| Literature DB >> 22069687 |
Raymond Devlin1, Katrina Campbell, Kentaro Kawatsu, Christopher Elliott.
Abstract
Paralytic shellfish poisoning (PSP) is a potentially fatal human health condition caused by the consumption of shellfish containing high levels of PSP toxins. Toxin extraction from shellfish and from algal cultures for use as standards and analysis by alternative analytical monitoring methods to the mouse bioassay is extensive and laborious. This study investigated whether a selected MAb antibody could be coupled to a novel form of magnetic microsphere (hollow glass magnetic microspheres, brand name Ferrospheres-N) and whether these coated microspheres could be utilized in the extraction of low concentrations of the PSP toxin, STX, from potential extraction buffers and spiked mussel extracts. The feasibility of utilizing a mass of 25 mg of Ferrospheres-N, as a simple extraction procedure for STX from spiked sodium acetate buffer, spiked PBS buffer and spiked mussel extracts was determined. The effects of a range of toxin concentrations (20-300 ng/mL), incubation times and temperature on the capability of the immuno-capture of the STX from the spiked mussel extracts were investigated. Finally, the coated microspheres were tested to determine their efficiency at extracting PSP toxins from naturally contaminated mussel samples. Toxin recovery after each experiment was determined by HPLC analysis. This study on using a highly novel immunoaffinity based extraction procedure, using STX as a model, has indicated that it could be a convenient alternative to conventional extraction procedures used in toxin purification prior to sample analysis.Entities:
Keywords: Ferrospheres; immunoaffinity; magnetic microspheres; paralytic shellfish poisoning (PSP); saxitoxin
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22069687 PMCID: PMC3210453 DOI: 10.3390/toxins3010001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Toxins (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6651 Impact factor: 4.546
Figure 1Structures of the PSP toxins.
Classification of major PSP toxins based on chemical structures.
| Carbamate Toxins | Decarbamoyl toxins | Deoxydecarbamoyl toxins | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | R2 | R3 | R4: OCONH2 | R4: OCONHSO3- | R4: OH | R4: H |
| H | H | H | STX | B1 (GTX 5) | dc-STX | do-STX |
| H | H | OSO3- | GTX 2 | C1 | dc-GTX 2 | do-GTX 2 |
| H | OSO3- | H | GTX 3 | C2 | dc-GTX 3 | do-GTX 3 |
| OH | H | H | NEO | B2 (GTX 6) | dc-NEO | |
| OH | H | OSO3- | GTX 1 | C3 | dc-GTX 1 | |
| OH | OSO3- | H | GTX 4 | C4 | dc-GTX 4 |
Figure 2Influence of elution volume on recovery of STX from GT-13A Ferrospheres-N.
Recovery of STX using Ferrospheres-N coupled to GT-13A after multiple uses.
| Bead Usage | Mean (±SD) STX Eluted (ng) | % Recovery normalized against recovery obtained after 1st usage |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 64.5 (±3.2) | 100 |
| 10 | 64.0 (±7.6) | 99.2 |
| 20 | 63.8 (±4.2) | 98.9 |
| 30 | 62.9 (±5.3) | 97.5 |
| 35 | 59.3 (± 11.1) | 91.9 |
Figure 3STX recovery from spiked buffers and spiked mussel extracts after to GT-13A coupled Ferrospheres-N.
Figure 4Effect of time on STX recovery from spiked mussel extracts.
Figure 5Effect of temperature on STX recovery from spiked mussel extracts.
PSP toxin recovery as determined by the AOAC HPLC method, after addition and elution from Ferrospheres-N and percentage recovery of the microsphere method when compared to the HPLC extraction method.
| Sample | Ronas Voe | Cribba Sound | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Toxin | AOAC HPLC method (ng/mL) | Recovered after Ferrospheres-N (ng/mL) | % Recovery | AOAC HPLC method (ng/mL) | Recovered after Ferrospheres-N (ng/mL) | % Recovery |
| STX | 83 | 69.6 ± 4.1 | 83.9 ± 4.9 | 179 | 67.6 ± 3.3 | 39.3 ± 1.9 |
| NEO | ND | ND | ND | 112 | ND | ND |
| GTX 1/4 | 437 | 4.2 ± 2.5 | 1.0 ± 0.6 | 417 | 3.8 ± 0.4 | 0.9 ± 0.1 |
| GTX 2/3 | 302 | 188.1 ± 6.7 | 62.3 ± 2.2 | 268 | 122.8 ± 34.9 | 45.8 ± 13.0 |
| GTX 5 | ND | 1.6 ± 0.6 | ND | 3.3 ± 0.1 | ||
| C1/C2 | ND | 22.2 ± 5.6 | ND | 20.2 ± 1.4 | ||
Figure 6HPLC chromatograms showing the recovery of STX with GT-13A coupled Ferrospheres-N (a) effluent step, showing unbound toxin. (b) Wash step. (c) Elution step. (d) Comparison HPLC chromatogram of a mussel sample cleaned-up via the ‘Lawrence method’ [7].