Literature DB >> 17993220

A fluorescence-based bioassay for aquatic macrophytes and its suitability for effect analysis of non-photosystem II inhibitors.

Anette Küster1, Korinna Pohl, Rolf Altenburger.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: BACKGROUND, GOALS AND SCOPE: During the last years the miniaturization of toxicity test systems for rapid and parallel measurements of large quantities of samples has often been discussed. For unicellular algae as well as for aquatic macrophytes, fluorescence-based miniaturized test systems have been introduced to analyze photosystem II (PSII) inhibitors. Nevertheless, high-throughput screening should also guarantee the effect detection of a broad range of toxicants in order to ensure routinely applicable, high-throughput measuring device experiments which can cover a broad range of toxicants and modes of action others than PSII inhibition. Thus, the aim of this study was to establish a fast and reproducible measuring system for non-PSII inhibitors for aquatic macrophyte species to overcome major limitations for use.
METHODS: A newly developed imaging pulse-amplitude-modulated chlorophyll fluorometer (I-PAM) was applied as an effect detector in short-term bioassays with the aquatic macrophyte species Lemna minor. This multiwell-plate based measuring device enabled the incubation and measurement of up to 24 samples in parallel. The chemicals paraquat-dichloride, alizarine and triclosan were chosen as representatives for the toxicant groups of non-PSII herbicides, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs), which are often detected in the aquatic environment. The I-PAM was used (i) to establish and validate the sensitivity of the test system to the three non-PSII inhibitors, (ii) to compare the test systems with standardized and established biotests for aquatic macrophytes, and (iii) to define necessary time scales in aquatic macrophyte testing. For validation of the fluorescence-based assay, the standard growth test with L. minor (ISO/DIS 20079) was performed in parallel for each chemical.
RESULTS: The results revealed that fluorescence-based measurements with the I-PAM allow rapid and parallel analysis of large amounts of aquatic macrophyte samples. The I-PAM enabled the recording of concentration-effect-curves with L. minor samples on a 24-well plate with single measurements. Fluorescence-based concentration-effect-curves could be detected for all three chemicals after only 1 h of incubation. After 4-5 h incubation time, the maximum inhibition of fluorescence showed an 80-100% effect for the chemicals tested. The EC50 after 24 h incubation were estimated to be 0.06 mg/L, 0.84 mg/L and 1.69 mg/L for paraquat-dichloride, alizarine and triclosan, respectively. DISCUSSION: The results obtained with the I-PAM after 24 h for the herbicide paraquat-dichloride and the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon alizarine were in good accordance with median effective concentrations (EC50s) obtained by the standardized growth test for L. minor after 7 d incubation (0.09 mg/L and 0.79 mg/L for paraquat-dichloride and alizarine, respectively). Those results were in accordance with literature findings for the two chemicals. In contrast, fluorescence-based EC50 of the antimicrobial agent triclosan proved to be two orders of magnitude greater when compared to the standard growth test with 7 d incubation time (0.026 mg/L) as well as with literature findings.
CONCLUSION: Typically, aquatic macrophyte testing is very time consuming and relies on laborious experimental set-ups. The I-PAM measuring device enabled fast effect screening for the three chemicals tested. While established test systems for aquatic macrophytes need incubation times of > or = 7 d, the I-PAM can detect inhibitory effects much earlier (24 h), even if inhibition of chemicals is not specifically associated with PSII. Thus, the fluorescence-based bioassay with the I-PAM offers a promising approach for the miniaturization and high-throughput testing of chemicals with aquatic macrophytes. For the chemical triclosan, however, the short-term effect prediction with the I-PAM has been shown to be less sensitive than with long-term bioassays, which might be due to physicochemical substance properties such as lipophilicity. RECOMMENDATIONS AND PERSPECTIVES: The results of this study show that the I-PAM represents a promising tool for decreasing the incubation times of aquatic macrophyte toxicity testing to about 24 h as a supplement to existing test batteries. The applicability of this I-PAM bioassay on emergent and submerged aquatic macrophyte species should be investigated in further studies. Regarding considerations that physicochemical properties of the tested substances might play an important role in microplate bioassays, the I-PAM bioassay should either be accompanied by evaluating physicochemical properties modeled from structural information prior to an experimental investigation, or by intensified chemical analyses to identify and determine nominal concentrations of the toxicants tested. The chemicals paraquat-dichloride, alizarine and triclosan were chosen as representatives for the toxicant groups of non-PSII herbicides, PAHs and PPCPs which are often detected in the aquatic environment. Nevertheless, in order to ensure a routinely applicable measuring device, experiments with a broader range of toxicants and samples of surface and/or waste waters are necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17993220     DOI: 10.1065/espr2007.04.410

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  22 in total

1.  Effects of three pharmaceutical and personal care products on natural freshwater algal assemblages.

Authors:  Brittan A Wilson; Val H Smith; Frank deNoyelles; Cynthia K Larive
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Passive sampling of herbicides combined with effect analysis in algae using a novel high-throughput phytotoxicity assay (Maxi-Imaging-PAM).

