Literature DB >> 35359199

Reconstruction of carotid stenosis hemodynamics based on guidewire pressure data and computational modeling.

Huy Dinh1, Fernando Vinuela1, Viktor Szeder1, Kasra Khatibi1, Lucido Ponce Mejia1, Aichi Chien2.   

Abstract

A comparative analysis between intravascular guidewire-obtained and computational fluid dynamic (CFD) flow velocity and pressure data using simplified carotid stenosis models was performed. This information was used to evaluate the viability of using guidewire pressure data to provide inlet conditions for CFD flow, and to study the relationship between stenotic length and hemodynamic behavior. Carotid stenosis models differing in diameter and length were prepared and connected to a vascular pulsatile flow simulator. Time-dependent flow velocity and pressure measurements were taken by microcatheter guidewires and compared with CFD data. Guidewire and CFD-generated pressure profiles matched closely in all measurement locations. The guidewire was unable to reliably measure flow velocity at areas associated with higher CFD flow velocities (r = 0.92). CFD results showed that an increased length of stenosis generated expansive regions of elevated wall shear stress (WSS) within and distal to the stenosis. Low WSS was found immediately outside the stenosis outlet. An increase in stenotic length produced higher flow velocities with minimal lengthening of the distal high velocity flow jet due to faster dissipation of translational kinetic energy through turbulence. We found the accuracy of guidewire-obtained velocity measurements is limited to regions unaffected by disturbed flow. WSS and turbulence behavior distal to the stenosis may be important markers to evaluate the severity of atherosclerotic progression as a function of stenotic length.
© 2022. International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computational fluid dynamic; Guidewire flow measurements; Stenosis; Wall shear stress

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35359199      PMCID: PMC9036983          DOI: 10.1007/s11517-021-02463-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   3.079


  40 in total

1.  Atherosclerotic lesion size and vulnerability are determined by patterns of fluid shear stress.

Authors:  Caroline Cheng; Dennie Tempel; Rien van Haperen; Arjen van der Baan; Frank Grosveld; Mat J A P Daemen; Rob Krams; Rini de Crom
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-06-05       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Toward hemodynamic diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis based on ultrasound image data and computational modeling.

Authors:  Luísa C Sousa; Catarina F Castro; Carlos C António; André Miguel F Santos; Rosa Maria Dos Santos; Pedro Miguel A C Castro; Elsa Azevedo; João Manuel R S Tavares
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Population-based study of delays in carotid imaging and surgery and the risk of recurrent stroke.

Authors:  J F Fairhead; Z Mehta; P M Rothwell
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2005-08-09       Impact factor: 9.910

4.  CT angiographic analysis of carotid artery stenosis: comparison of manual assessment, semiautomatic vessel analysis, and digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  H M Silvennoinen; S Ikonen; L Soinne; M Railo; L Valanne
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Assessment of boundary conditions for CFD simulation in human carotid artery.

Authors:  Pengcheng Xu; Xin Liu; Heye Zhang; Dhanjoo Ghista; Dong Zhang; Changzheng Shi; Wenhua Huang
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2018-07-07

6.  Cardiac prognosis of patients with carotid stenosis and no history of coronary artery disease. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group 167.

Authors:  M I Chimowitz; D G Weiss; S L Cohen; M R Starling; R W Hobson
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  Fractional Flow Assessment for the Evaluation of Intracranial Atherosclerosis: A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  ZhongRong Miao; David S Liebeskind; WaiTing Lo; LiPing Liu; YueHua Pu; XinYi Leng; LiGang Song; XiaoTong Xu; BaiXue Jia; Feng Gao; DaPeng Mo; Xuan Sun; Lian Liu; Ning Ma; Bo Wang; YiLong Wang; YongJun Wang
Journal:  Interv Neurol       Date:  2016-04-01

8.  Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-05-10       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Numerical modeling of MR angiography for validation of image-driven quantitative diagnosis of intracranial aneurysm and carotid stenosis.

Authors:  Artur Klepaczko; Piotr Szczypiński; Michał Strzelecki; Andrzej Materka
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2014-07

10.  Retrospective Study of Hemodynamic Changes Before and After Carotid Stenosis Formation by Vessel Surface Repairing.

Authors:  Xiao Li; Beibei Sun; Huilin Zhao; Xiaoqian Ge; Fuyou Liang; Xuanyu Li; Jianrong Xu; Xiaosheng Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.