PURPOSE: This phase I study, conducted in advanced-stage cancer patients, assessed the safety and tolerability of oral vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid), single-dose and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of vorinostat, and the effect of a high-fat meal on vorinostat pharmacokinetics. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients (n = 23) received single doses of 400 mg vorinostat on day 1 (fasted) and day 5 (fed) with 48 hours of pharmacokinetic sampling on both days. Patients received 400 mg vorinostat once daily on days 7 to 28. On day 28, vorinostat was given (fed) with pharmacokinetic sampling for 24 hours after dose. RESULTS: The apparent t(1/2) of vorinostat was short (approximately 1.5 hours). A high-fat meal was associated with a small increase in the extent of absorption and a modest decrease in the rate of absorption. A short lag time was observed before detectable levels of vorinostat were observed in the fed state, and T(max) was delayed. Vorinostat concentrations were qualitatively similar following single-dose and multiple-dose administration; the accumulation ratio based on area under the curve was 1.21. The elimination of vorinostat occurred primarily through metabolism, with <1% of the given dose recovered intact in urine. The most common vorinostat-related adverse experiences were mild to moderate nausea, anorexia, fatigue, increased blood creatinine, and vomiting. CONCLUSIONS: Vorinostat concentrations were qualitatively similar after single and multiple doses. A high-fat meal increased the extent and modestly decreased the rate of absorption of vorinostat; this effect is not anticipated to be clinically meaningful. Continued investigation of 400 mg vorinostat given once daily in phase II and III efficacy studies is warranted.
PURPOSE: This phase I study, conducted in advanced-stage cancerpatients, assessed the safety and tolerability of oral vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid), single-dose and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of vorinostat, and the effect of a high-fat meal on vorinostat pharmacokinetics. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN:Patients (n = 23) received single doses of 400 mg vorinostat on day 1 (fasted) and day 5 (fed) with 48 hours of pharmacokinetic sampling on both days. Patients received 400 mg vorinostat once daily on days 7 to 28. On day 28, vorinostat was given (fed) with pharmacokinetic sampling for 24 hours after dose. RESULTS: The apparent t(1/2) of vorinostat was short (approximately 1.5 hours). A high-fat meal was associated with a small increase in the extent of absorption and a modest decrease in the rate of absorption. A short lag time was observed before detectable levels of vorinostat were observed in the fed state, and T(max) was delayed. Vorinostat concentrations were qualitatively similar following single-dose and multiple-dose administration; the accumulation ratio based on area under the curve was 1.21. The elimination of vorinostat occurred primarily through metabolism, with <1% of the given dose recovered intact in urine. The most common vorinostat-related adverse experiences were mild to moderate nausea, anorexia, fatigue, increased blood creatinine, and vomiting. CONCLUSIONS:Vorinostat concentrations were qualitatively similar after single and multiple doses. A high-fat meal increased the extent and modestly decreased the rate of absorption of vorinostat; this effect is not anticipated to be clinically meaningful. Continued investigation of 400 mg vorinostat given once daily in phase II and III efficacy studies is warranted.
Authors: Elham A Mohamed; Yunqi Zhao; Mahasen M Meshali; Connie M Remsberg; Thanaa M Borg; Abdel Monem M Foda; Jody K Takemoto; Casey L Sayre; Stephanie E Martinez; Neal M Davies; M Laird Forrest Journal: J Pharm Sci Date: 2012-07-17 Impact factor: 3.534
Authors: Nancy M Archin; Rosalie Bateson; Manoj K Tripathy; Amanda M Crooks; Kuo-Hsiung Yang; Noelle P Dahl; Mary F Kearney; Elizabeth M Anderson; John M Coffin; Matthew C Strain; Douglas D Richman; Kevin R Robertson; Angela D Kashuba; Ronald J Bosch; Daria J Hazuda; Joann D Kuruc; Joseph J Eron; David M Margolis Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2014-03-11 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Geoffrey I Shapiro; Richard Frank; Uday B Dandamudi; Thomas Hengelage; Lily Zhao; Lucien Gazi; Maria Grazia Porro; Margaret M Woo; Lionel D Lewis Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2011-11-06 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Narendra Bharathy; Noah E Berlow; Eric Wang; Jinu Abraham; Teagan P Settelmeyer; Jody E Hooper; Matthew N Svalina; Yoshihiro Ishikawa; Keith Zientek; Zia Bajwa; Martin W Goros; Brian S Hernandez; Johannes E Wolff; Michelle A Rudek; Linping Xu; Nicole M Anders; Ranadip Pal; Alexandria P Harrold; Angela M Davies; Arya Ashok; Darnell Bushby; Maria Mancini; Christopher Noakes; Neal C Goodwin; Peter Ordentlich; James Keck; Douglas S Hawkins; Erin R Rudzinski; Bishwanath Chatterjee; Hans Peter Bächinger; Frederic G Barr; Jennifer Liddle; Benjamin A Garcia; Atiya Mansoor; Theodore J Perkins; Christopher R Vakoc; Joel E Michalek; Charles Keller Journal: Sci Signal Date: 2018-11-20 Impact factor: 8.192
Authors: Thehang H Luu; Robert J Morgan; Lucille Leong; Dean Lim; Mark McNamara; Jana Portnow; Paul Frankel; David D Smith; James H Doroshow; Carol Wong; Ana Aparicio; David R Gandara; George Somlo Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2008-11-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: David Siegel; Mohamad Hussein; Chandra Belani; Francisco Robert; Evanthia Galanis; Victoria M Richon; José Garcia-Vargas; Cesar Sanz-Rodriguez; Syed Rizvi Journal: J Hematol Oncol Date: 2009-07-27 Impact factor: 17.388