Literature DB >> 22056220

The practice of carotid revascularization in a large metropolitan population.

Matthew L Flaherty1, Brett Kissela, Heidi Sucharew, Kathleen Alwell, Charles J Moomaw, Daniel Woo, Pooja Khatri, Simona Ferioli, Opeolu Adeoye, Jason Mackey, Joseph P Broderick, Dawn Kleindorfer.   

Abstract

Carotid endartectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) reduce the risk of stroke when performed with acceptable perioperative morbidity and mortality. Studies from the 1980s in the greater Cincinnati/northern Kentucky population showed that perioperative risk after CEA exceeded the recommended boundaries of 3.0% for asymptomatic stenosis and 6.0% for symptomatic stenosis. We investigated the indications and outcomes for CEA and CAS in the same population during 2005. We identified all residents of the greater Cincinnati/northern Kentucky region who underwent CEA or CAS at any local hospital during 2005. Identified cases of transient ischemic attack or stroke occurring before or after CEA or CAS were abstracted by study nurses and reviewed by a study physician. The main outcome of interest was 30-day risk of stroke or death after CEA or CAS. Events were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier statistics. Among approximately 1.3 million greater Cincinnati/northern Kentucky residents, 525 CEAs were performed, 343 (65%) for asymptomatic stenosis and 182 (35%) for symptomatic stenosis. There were 43 CAS procedures, 23 (53%) for asymptomatic stenosis and 20 (47%) for symptomatic stenosis. The 30-day perioperative risk of stroke or death after CEA was 3.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8%-5.9%) for asymptomatic stenosis and 6.3% (95% CI, 3.5%-11.1%) for symptomatic stenosis. The 30-day perioperative risk of stroke or death after CAS was 4.6% (95% CI, 0.7%-28.1%) for asymptomatic stenosis and 21.1% (95% CI, 8.5%-46.8%) for symptomatic stenosis. Point estimates for perioperative risk after CEA were improved from previous studies but remained above the recommended benchmarks. The number of CAS procedures was low, but the perioperative risk was significant.
Copyright © 2013 National Stroke Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22056220      PMCID: PMC3306844          DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2011.07.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis        ISSN: 1052-3057            Impact factor:   2.136


  22 in total

1.  Stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis.

Authors:  Thomas G Brott; Robert W Hobson; George Howard; Gary S Roubin; Wayne M Clark; William Brooks; Ariane Mackey; Michael D Hill; Pierre P Leimgruber; Alice J Sheffet; Virginia J Howard; Wesley S Moore; Jenifer H Voeks; L Nelson Hopkins; Donald E Cutlip; David J Cohen; Jeffrey J Popma; Robert D Ferguson; Stanley N Cohen; Joseph L Blackshear; Frank L Silver; J P Mohr; Brajesh K Lal; James F Meschia
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Ischemic stroke subtypes: a population-based study of incidence and risk factors.

Authors:  G W Petty; R D Brown; J P Whisnant; J D Sicks; W M O'Fallon; D O Wiebers
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  Geographic variation in carotid revascularization among Medicare beneficiaries, 2003-2006.

Authors:  Manesh R Patel; Melissa A Greiner; Lisa D DiMartino; Kevin A Schulman; Pamela W Duncan; David B Matchar; Lesley H Curtis
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2010-07-26

Review 4.  Guidelines for carotid endarterectomy. A multidisciplinary consensus statement from the Ad Hoc Committee, American Heart Association.

Authors:  W S Moore; H J Barnett; H G Beebe; E F Bernstein; B J Brener; T Brott; L R Caplan; A Day; J Goldstone; R W Hobson
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1995-01-15       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Analysis of pooled data from the randomised controlled trials of endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis.

Authors:  P M Rothwell; M Eliasziw; S A Gutnikov; A J Fox; D W Taylor; M R Mayberg; C P Warlow; H J M Barnett
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-01-11       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Carotid artery stenting compared with endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis (International Carotid Stenting Study): an interim analysis of a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Jörg Ederle; Joanna Dobson; Roland L Featherstone; Leo H Bonati; H Bart van der Worp; Gert J de Borst; T Hauw Lo; Peter Gaines; Paul J Dorman; Sumaira Macdonald; Philippe A Lyrer; Johanna M Hendriks; Charles McCollum; Paul J Nederkoorn; Martin M Brown
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  The practice of carotid endarterectomy in a large metropolitan area.

Authors:  T Brott; K Thalinger
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1984 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  Stroke in a biracial population: the excess burden of stroke among blacks.

Authors:  Brett Kissela; Alexander Schneider; Dawn Kleindorfer; Jane Khoury; Rosemary Miller; Kathleen Alwell; Daniel Woo; Jerzy Szaflarski; James Gebel; Charles Moomaw; Arthur Pancioli; Edward Jauch; Rakesh Shukla; Joseph Broderick
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 7.914

9.  Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-05-10       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Changing patterns in the practice of carotid endarterectomy in a large metropolitan area.

Authors:  T G Brott; R J Labutta; R F Kempczinski
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1986-05-16       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  1 in total

1.  Reconstruction of carotid stenosis hemodynamics based on guidewire pressure data and computational modeling.

Authors:  Huy Dinh; Fernando Vinuela; Viktor Szeder; Kasra Khatibi; Lucido Ponce Mejia; Aichi Chien
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 3.079

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.