and external rotation.

Authors:  Michael J Fassbind; Eric S Rohr; Yangqiu Hu; David R Haynor; Sorin Siegler; Bruce J Sangeorzan; William R Ledoux
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.097

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.