Literature DB >> 22057852

The effect of food on the bioavailability of panobinostat, an orally active pan-histone deacetylase inhibitor, in patients with advanced cancer.

Geoffrey I Shapiro1, Richard Frank, Uday B Dandamudi, Thomas Hengelage, Lily Zhao, Lucien Gazi, Maria Grazia Porro, Margaret M Woo, Lionel D Lewis.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Panobinostat is a novel oral pan-deacetylase inhibitor with promising anti-cancer activity. The study aimed to determine the influence of food on the oral bioavailability of panobinostat.
METHODS: This multicenter study consisted of a randomized, three-way crossover, food-effect study period (cycle 1) followed by single-agent panobinostat continual treatment phase in patients with advanced cancer. Patients received panobinostat 20 mg twice weekly, and panobinostat pharmacokinetics was investigated on days 1, 8, and 15 with a randomly assigned sequence of three prandial states (fasting, high-fat, and normal breakfast).
RESULTS: Thirty-six patients were assessed for the food effect on pharmacokinetics and safety in cycle 1, after which 29 patients continued treatment, receiving single-agent panobinostat. Safety and antitumor activity were assessed during the extension period. Panobinostat systemic exposure was marginally reduced (14-16%) following food [geometric mean ratio (GMR) of the AUC(0-∞)/high-fat breakfast/fasting, 0.84 (90% confidence interval {CI}, 0.74-0.96); normal breakfast/fasting, 0.86 (90% CI, 0.75-1.00)], and interpatient variability (coefficient of variation, 59%) remained essentially unchanged with or without food. Panobinostat C (max) was reduced by 44% (high-fat) and 36% (normal) with median T (max) prolonged by 1-1.5 h following food. Panobinostat was well tolerated, with thrombocytopenia, fatigue, nausea, and vomiting as common adverse events, and demonstrated antitumor activity with one patient with a partial response and six patients with stable disease as best response.
CONCLUSIONS: Food produced minor changes in oral panobinostat exposure; thus, panobinostat can be given without regard to food intake in future clinical studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22057852      PMCID: PMC4491112          DOI: 10.1007/s00280-011-1758-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol        ISSN: 0344-5704            Impact factor:   3.333


  14 in total

1.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada.

Authors:  P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Predicting pharmacokinetic food effects using biorelevant solubility media and physiologically based modelling.

Authors:  Hannah M Jones; Neil Parrott; Gerd Ohlenbusch; Thierry Lavé
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Aggresome induction by proteasome inhibitor bortezomib and alpha-tubulin hyperacetylation by tubulin deacetylase (TDAC) inhibitor LBH589 are synergistic in myeloma cells.

Authors:  Laurence Catley; Ellen Weisberg; Tanyel Kiziltepe; Yu-Tzu Tai; Teru Hideshima; Paola Neri; Pierfrancesco Tassone; Peter Atadja; Dharminder Chauhan; Nikhil C Munshi; Kenneth C Anderson
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2006-05-25       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  A study to determine the effects of food and multiple dosing on the pharmacokinetics of vorinostat given orally to patients with advanced cancer.

Authors:  Eric H Rubin; Nancy G B Agrawal; Evan J Friedman; Pamela Scott; Kathryn E Mazina; Linda Sun; Lihong Du; Justin L Ricker; Stanley R Frankel; Keith M Gottesdiener; John A Wagner; Marian Iwamoto
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2006-12-01       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Histone deacetylases are required for androgen receptor function in hormone-sensitive and castrate-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Derek S Welsbie; Jin Xu; Yu Chen; Laetitia Borsu; Howard I Scher; Neal Rosen; Charles L Sawyers
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  A theoretical basis for a biopharmaceutic drug classification: the correlation of in vitro drug product dissolution and in vivo bioavailability.

Authors:  G L Amidon; H Lennernäs; V P Shah; J R Crison
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.200

7.  In vitro and in vivo rationale for the triple combination of panobinostat (LBH589) and dexamethasone with either bortezomib or lenalidomide in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Enrique M Ocio; David Vilanova; Peter Atadja; Patricia Maiso; Edvan Crusoe; Diego Fernández-Lázaro; Mercedes Garayoa; Laura San-Segundo; Teresa Hernández-Iglesias; Enrique de Alava; Wenlin Shao; Yung-Mae Yao; Atanasio Pandiella; Jesús F San-Miguel
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 8.  Panobinostat (LBH589): a potent pan-deacetylase inhibitor with promising activity against hematologic and solid tumors.

Authors:  H Miles Prince; Mark J Bishton; Ricky W Johnstone
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.404

Review 9.  Development of the pan-DAC inhibitor panobinostat (LBH589): successes and challenges.

Authors:  Peter Atadja
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2009-04-02       Impact factor: 8.679

10.  The synergy of panobinostat plus doxorubicin in acute myeloid leukemia suggests a role for HDAC inhibitors in the control of DNA repair.

Authors:  P Maiso; E Colado; E M Ocio; M Garayoa; J Martín; P Atadja; A Pandiella; J F San-Miguel
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 11.528

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Role of Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors in Relapsed Refractory Multiple Myeloma: A Focus on Vorinostat and Panobinostat.

Authors:  Salma Afifi; Angela Michael; Mahshid Azimi; Mabel Rodriguez; Nikoletta Lendvai; Ola Landgren
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.705

Review 2.  Panobinostat: first global approval.

Authors:  Karly P Garnock-Jones
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Phase I trial of carboplatin and etoposide in combination with panobinostat in patients with lung cancer.

Authors:  Ahmad A Tarhini; Haris Zahoor; Brian McLaughlin; William E Gooding; John C Schmitz; Jill M Siegfried; Mark A Socinski; Athanassios Argiris
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.480

Review 4.  Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Panobinostat.

Authors:  Mathilde Van Veggel; Elsbeth Westerman; Paul Hamberg
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Sustained inhibition of deacetylases is required for the antitumor activity of the histone deactylase inhibitors panobinostat and vorinostat in models of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Peter M Wilson; Melissa J Labonte; Shelby C Martin; Stephanie T Kuwahara; Anthony El-Khoueiry; Heinz-Josef Lenz; Robert D Ladner
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 3.850

6.  Conflicting meal recommendations for oral oncology drugs: pose risks to patient care?

Authors:  Guo Yu; Dan-Na Wu; Yan Gong; Guo-Fu Li; Hong-Hao Zhou
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  A proposal regarding reporting of in vitro testing results.

Authors:  Malcolm A Smith; Peter Houghton
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Functional and Transcriptional Characterization of Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor-Mediated Cardiac Adverse Effects in Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes.

Authors:  Ivan Kopljar; David J Gallacher; An De Bondt; Laure Cougnaud; Eddy Vlaminckx; Ilse Van den Wyngaert; Hua Rong Lu
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 6.940

9.  Effect of Food on the Pharmacokinetics of Saroglitazar Magnesium, a Novel Dual PPARαγ Agonist, in Healthy Adult Subjects.

Authors:  Maulik R Patel; Kevinkumar A Kansagra; Devang P Parikh; Deven V Parmar; Hardik B Patel; Mayur M Soni; Uday S Patil; Harilal V Patel; Jaimik A Patel; Swagat S Gujarathi; Krupi V Parmar; Nuggehally R Srinivas
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 10.  Epigenetic treatment of solid tumours: a review of clinical trials.

Authors:  Clara Nervi; Elisabetta De Marinis; Giovanni Codacci-Pisanelli
Journal:  Clin Epigenetics       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 6.551

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.