Finnian R Mc Causland1, Sushrut S Waikar2. 1. Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. Electronic address: fmccausland@partners.org. 2. Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The rapid reduction in plasma osmolality during hemodialysis (HD) may induce temporary gradients that promote the movement of water from the extracellular to the intracellular compartment, predisposing to the development of intradialytic hypotension (IDH). STUDY DESIGN: Observational cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 3,142 prevalent patients receiving thrice-weekly HD from a single dialysis provider organization. PREDICTOR: Predialysis calculated plasma osmolarity (calculated after the 2-day interval as 2 × serum sodium + serum urea nitrogen/2.8 + serum glucose/18). OUTCOME: Magnitude of systolic blood pressure (SBP) decline (predialysis SBP - nadir intradialytic SBP) and risk of IDH (SBP decline > 35 or nadir SBP < 90 mm Hg). MEASUREMENTS: Unadjusted and multivariable-adjusted generalized linear models were fit to estimate the association of calculated osmolarity with intradialytic SBP decline and the odds of developing IDH. RESULTS: Mean age of participants was 62.6±15.2 (SD) years, 57.1% were men, and 61.0% had diabetes. Mean predialysis calculated osmolarity during follow-up was 306.4 ± 9.5 mOsm/L. After case-mix adjustment, each 10-mOsm/L increase in predialysis calculated osmolarity was associated with 1.48 (95% CI, 0.86-2.09) mm Hg (P < 0.001) greater decline in intradialytic SBP and 10% greater odds of IDH (OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.05-1.15). In adjusted models, lower predialysis sodium and higher serum urea nitrogen and serum glucose levels were associated with greater decline in intradialytic SBP. LIMITATIONS: Measured serum osmolality, timing of changes in intradialytic osmolality, dialysate osmolality, and dialysate temperature were not available. CONCLUSIONS: Higher predialysis calculated osmolarity is associated with greater decline in intradialytic SBP and greater risk of IDH in maintenance HD patients. Strategies to minimize rapid shifts in osmolality should be tested prospectively to minimize excess SBP decline in susceptible patients.
BACKGROUND: The rapid reduction in plasma osmolality during hemodialysis (HD) may induce temporary gradients that promote the movement of water from the extracellular to the intracellular compartment, predisposing to the development of intradialytic hypotension (IDH). STUDY DESIGN: Observational cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 3,142 prevalent patients receiving thrice-weekly HD from a single dialysis provider organization. PREDICTOR: Predialysis calculated plasma osmolarity (calculated after the 2-day interval as 2 × serum sodium + serum ureanitrogen/2.8 + serum glucose/18). OUTCOME: Magnitude of systolic blood pressure (SBP) decline (predialysis SBP - nadir intradialytic SBP) and risk of IDH (SBP decline > 35 or nadir SBP < 90 mm Hg). MEASUREMENTS: Unadjusted and multivariable-adjusted generalized linear models were fit to estimate the association of calculated osmolarity with intradialytic SBP decline and the odds of developing IDH. RESULTS: Mean age of participants was 62.6±15.2 (SD) years, 57.1% were men, and 61.0% had diabetes. Mean predialysis calculated osmolarity during follow-up was 306.4 ± 9.5 mOsm/L. After case-mix adjustment, each 10-mOsm/L increase in predialysis calculated osmolarity was associated with 1.48 (95% CI, 0.86-2.09) mm Hg (P < 0.001) greater decline in intradialytic SBP and 10% greater odds of IDH (OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.05-1.15). In adjusted models, lower predialysis sodium and higher serum ureanitrogen and serum glucose levels were associated with greater decline in intradialytic SBP. LIMITATIONS: Measured serum osmolality, timing of changes in intradialytic osmolality, dialysate osmolality, and dialysate temperature were not available. CONCLUSIONS: Higher predialysis calculated osmolarity is associated with greater decline in intradialytic SBP and greater risk of IDH in maintenance HDpatients. Strategies to minimize rapid shifts in osmolality should be tested prospectively to minimize excess SBP decline in susceptible patients.
Authors: Manfred Hecking; Angelo Karaboyas; Marlies Antlanger; Rajiv Saran; Volker Wizemann; Charles Chazot; Hugh Rayner; Walter H Hörl; Ronald L Pisoni; Bruce M Robinson; Gere Sunder-Plassmann; Ulrich Moissl; Peter Kotanko; Nathan W Levin; Marcus D Säemann; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh; Friedrich K Port; Peter Wabel Journal: Am J Nephrol Date: 2013-07-06 Impact factor: 3.754
Authors: Chethan P Venkatasubba Rao; Eric M Bershad; Eusebia Calvillo; Nelson Maldonado; Rahul Damani; Sreedhar Mandayam; Jose I Suarez Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: Finnian R Mc Causland; Brian Claggett; Venkata S Sabbisetti; Petr Jarolim; Sushrut S Waikar Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2019-04-27 Impact factor: 8.860