Authors:  Beate I Escher; Pam Quayle; Renee Muller; Ulrich Schreiber; Jochen F Mueller
Journal:  J Environ Monit       Date:  2006-03-13

3.  Physicochemical substance properties as indicators for unreliable exposure in microplate-based bioassays.

Authors:  Janet Riedl; Rolf Altenburger
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2007-02-02       Impact factor: 7.086

4.  Comparative sensitivity of Selenastrum capricornutum and Lemna minor to sixteen herbicides.

Authors:  J F Fairchild; D S Ruessler; P S Haverland; A R Carlson
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 5.  Triclosan: a widely used biocide and its link to antibiotics.

Authors:  H P Schweizer
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2001-08-07       Impact factor: 2.742

6.  Does the effect of herbicide pulse exposure on aquatic plants depend on Kow or mode of action?

Authors:  Nina Cedergreen; Lone Andersen; Charlotte Frihauge Olesen; Hans Henrik Spliid; Jens Carl Streibig
Journal:  Aquat Toxicol       Date:  2004-12-28       Impact factor: 4.964

7.  Biochemical responses of the aquatic higher plant Lemna gibba to a mixture of copper and 1,2-dihydroxyanthraquinone: synergistic toxicity via reactive oxygen species.

Authors:  T Sudhakar Babu; Sridevi Tripuranthakam; Bruce M Greenberg
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.742

8.  Chlorophyll fluorescence as a bioindicator of effects on growth in aquatic macrophytes from mixtures of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.

Authors:  C A Marwood; K R Solomon; B M Greenberg
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.742

9.  Aquatic toxicity of triclosan.

Authors:  David R Orvos; Donald J Versteeg; Josef Inauen; Marie Capdevielle; Arthur Rothenstein; Virginia Cunningham
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.742

10.  Comparison of different physiological parameter responses in Lemna minor and Scenedesmus obliquus exposed to herbicide flumioxazin.

Authors:  Laure Geoffroy; Cécile Frankart; Philippe Eullaffroy
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 8.071

View more
  6 in total

1.  Comparing growth development of Myriophyllum spp. in laboratory and field experiments for ecotoxicological testing.

Authors:  Katja Knauer; Silvia Mohr; Ute Feiler
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 2.  Occurrence and toxicity of antimicrobial triclosan and by-products in the environment.

Authors:  Gilles Bedoux; Benoit Roig; Olivier Thomas; Virginie Dupont; Barbara Le Bot
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2011-11-05       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Algicidal activity of thiazolidinedione derivatives against harmful algal blooming species.

Authors:  Yeon-Mi Kim; Ying Wu; Thi Uyen Duong; Seul-Gi Jung; Si Wouk Kim; Hoon Cho; Eonseon Jin
Journal:  Mar Biotechnol (NY)       Date:  2011-11-13       Impact factor: 3.619

Review 4.  Integrated ecological risk assessment of dioxin compounds.

Authors:  Seyedeh Belin Tavakoly Sany; Rosli Hashim; Majid Rezayi; Mohammad Azizur Rahman; Bi Bi Marzieh Razavizadeh; Ebrahim Abouzari-lotf; David J Karlen
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-05-09       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Noninvasive determination of toxic stress biomarkers by high-throughput screening of photoautotrophic cell suspension cultures with multicolor fluorescence imaging.

Authors:  Anna Segečová; María Luisa Pérez-Bueno; Matilde Barón; Jan Červený; Thomas Georg Roitsch
Journal:  Plant Methods       Date:  2019-08-24       Impact factor: 4.993

6.  Chlorophyll Fluorescence Imaging-Based Duckweed Phenotyping to Assess Acute Phytotoxic Effects.

Authors:  Viktor Oláh; Anna Hepp; Muhammad Irfan; Ilona Mészáros
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-14
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.