Literature DB >> 3701975

Changing patterns in the practice of carotid endarterectomy in a large metropolitan area.

T G Brott, R J Labutta, R F Kempczinski.   

Abstract

Changes in the practice of carotid endarterectomy were studied by review of all endarterectomies performed in the greater Cincinnati area during 1980 and from July 1983 through June 1984. The number of operations rose from 431 to 750 (74% increase). The perioperative stroke rate fell from 8.6% in 1980 to 5.1% in 1983-1984; operative mortality declined from 2.8% to 2.3%; and the combined stroke or death rate declined from 9.5% to 6.5%. Asymptomatic carotid artery disease was the indication for 50% of the endarterectomies during both time periods. The combined stroke or death rate for asymptomatic patients declined from 6.9% to 5.3%, but both rates were higher than the 3% suggested as acceptable for prophylactic carotid endarterectomy. We conclude that carotid endarterectomy is becoming an increasingly common procedure, that morbidity continues to decline, and that mortality continues to be significant. Citywide surgical morbidity and mortality remain excessive for patients with asymptomatic carotid disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3701975

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  12 in total

1.  Risk of carotid endarterectomy in the elderly.

Authors:  E S Fisher; D J Malenka; N A Solomon; T A Bubolz; F S Whaley; J E Wennberg
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Influence of projected complication rates on estimated appropriate use rates for carotid endarterectomy. Appropriateness Project Investigators. Academic Medical Center Consortium.

Authors:  D B Matchar; E Z Oddone; D C McCrory; L B Goldstein; P B Landsman; G Samsa; R H Brook; C Kamberg; L Hilborne; L Leape; R Horner
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Asymptomatic carotid stenosis: spare the knife.

Authors:  P Sandercock
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1987-05-30

4.  The practice of carotid revascularization in a large metropolitan population.

Authors:  Matthew L Flaherty; Brett Kissela; Heidi Sucharew; Kathleen Alwell; Charles J Moomaw; Daniel Woo; Pooja Khatri; Simona Ferioli; Opeolu Adeoye; Jason Mackey; Joseph P Broderick; Dawn Kleindorfer
Journal:  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 2.136

5.  A prospective study of vein patch angioplasty during carotid endarterectomy. Three-year results for 801 patients and 917 operations.

Authors:  N R Hertzer; E G Beven; P J O'Hara; L P Krajewski
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Pitfalls during carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  F G Diaz; J I Ausman; G M Malik
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.216

7.  Evaluating quality, cost-effective health care. Vascular database predicated on hospital discharge abstracts.

Authors:  W H Edwards; J A Morris; J M Jenkins; S M Bass; E J MacKenzie
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Safety of stenting and endarterectomy by symptomatic status in the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy Versus Stenting Trial (CREST).

Authors:  Frank L Silver; Ariane Mackey; Wayne M Clark; William Brooks; Carlos H Timaran; David Chiu; Larry B Goldstein; James F Meschia; Robert D Ferguson; Wesley S Moore; George Howard; Thomas G Brott
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 9.  Carotid endarterectomy for prevention of stroke.

Authors:  W S Moore
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1993-07

10.  Differential outcomes of carotid stenting and endarterectomy performed exclusively by vascular surgeons in the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST).

Authors:  Carlos H Timaran; Vito A Mantese; Mahmoud Malas; O William Brown; Brajesh K Lal; Wesley S Moore; Jenifer H Voeks; Thomas G Brott
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 4.268

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.