Literature DB >> 22066743

Prevalence and prognostic significance of secondary lymphedema following breast cancer.

Sandi Hayes1, Tracey Di Sipio, Sheree Rye, J Alejandro López, Christobel Saunders, Chris Pyke, John Bashford, Diana Battistutta, Beth Newman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The adverse consequences of lymphedema following breast cancer in relation to physical function and quality of life are clear; however, its potential relationship with survival has not been investigated. Our purpose was to determine the prevalence of lymphedema and associated upper-body symptoms at 6 years following breast cancer and to examine the prognostic significance of lymphedema with respect to overall 6-year survival (OS). METHODS AND
RESULTS: A population-based sample of Australian women (n = 287) diagnosed with invasive, unilateral breast cancer was followed for a median of 6.6 years and prospectively assessed for lymphedema (using bioimpedance spectroscopy [BIS], sum of arm circumferences [SOAC], and self-reported arm swelling), a range of upper-body symptoms, and vital status. OS was measured from date of diagnosis to date of death or last follow-up. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to calculate OS and Cox proportional hazards models quantified the risk associated with lymphedema. Approximately 45% of women had reported at least one moderate to extreme symptom at 6.6 years postdiagnosis, while 34% had shown clinical evidence of lymphedema, and 48% reported arm swelling at least once since baseline assessment. A total of 27 (9.4%) women died during the follow-up period, and lymphedema, diagnosed by BIS or SOAC between 6-18 months postdiagnosis, predicted mortality (BIS: HR = 2.5; 95% CI: 0.9, 6.8, p = 0.08; SOAC: 3.0; 95% CI: 1.1, 8.7, p = 0.04). There was no association (HR = 1.2; 95% CI: 0.5, 2.6, p = 0.68) between self-reported arm swelling and OS.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that lymphedema may influence survival following breast cancer treatment and warrant further investigation in other cancer cohorts and explication of a potential underlying biology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22066743     DOI: 10.1089/lrb.2011.0007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lymphat Res Biol        ISSN: 1539-6851            Impact factor:   2.589


  14 in total

1.  Possible genetic predisposition to lymphedema after breast cancer.

Authors:  Beth Newman; Felicity Lose; Mary-Anne Kedda; Mathias Francois; Kaltin Ferguson; Monika Janda; Patsy Yates; Amanda B Spurdle; Sandra C Hayes
Journal:  Lymphat Res Biol       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 2.589

2.  Screening for breast cancer-related lymphedema: the need for standardization.

Authors:  Jean O'Toole; Lauren S Jammallo; Cynthia L Miller; Melissa N Skolny; Michelle C Specht; Alphonse G Taghian
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013-04-10

3.  Cytokine candidate genes predict the development of secondary lymphedema following breast cancer surgery.

Authors:  Geraldine Leung; Christina Baggott; Claudia West; Charles Elboim; Steven M Paul; Bruce A Cooper; Gary Abrams; Anand Dhruva; Brian L Schmidt; Kord Kober; John D Merriman; Heather Leutwyler; John Neuhaus; Dale Langford; Betty J Smoot; Bradley E Aouizerat; Christine Miaskowski
Journal:  Lymphat Res Biol       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 2.589

Review 4.  The impact of radiation on lymphedema: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Omar Allam; Kitae E Park; Ludmila Chandler; Mohammad Ali Mozaffari; Maham Ahmad; Xiaona Lu; Michael Alperovich
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2020-04

5.  Sleep disturbance in cancer survivors with lymphedema: a scoping review.

Authors:  Karen Bock; Rebecca Ludwig; Prasanna Vaduvathiriyan; Leslie LeSuer; Catherine Siengsukon
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 3.359

6.  A new soft tissue volume measurement strategy using ultrasonography.

Authors:  Ji Hye Hwang; Chang-Hyung Lee; Hae Hyun Lee; Soo Yeon Kim
Journal:  Lymphat Res Biol       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 2.589

7.  Risk factors of breast cancer-related lymphedema.

Authors:  Saadet Ugur; Cumhur Arıcı; Muhittin Yaprak; Ayhan Mescı; Gulbin Ayse Arıcı; Kemal Dolay; Vahit Ozmen
Journal:  Lymphat Res Biol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.589

Review 8.  Lymphedema following treatment for breast cancer: a new approach to an old problem.

Authors:  Jean O'Toole; Lauren S Jammallo; Melissa N Skolny; Cynthia L Miller; Krista Elliott; Michelle C Specht; Alphonse G Taghian
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2013-06-16       Impact factor: 6.312

9.  Diagnostic Methods, Risk Factors, Prevention, and Management of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: Past, Present, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Hoda E Sayegh; Maria S Asdourian; Meyha N Swaroop; Cheryl L Brunelle; Melissa N Skolny; Laura Salama; Alphonse G Taghian
Journal:  Curr Breast Cancer Rep       Date:  2017-05-03

10.  Best Practice Guidelines in Assessment, Risk Reduction, Management, and Surveillance for Post-Breast Cancer Lymphedema.

Authors:  Jane M Armer; Jennifer M Hulett; Michael Bernas; Pam Ostby; Bob R Stewart; Janice N Cormier
Journal:  Curr Breast Cancer Rep       Date:  2013-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.