Literature DB >> 22054995

Correlation between preoperative biometry and posterior chamber phakic Visian Implantable Collamer Lens vaulting.

Dong-Hoon Lee1, Sung-Ho Choi, Eui-Sang Chung, Tae-Young Chung.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate (1) the effect of preoperative biometric factors on vault error and (2) the difference in achieved vault (AV) and expected vault (EV) after Visian Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) implantation.
DESIGN: Retrospective, comparative, interventional case series. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 129 eyes of 75 myopic patients treated with ICL.
METHODS: On the basis of the hypothesis that ICL vaulting is due mainly to an inequality between ICL size and the horizontal sulcus-to-sulcus distance (STS) or horizontal white-to-white distance (WTW), we assumed that EV would linearly correlate with ICL horizontal compression, as demonstrated in an ex vivo experiment. Expected vault was defined as follows: EV(WTW[or STS]) = (ICL size - WTW[or STS]) × 1100 μm. With the use of preoperative data as independent variables (including age, anterior chamber depth measured from the central corneal endothelium to the anterior lens capsule, STS, WTW, ICL size, ICL size - STS, ICL size - WTW, STS - WTW, ICL diopter, and mean K-reading), a multiple regression analysis was performed to evaluate meaningful factors affecting AV. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Preoperative ICL EV and postoperative ICL AV.
RESULTS: Mean AV was 518.6 (standard deviation [SD] 258.4 μm). The EV(WTW) was 626.6 (SD 220.9 μm), and EV was 242.8 (SD 364.2 μm). Higher ICL compression tended to result in a lower AV than EV, whereas lower ICL compression tended to result in a higher AV than EV. The ICL size - STS was more highly correlated with AV than the ICL size - WTW (Pearson correlation coefficient 0.425 vs. 0.247). Stepwise multivariate regression showed that, in order of the strength of the contribution, ICL size - STS, ICL size, age, and K-reading were significant factors associated with AV (adjusted R(2)=0.369), but ICL size - WTW was not. Among the meaningful factors, ICL size - STS, ICL size, and K-reading were positively correlated with AV, whereas age was negatively correlated.
CONCLUSIONS: The ICL vaulting based on only the horizontal compression could not be quantitatively predicted. Additional factors, such as vertical compression by the iris, dampening effect of the ciliary sulcus structure, or innate ICL vault, should be considered to avoid unexpected vaulting after ICL implantation.
Copyright © 2012 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22054995     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.07.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  21 in total

1.  Comparison of Vault Measurements Using a Swept-Source OCT-Based Optical Biometer and Anterior Segment OCT.

Authors:  Yali Du; Chuang Jin; Shengjie Yin; Geng Wang; Qian Ma; Yuancun Li; Binyao Chen; Hongxi Wang; Kunliang Qiu; Mingzhi Zhang
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-23

2.  Clinical Prediction of Inadequate Vault in Eyes With Thick Lens After Implantable Collamer Lens Implantation Using Iris Morphology.

Authors:  Zhikun Yang; Lihui Meng; Xinyu Zhao; Youxin Chen; Yan Luo
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-09

3.  Inter-eye and postoperative prediction of vault after implantation of EVO + Visian phakic implantable collamer lens.

Authors:  Elena Martínez-Plaza; Alberto López-Miguel; Alberto López-de la Rosa; Miguel J Maldonado
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 2.029

4.  Short-term changes in and preoperative factors affecting vaulting after posterior chamber phakic Implantable Collamer Lens implantation.

Authors:  Qiu-Jian Zhu; Wen-Jing Chen; Wei-Jian Zhu; Hai-Xiang Xiao; Man-Hui Zhu; Lie Ma; You Yuan; E Song
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 2.209

Review 5.  Meta-analysis and review: effectiveness, safety, and central port design of the intraocular collamer lens.

Authors:  Mark Packer
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-06-09

6.  Comparison of early changes in and factors affecting vault following posterior chamber phakic Implantable Collamer Lens implantation without and with a central hole (ICL V4 and ICL V4c).

Authors:  Xun Chen; Huamao Miao; Rajeev Krishnan Naidu; Xiaoying Wang; Xingtao Zhou
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 2.209

7.  Etiology and Management of Raised Intraocular Pressure following Posterior Chamber Phakic Intraocular Lens Implantation in Myopic Eyes.

Authors:  Sirisha Senthil; Nikhil S Choudhari; Pravin K Vaddavalli; Somasheila Murthy; Jagadesh C Reddy; Chandra S Garudadri
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A comparison of visual outcome and rotational stability of two types of toric implantable collamer lenses (TICL) : V4 versus V4c.

Authors:  Joo Hyun; Dong Hui Lim; Doo Ri Eo; Sungsoon Hwang; Eui-Sang Chung; Tae-Young Chung
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Buffering zone of implantable Collamer lens sizing in V4c.

Authors:  Seung Wan Nam; Dong Hui Lim; Joo Hyun; Eui-Sang Chung; Tae-Young Chung
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 2.209

10.  Adjustment formulae to improve the correlation of white-to-white measurement with direct measurement of the ciliary sulcus diameter by ultrasound biomicroscopy.

Authors:  Seyed Javad Hashemian; Majid Mohebbi; Mehdi Yaseri; Mohammad Ebrahim Jafari; Shadrokh Nabili; Seyed Mahyar Hashemian; Mahsa Sadat Hashemian
Journal:  J Curr Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-12-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.