Literature DB >> 22059437

Comprehensive comparison of iTRAQ and label-free LC-based quantitative proteomics approaches using two Chlamydomonas reinhardtii strains of interest for biofuels engineering.

Hongxia Wang1, Sophie Alvarez, Leslie M Hicks.   

Abstract

Comprehensive comparisons of quantitative proteomics techniques are rare in the literature, yet they are crucially important for optimal selection of approaches and methodologies that are ideal for a given proteomics initiative. In this study, two LC-based quantitative proteomics approaches--iTRAQ and label-free--were implemented using the LTQ-Orbitrap Velos platform. For this comparison, the model used was the total protein content from two Chlamydomonas reinhardtii strains in the context of alternative biofuels production. The strain comparison includes sta6 (a starch-less mutant of cw15) that produces twice as many lipid bodies (LB) containing triacylglycerols (TAGs) as its parental strain cw15 (a cell wall-deficient C. reinhardtii strain) under nitrogen starvation. Internal standard addition was used to rigorously assess the quantitation accuracy and precision of each method. Results from iTRAQ-4plex labeling using HCD (higher energy collision-induced dissociation) fragmentation were compared to those obtained using a label-free approach based on the peak area of intact peptides and collision-induced dissociation. The accuracy and precision, number of identified/quantified proteins and statistically significant protein differences detected, as well as efficiency of these two quantitative proteomics methods were evaluated and compared. Four technical and three biological replicates of each strain were performed to assess both the technical and biological variation of both approaches. A total of 896 and 639 proteins were identified with high confidence, and 329 and 124 proteins were quantified significantly with label-free and iTRAQ, respectively, using biological replicates. The results showed that both iTRAQ labeling and label-free methods provide high quality quantitative and qualitative data using nano-LC coupled with the LTQ-Orbitrap Velos mass spectrometer, but the selection of the optimal approach is dependent on experimental design and the biological question to be addressed. The functional categorization of the differential proteins between cw15 and sta6 reveals already known but also new mechanisms likely responsible for the production of lipids in sta6 and sets the baseline for future studies aimed at engineering these strains for high oil production.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22059437     DOI: 10.1021/pr2008225

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Proteome Res        ISSN: 1535-3893            Impact factor:   4.466


  49 in total

1.  Proteome-Wide Analysis of Cysteine Reactivity during Effector-Triggered Immunity.

Authors:  Evan W McConnell; Philip Berg; Timothy J Westlake; Katherine M Wilson; George V Popescu; Leslie M Hicks; Sorina C Popescu
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 2.  Proteomic approaches in research of cyanobacterial photosynthesis.

Authors:  Natalia Battchikova; Martina Angeleri; Eva-Mari Aro
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  iTRAQ-based quantitative proteomic analysis on differentially expressed proteins of rat mandibular condylar cartilage induced by reducing dietary loading.

Authors:  Liting Jiang; Yinyin Xie; Li Wei; Qi Zhou; Ning Li; Xinquan Jiang; Yiming Gao
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 4.592

4.  An adaptive alignment algorithm for quality-controlled label-free LC-MS.

Authors:  Marianne Sandin; Ashfaq Ali; Karin Hansson; Olle Månsson; Erik Andreasson; Svante Resjö; Fredrik Levander
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 5.911

5.  Defining, comparing, and improving iTRAQ quantification in mass spectrometry proteomics data.

Authors:  Lina Hultin-Rosenberg; Jenny Forshed; Rui M M Branca; Janne Lehtiö; Henrik J Johansson
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 5.911

6.  Studies on quantitative phosphopeptide analysis by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry without label, chromatography or calibration curves.

Authors:  Hsin-Pin Ho; Pratikkumar Rathod; Marissa Louis; Christine K Tada; Sherida Rahaman; Kevin J Mark; Jin Leng; Dibyendu Dana; Sanjai Kumar; Mathias Lichterfeld; Emmanuel J Chang
Journal:  Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 2.419

7.  Systems-level analysis of nitrogen starvation-induced modifications of carbon metabolism in a Chlamydomonas reinhardtii starchless mutant.

Authors:  Ian K Blaby; Anne G Glaesener; Tabea Mettler; Sorel T Fitz-Gibbon; Sean D Gallaher; Bensheng Liu; Nanette R Boyle; Janette Kropat; Mark Stitt; Shannon Johnson; Christoph Benning; Matteo Pellegrini; David Casero; Sabeeha S Merchant
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 11.277

8.  The regulation of photosynthetic structure and function during nitrogen deprivation in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii.

Authors:  Matthew T Juergens; Rahul R Deshpande; Ben F Lucker; Jeong-Jin Park; Hongxia Wang; Mahmoud Gargouri; F Omar Holguin; Bradley Disbrow; Tanner Schaub; Jeremy N Skepper; David M Kramer; David R Gang; Leslie M Hicks; Yair Shachar-Hill
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 8.340

9.  Colonization state influences the hemocyte proteome in a beneficial squid-Vibrio symbiosis.

Authors:  Tyler R Schleicher; Nathan C VerBerkmoes; Manesh Shah; Spencer V Nyholm
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 5.911

10.  Dissecting characteristics and dynamics of differentially expressed proteins during multistage carcinogenesis of human colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Fang Peng; Ying Huang; Mao-Yu Li; Guo-Qing Li; Hui-Chao Huang; Rui Guan; Zhu-Chu Chen; Song-Ping Liang; Yong-Heng Chen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-05-14       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.