UNLABELLED: A phase I trial consisting of panobinostat (a HDAC inhibitor), carboplatin and etoposide was conducted in patients with lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received carboplatin AUC5 on day 1 and etoposide 100 mg/m(2) on days 1, 2 and 3, every 21 days. Concurrent oral panobinostat was given 3 times weekly on a 2-weeks-on and 1-week-off schedule during the 4-6 cycles of chemotherapy and then continued as maintenance therapy. RESULTS: Six evaluable patients were treated at the first dose level of panobinostat (10 mg). Dose-limiting toxicity occurred in two patients (33%) during the first cycle. One patient developed grade 4 thrombocytopenia and another grade 4 febrile neutropenia. Therefore, the study was suspended based on the pre-specified study design. No recommended phase II starting dose was established. CONCLUSION: The addition of panobinostat to carboplatin and etoposide was not tolerable at the lowest dose level tested in this trial. Further research and development into this combination is not recommended.
UNLABELLED: A phase I trial consisting of panobinostat (a HDAC inhibitor), carboplatin and etoposide was conducted in patients with lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received carboplatin AUC5 on day 1 and etoposide 100 mg/m(2) on days 1, 2 and 3, every 21 days. Concurrent oral panobinostat was given 3 times weekly on a 2-weeks-on and 1-week-off schedule during the 4-6 cycles of chemotherapy and then continued as maintenance therapy. RESULTS: Six evaluable patients were treated at the first dose level of panobinostat (10 mg). Dose-limiting toxicity occurred in two patients (33%) during the first cycle. One patient developed grade 4 thrombocytopenia and another grade 4 febrile neutropenia. Therefore, the study was suspended based on the pre-specified study design. No recommended phase II starting dose was established. CONCLUSION: The addition of panobinostat to carboplatin and etoposide was not tolerable at the lowest dose level tested in this trial. Further research and development into this combination is not recommended.
Authors: Xiaodan Yu; Z Sheng Guo; Monica G Marcu; Len Neckers; Dao M Nguyen; G Aaron Chen; David S Schrump Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2002-04-03 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Tao Yan-Fang; Li Zhi-Heng; Xu Li-Xiao; Fang Fang; Lu Jun; Li Gang; Cao Lan; Wang Na-Na; Du Xiao-Juan; Sun Li-Chao; Zhao Wen-Li; Xiao Pei-Fang; Zhao He; Su Guang-Hao; Li Yan-Hong; Li Yi-Ping; Xu Yun-Yun; Zhou Hui-Ting; Wu Yi; Jin Mei-Fang; Liu Lin; Ni Jian; Hu Shao-Yan; Zhu Xue-Ming; Feng Xing; Wang Jian; Pan Jian Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-07-15 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Chengyin Min; Nathan Moore; Jeffrey R Shearstone; Steven N Quayle; Pengyu Huang; John H van Duzer; Matthew B Jarpe; Simon S Jones; Min Yang Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-01-06 Impact factor: 3.240