PURPOSE: Panobinostat is a novel oral pan-deacetylase inhibitor with promising anti-cancer activity. The study aimed to determine the influence of food on the oral bioavailability of panobinostat. METHODS: This multicenter study consisted of a randomized, three-way crossover, food-effect study period (cycle 1) followed by single-agent panobinostat continual treatment phase in patients with advanced cancer. Patients received panobinostat 20 mg twice weekly, and panobinostat pharmacokinetics was investigated on days 1, 8, and 15 with a randomly assigned sequence of three prandial states (fasting, high-fat, and normal breakfast). RESULTS:Thirty-six patients were assessed for the food effect on pharmacokinetics and safety in cycle 1, after which 29 patients continued treatment, receiving single-agent panobinostat. Safety and antitumor activity were assessed during the extension period. Panobinostat systemic exposure was marginally reduced (14-16%) following food [geometric mean ratio (GMR) of the AUC(0-∞)/high-fat breakfast/fasting, 0.84 (90% confidence interval {CI}, 0.74-0.96); normal breakfast/fasting, 0.86 (90% CI, 0.75-1.00)], and interpatient variability (coefficient of variation, 59%) remained essentially unchanged with or without food. Panobinostat C (max) was reduced by 44% (high-fat) and 36% (normal) with median T (max) prolonged by 1-1.5 h following food. Panobinostat was well tolerated, with thrombocytopenia, fatigue, nausea, and vomiting as common adverse events, and demonstrated antitumor activity with one patient with a partial response and six patients with stable disease as best response. CONCLUSIONS: Food produced minor changes in oral panobinostat exposure; thus, panobinostat can be given without regard to food intake in future clinical studies.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE:Panobinostat is a novel oral pan-deacetylase inhibitor with promising anti-cancer activity. The study aimed to determine the influence of food on the oral bioavailability of panobinostat. METHODS: This multicenter study consisted of a randomized, three-way crossover, food-effect study period (cycle 1) followed by single-agent panobinostat continual treatment phase in patients with advanced cancer. Patients received panobinostat 20 mg twice weekly, and panobinostat pharmacokinetics was investigated on days 1, 8, and 15 with a randomly assigned sequence of three prandial states (fasting, high-fat, and normal breakfast). RESULTS: Thirty-six patients were assessed for the food effect on pharmacokinetics and safety in cycle 1, after which 29 patients continued treatment, receiving single-agent panobinostat. Safety and antitumor activity were assessed during the extension period. Panobinostat systemic exposure was marginally reduced (14-16%) following food [geometric mean ratio (GMR) of the AUC(0-∞)/high-fat breakfast/fasting, 0.84 (90% confidence interval {CI}, 0.74-0.96); normal breakfast/fasting, 0.86 (90% CI, 0.75-1.00)], and interpatient variability (coefficient of variation, 59%) remained essentially unchanged with or without food. Panobinostat C (max) was reduced by 44% (high-fat) and 36% (normal) with median T (max) prolonged by 1-1.5 h following food. Panobinostat was well tolerated, with thrombocytopenia, fatigue, nausea, and vomiting as common adverse events, and demonstrated antitumor activity with one patient with a partial response and six patients with stable disease as best response. CONCLUSIONS: Food produced minor changes in oral panobinostat exposure; thus, panobinostat can be given without regard to food intake in future clinical studies.
Authors: P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-02-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Eric H Rubin; Nancy G B Agrawal; Evan J Friedman; Pamela Scott; Kathryn E Mazina; Linda Sun; Lihong Du; Justin L Ricker; Stanley R Frankel; Keith M Gottesdiener; John A Wagner; Marian Iwamoto Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2006-12-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Derek S Welsbie; Jin Xu; Yu Chen; Laetitia Borsu; Howard I Scher; Neal Rosen; Charles L Sawyers Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2009-01-27 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: P Maiso; E Colado; E M Ocio; M Garayoa; J Martín; P Atadja; A Pandiella; J F San-Miguel Journal: Leukemia Date: 2009-10-08 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: Ahmad A Tarhini; Haris Zahoor; Brian McLaughlin; William E Gooding; John C Schmitz; Jill M Siegfried; Mark A Socinski; Athanassios Argiris Journal: Anticancer Res Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 2.480
Authors: Peter M Wilson; Melissa J Labonte; Shelby C Martin; Stephanie T Kuwahara; Anthony El-Khoueiry; Heinz-Josef Lenz; Robert D Ladner Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2013-01-09 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Ivan Kopljar; David J Gallacher; An De Bondt; Laure Cougnaud; Eddy Vlaminckx; Ilse Van den Wyngaert; Hua Rong Lu Journal: Stem Cells Transl Med Date: 2016-03-31 Impact factor: 6.940
Authors: Maulik R Patel; Kevinkumar A Kansagra; Devang P Parikh; Deven V Parmar; Hardik B Patel; Mayur M Soni; Uday S Patil; Harilal V Patel; Jaimik A Patel; Swagat S Gujarathi; Krupi V Parmar; Nuggehally R Srinivas Journal: Clin Drug Investig Date: 2018-01 Impact factor: 2.859