Literature DB >> 3409896

A comparison of isometric exercise, cold pressor stimulation and dynamic exercise in patients with coronary heart disease.

I N Findlay1, G Gillen, A D Cunningham, A T Elliott, T Aitchison, H J Dargie.   

Abstract

Isometric exercise and cold pressor stimulation have been proposed as alternatives to dynamic exercise in the evaluation of patients with coronary heart disease. We evaluated all three, by gated radionuclide ventriculography, in 13 male controls and 44 male patients with coronary heart disease. In controls, mean left ventricular ejection fraction did not change during isometric exercise or cold pressor stimulation (64 +/- 2 to 63 +/- 2 and 63 +/- 3) but fell significantly in patients (56 +/- 1 to 53 +/- 1 and 53 +/- 1, both P less than 0.001). During dynamic exercise, mean left ventricular ejection fraction rose in controls (64 +/- 2 to 84 +/- 2, P less than 0.001) but did not change in patients (56 +/- 1 to 56 +/- 2). There was considerable overlap between the groups in the left ventricular ejection fraction response to isometric exercise and cold pressor stimulation; only dynamic exercise discriminated between them. Isometric exercise and cold pressor stimulation are of little value in the diagnosis of coronary heart disease by radionuclide ventriculography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3409896     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a062557

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  5 in total

1.  Cold pressor stimulation diminishes P50 amplitude in normal subjects.

Authors:  Adam J Woods; John W Philbeck; Kenneth Chelette; Robert D Skinner; Edgar Garcia-Rill; Mark Mennemeier
Journal:  Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars)       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.579

2.  A survey of nuclear cardiological practice in Great Britain. The British Nuclear Cardiology Group.

Authors:  R Underwood; C Gibson; A Tweddel; J Flint
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1992-03

3.  Improvement in arousal, visual neglect, and perception of stimulus intensity following cold pressor stimulation.

Authors:  Adam J Woods; Mark Mennemeier; Edgar Garcia-Rill; Tiffany Huitt; Kenneth C Chelette; Gary McCullough; Tiffany Munn; Ginger Brown; Thomas S Kiser
Journal:  Neurocase       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 0.881

4.  Reproducibility of the cold pressor test: studies in normal subjects.

Authors:  M L Fasano; T Sand; A O Brubakk; P Kruszewski; C Bordini; O Sjaastad
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.435

5.  Hyper-arousal decreases human visual thresholds.

Authors:  Adam J Woods; John W Philbeck; Philip Wirtz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.