Literature DB >> 22057082

Determination of vertebral and femoral trabecular morphology and stiffness using a flat-panel C-arm-based CT approach.

Lars Mulder1, Bert van Rietbergen, Niels J Noordhoek, Keita Ito.   

Abstract

The importance of assessing trabecular architecture together with bone mineral density to determine bone stiffness and fracture risk in osteoporosis has been well established. However, no imaging modalities are available to assess trabecular architecture at clinically relevant sites in the axial skeleton. Recently developed flat-panel CT devices, however, offer resolutions that are potentially good enough to resolve bone architecture at these sites. The goal of the present study was to investigate how accurate trabecular architecture and stiffness can be determined based on images from such a device (XperCT, Philips Healthcare). Ten cadaver human C3 vertebrae, twelve T12 vertebrae and 12 proximal femora were scanned with XperCT while mimicking in-vivo scanning conditions and compared to scans of the same bones with microCT. Standard segmentation and morphology quantification algorithms were applied as well as finite element (FE) simulation based on segmented and gray value images. Results showed that mean trabecular separation (Tb.Sp) and number (Tb.N) can be accurately determined at all sites. The accuracy of other parameters, however, depended on the site. For T12 no other structural parameters could be accurately quantified and no FE-results could be obtained from segmented images. When using gray-level images, however, accurate determination of cancellous bone stiffness was possible. For the C3 vertebrae and proximal femora, mean bone volume fraction (BV/TV), Tb.Sp, Tb.N, and anisotropy (C3 only) could be determined accurately. For Tb.Th, structure model index (SMI, femur only), and anisotropy good correlations were obtained but the values were not determined accurately. FE simulations based on segmented images were accurate for the C3 vertebrae, but severely underestimated bone stiffness for the femur. Here also, this was improved by using the gray value models. In conclusion, XperCT does provide a resolution that is good enough to determine trabecular architecture, but the signal to noise ratio is key to the accuracy of the morphology measurement. When the trabeculae are thick e.g. in the femur or the noise is low, e.g. cervical spine, architecture and stiffness could be determined accurately, but when the trabeculae are thin and the noise is high, e.g. thoracic spine, architecture could not be determined accurately and the connectivity was lost and hence no mechanical properties could be calculated directly.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22057082     DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2011.10.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  9 in total

1.  Optimal sample volumes of human trabecular bone in μCT analysis within vertebral body and femoral head.

Authors:  Xin-Xin Wen; Chun-Lin Zong; Chao Xu; Xiang-Yu Ma; Fa-Qi Wang; Ya-Fei Feng; Ya-Bo Yan; Wei Lei
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-10-15

2.  Locally measured microstructural parameters are better associated with vertebral strength than whole bone density.

Authors:  J Hazrati Marangalou; F Eckstein; V Kuhn; K Ito; M Cataldi; F Taddei; B van Rietbergen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Finite Element-Based Mechanical Assessment of Bone Quality on the Basis of In Vivo Images.

Authors:  Dieter H Pahr; Philippe K Zysset
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 5.096

4.  Heterogeneity of bone microstructure in the femoral head in patients with osteoporosis: an ex vivo HR-pQCT study.

Authors:  Ko Chiba; Andrew J Burghardt; Makoto Osaki; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  Modeling and evaluation of a high-resolution CMOS detector for cone-beam CT of the extremities.

Authors:  Qian Cao; Alejandro Sisniega; Michael Brehler; J Webster Stayman; John Yorkston; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen; Wojciech Zbijewski
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Open-porous magnesium-based scaffolds withstand in vitro corrosion under cyclic loading: A mechanistic study.

Authors:  Roxane Bonithon; Colin Lupton; Marta Roldo; Joseph Nicholas Dunlop; Gordon William Blunn; Frank Witte; Gianluca Tozzi
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2022-04-29

7.  Trabecular bone structure analysis of the spine using clinical MDCT: can it predict vertebral bone strength?

Authors:  Thomas Baum; Martin Gräbeldinger; Christoph Räth; Eduardo Grande Garcia; Rainer Burgkart; Janina M Patsch; Ernst J Rummeny; Thomas M Link; Jan S Bauer
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2013-04-20       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  In-vivo assessment of femoral bone strength using Finite Element Analysis (FEA) based on routine MDCT imaging: a preliminary study on patients with vertebral fractures.

Authors:  Hans Liebl; Eduardo Grande Garcia; Fabian Holzner; Peter B Noel; Rainer Burgkart; Ernst J Rummeny; Thomas Baum; Jan S Bauer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A finite element analysis of relationship between fracture, implant and tibial tunnel.

Authors:  Yiqun Wang; Erpeng Qi; Lianyou Wang; Jiahe Tian; Xiaojun Zhang; Lu Xue
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.