Literature DB >> 22057832

Occurrence and toxicity of antimicrobial triclosan and by-products in the environment.

Gilles Bedoux1, Benoit Roig, Olivier Thomas, Virginie Dupont, Barbara Le Bot.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: A review was undertaken on the occurrence, toxicity, and degradation of triclosan (TCS; 5-chloro-2,4-dichlorophenoxy)phenol) in the environment. TCS is a synthetic, broad-spectrum antibacterial agent incorporated in a wide variety of household and personal care products such as hand soap, toothpaste, and deodorants but also in textile fibers used in a range of other consumer products (e.g., toys, undergarments and cutting boards among other things). OCCURRENCE: Because of its partial elimination in sewage treatment plants, most reports describe TCS as one of the most commonly encountered substances in solid and water environmental compartments. It has been detected in a microgram per liter or microgram per kilogram level in sewage treatment plants (influents, effluents, and sludges), natural waters (rivers, lakes, and estuarine waters), and sediments as well as in drinking water. TOXICITY: Moreover, due to its high hydrophobicity, TCS can accumulate in fatty tissues and has been found in fish and human samples (urine, breast milk, and serum). TCS is known to be biodegradable, photo-unstable, and reactive towards chlorine and ozone. DISCUSSION: As a consequence, it can be transformed into potentially more toxic and persistent compounds, such as chlorinated phenols and biphenyl ethers after chlorination, methyl triclosan after biological methylation, and chlorinated dibenzodioxins after photooxidation. The toxicity of TCS toward aquatic organisms like fish, crustaceans, and algae has been demonstrated with EC50 values near TCS environmental concentrations. It has even been shown to produce cytotoxic, genotoxic, and endocrine disruptor effects.
CONCLUSION: Furthermore, the excessive use of TCS is suspected to increase the risk of emergence of TCS-resistant bacteria and the selection of resistant strains.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22057832     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-011-0632-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  185 in total

1.  Effects of three pharmaceutical and personal care products on natural freshwater algal assemblages.

Authors:  Brittan A Wilson; Val H Smith; Frank deNoyelles; Cynthia K Larive
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  What contributes to the sensitivity of microalgae to triclosan?

Authors:  Stephanie Franz; Rolf Altenburger; Hermann Heilmeier; Mechthild Schmitt-Jansen
Journal:  Aquat Toxicol       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 4.964

3.  Predicting accurate and ecologically relevant regional scale concentrations of triclosan in rivers for use in higher-tier aquatic risk assessments.

Authors:  Oliver R Price; Richard J Williams; Roger van Egmond; Mark J Wilkinson; Michael J Whelan
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 9.621

4.  Triclosan affects the microbial community in simulated sewage-drain-field soil and slows down xenobiotic degradation.

Authors:  Hanne Svenningsen; Trine Henriksen; Anders Priemé; Anders R Johnsen
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 8.071

5.  Physiological effects and bioconcentration of triclosan on amphibian larvae.

Authors:  Nicole M Palenske; Gopinath C Nallani; Edward M Dzialowski
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 3.228

6.  A fluorescence-based bioassay for aquatic macrophytes and its suitability for effect analysis of non-photosystem II inhibitors.

Authors:  Anette Küster; Korinna Pohl; Rolf Altenburger
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Oestrogenic and androgenic activity of triclosan in breast cancer cells.

Authors:  R H Gee; A Charles; N Taylor; P D Darbre
Journal:  J Appl Toxicol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.446

8.  Environmental Exposure of Aquatic and Terrestrial Biota to Triclosan and Triclocarban.

Authors:  Talia E Chalew; Rolf U Halden
Journal:  J Am Water Works Assoc       Date:  2009

9.  Pharmaceuticals and endocrine disrupting compounds in U.S. drinking water.

Authors:  Mark J Benotti; Rebecca A Trenholm; Brett J Vanderford; Janie C Holady; Benjamin D Stanford; Shane A Snyder
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2009-02-01       Impact factor: 9.028

10.  Acute toxicity of pharmaceutical and personal care products on freshwater crustacean (Thamnocephalus platyurus) and fish (Oryzias latipes).

Authors:  Joon-Woo Kim; Hiroshi Ishibashi; Ryoko Yamauchi; Nobuhiro Ichikawa; Yuji Takao; Masashi Hirano; Minoru Koga; Koji Arizono
Journal:  J Toxicol Sci       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.196

View more
  53 in total

1.  Personal care product use as a predictor of urinary concentrations of certain phthalates, parabens, and phenols in the HERMOSA study.

Authors:  Kimberly P Berger; Katherine R Kogut; Asa Bradman; Jianwen She; Qi Gavin; Rana Zahedi; Kimberly L Parra; Kim G Harley
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 5.563

2.  Ecotoxicological risk assessment and seasonal variation of some pharmaceuticals and personal care products in the sewage treatment plant and surface water bodies (lakes).

Authors:  G Archana; Rita Dhodapkar; Anupama Kumar
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Degradation of triclosan in the presence of p-aminobenzoic acid under simulated sunlight irradiation.

Authors:  Pingping Zhai; Xuan Chen; Wenbo Dong; Hongjing Li; Jean-Marc Chovelon
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Occurrence and removal of triclosan in Canadian wastewater systems.

Authors:  Paula Guerra; Steven Teslic; Ariba Shah; Amber Albert; Sarah B Gewurtz; Shirley Anne Smyth
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Urinary triclosan concentrations are inversely associated with body mass index and waist circumference in the US general population: Experience in NHANES 2003-2010.

Authors:  Shengxu Li; Jinying Zhao; Guangdi Wang; Yun Zhu; Felicia Rabito; Marie Krousel-Wood; Wei Chen; Paul K Whelton
Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health       Date:  2015-03-14       Impact factor: 5.840

6.  Cosmet'eau-Changes in the personal care product consumption practices: from whistle-blowers to impacts on aquatic environments.

Authors:  Adèle Bressy; Catherine Carré; Émilie Caupos; Bernard de Gouvello; José-Frédéric Deroubaix; Jean-Claude Deutsch; Romain Mailler; Anthony Marconi; Pascale Neveu; Laurent Paulic; Sébastien Pichon; Vincent Rocher; Irina Severin; Mathilde Soyer; Régis Moilleron
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-05-14       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  The pH-dependent toxicity of triclosan to five aquatic organisms (Daphnia magna, Photobacterium phosphoreum, Danio rerio, Limnodrilus hoffmeisteri, and Carassius auratus).

Authors:  Chenguang Li; Ruijuan Qu; Jing Chen; Shuo Zhang; Ahmed A Allam; Jamaan Ajarem; Zunyao Wang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 4.223

8.  High efficiency removal of triclosan by structure-directing agent modified mesoporous MIL-53(Al).

Authors:  Rongni Dou; Junya Zhang; Yuancai Chen; Siyuan Feng
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-02-18       Impact factor: 4.223

9.  Triclosan leads to dysregulation of the metabolic regulator FGF21 exacerbating high fat diet-induced nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Authors:  Mei-Fei Yueh; Feng He; Chen Chen; Catherine Vu; Anupriya Tripathi; Rob Knight; Michael Karin; Shujuan Chen; Robert H Tukey
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Triclosan: A Widespread Environmental Toxicant with Many Biological Effects.

Authors:  Mei-Fei Yueh; Robert H Tukey
Journal:  Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 13.820

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.