Ko Chiba1, Andrew J Burghardt, Makoto Osaki, Sharmila Majumdar. 1. Musculoskeletal Quantitative Imaging Research Group, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. kohchiba@estate.ocn.ne.jp
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Trabecular bone in the femoral head has a complicated and heterogeneous structure with few studies having analyzed heterogeneity in this structure quantitatively. We analyze trabecular bone microstructure in the femoral head with osteoporosis (OP) using high resolution peripheral quantitative CT (HR-pQCT) to investigate its regional characteristics. METHODS: Fifteen femoral heads extracted from female OP patients with femoral neck fracture (85 ± 7, 67-94 years) were scanned by HR-pQCT at 41 μm voxel size. The femoral head was segmented into 15 regions (3 longitudinal regions: superior, center, and inferior, and 5 axial subregions: center, medial, lateral, anterior, posterior). Of these 15 regions, five were excluded due to overlap with the fracture site, leaving a total of 10 regions of cancellous bone microstructures to be quantitatively assessed using the following parameters: bone volume fraction, trabecular thickness, number, separation, connectivity density, structure model index, and degree and orientation of anisotropy. These parameters were compared among each region. RESULTS: Trabecular bone at the center, superior, and supero-posterior regions of the femoral head had higher bone volume, trabecular number, thickness, narrower bone marrow spaces, higher connectivity and anisotropy, and more plate-like structure. This plate-like structure ran supero-inferiorly and antero-posteriorly at the superior and center regions. Bone volume at the anterior, posterior, and medial regions was almost half of the central and superior regions. CONCLUSION: Significant heterogeneity of the trabecular bone microstructure in the OP femoral head was showed quantitatively in this study. These data offer new insight into bone microstructural anatomy and may prove to provide useful information on clinical medicine such as hip surgeries.
INTRODUCTION: Trabecular bone in the femoral head has a complicated and heterogeneous structure with few studies having analyzed heterogeneity in this structure quantitatively. We analyze trabecular bone microstructure in the femoral head withosteoporosis (OP) using high resolution peripheral quantitative CT (HR-pQCT) to investigate its regional characteristics. METHODS: Fifteen femoral heads extracted from female OP patients withfemoral neck fracture (85 ± 7, 67-94 years) were scanned by HR-pQCT at 41 μm voxel size. The femoral head was segmented into 15 regions (3 longitudinal regions: superior, center, and inferior, and 5 axial subregions: center, medial, lateral, anterior, posterior). Of these 15 regions, five were excluded due to overlap withthe fracture site, leaving a total of 10 regions of cancellous bone microstructures to be quantitatively assessed using the following parameters: bone volume fraction, trabecular thickness, number, separation, connectivity density, structure model index, and degree and orientation of anisotropy. These parameters were compared among each region. RESULTS: Trabecular bone at the center, superior, and supero-posterior regions of the femoral head had higher bone volume, trabecular number, thickness, narrower bone marrow spaces, higher connectivity and anisotropy, and more plate-like structure. This plate-like structure ran supero-inferiorly and antero-posteriorly at the superior and center regions. Bone volume at the anterior, posterior, and medial regions was almost half of the central and superior regions. CONCLUSION: Significant heterogeneity of the trabecular bone microstructure in the OP femoral head was showed quantitatively in this study. These data offer new insight into bone microstructural anatomy and may prove to provide useful information on clinical medicine such as hip surgeries.
Authors: Thomas L Mueller; David Christen; Steve Sandercott; Steven K Boyd; Bert van Rietbergen; Felix Eckstein; Eva-Maria Lochmüller; Ralph Müller; G Harry van Lenthe Journal: Bone Date: 2011-03-02 Impact factor: 4.398
Authors: Petar Milovanovic; Danijela Djonic; Robert Percy Marshall; Michael Hahn; Slobodan Nikolic; Vladimir Zivkovic; Michael Amling; Marija Djuric Journal: Bone Date: 2011-09-22 Impact factor: 4.398
Authors: Markus B Huber; Julio Carballido-Gamio; Jan S Bauer; Thomas Baum; Felix Eckstein; Eva M Lochmüller; Sharmila Majumdar; Thomas M Link Journal: Radiology Date: 2008-05 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Gregory Chang; Stephen Honig; Ryan Brown; Cem M Deniz; Kenneth A Egol; James S Babb; Ravinder R Regatte; Chamith S Rajapakse Journal: Radiology Date: 2014-04-02 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Kenneth E S Poole; Linda Skingle; Andrew H Gee; Thomas D Turmezei; Fjola Johannesdottir; Karen Blesic; Collette Rose; Madhavi Vindlacheruvu; Simon Donell; Jan Vaculik; Pavel Dungl; Martin Horak; Jan J Stepan; Jonathan Reeve; Graham M Treece Journal: Bone Date: 2016-10-21 Impact factor: 4.398
Authors: Cem M Deniz; Siyuan Xiang; R Spencer Hallyburton; Arakua Welbeck; James S Babb; Stephen Honig; Kyunghyun Cho; Gregory Chang Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-11-07 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Heather A Cole; Tetsuro Ohba; Jiro Ichikawa; Jeffry S Nyman; Justin M M Cates; Hirotaka Haro; Herbert S Schwartz; Jonathan G Schoenecker Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-06-03 Impact factor: 3.240