Literature DB >> 22049861

Prospective study of a cementless, mobile-bearing, third generation total ankle prosthesis.

Katja Schenk1, Sebastian Lieske, Michael John, Konrad Franke, Stéphane Mouly, Emmanuel Lizee, Wolfram Neumann.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The SALTO total ankle prosthesis is a noncemented mobile bearing anatomic design characterized by dual Ti-HA coating. This study reviews our results with this prosthesis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2001 and 2007, 413 consecutive SALTO prostheses were implanted in our institution in 215 women and 198 men, aged 57.1 +/- 11.9 years. At the last visit, 401 implants (47% in the left ankle) were available with a mean followup of 29 (range, 1 to 84) months.
RESULTS: Based on the results of the 218 patients with at least 2 years of postoperative followup, the 5-year estimated survivorship, with the primary end-point being implant removal, was 86.6% and ranged from 85.1% in patients with post-traumatic osteoarthritis to 95.6% in those with rheumatoid arthritis. The AOFAS score increased from 50.9 +/- 16.8 points preoperatively to 82.2 +/- 14 points at followup (mean difference, 31.1 +/- 1.4, 95% confidence interval (C.I.) for the difference, 28.3 to 33.8, p < 0.001). Visual analog scale for pain decreased from 7.4 +/- 1.1 preoperatively to 2.0 +/- 2.0 postoperatively (mean difference, -5.4 +/- 0.7, 95% C.I. for the difference, -5.6 to -5.2, p < 0.001). Flexion/extension ROM increased from 25.2 +/- 14.1 degrees to 33.1 +/- 13.6 degrees at the last followup visit (mean difference, 7.9 +/- 0.5 degrees, 95% C.I. for the difference, 4.3 to 7.2, p < 0.001), while pronation/supination ROM increased from 23.8 +/- 13.7 degrees to 25.4 +/- 14.5 degrees (mean difference, 1.6 +/- 0.7 degrees, 95% C.I. for the difference, 0.9 to 2.2, p = 0.005).
CONCLUSION: The SALTO prosthesis provided good clinical and functional results and we believe helps validate the concept of anatomic replacement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22049861     DOI: 10.3113/FAI.2011.0755

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle Int        ISSN: 1071-1007            Impact factor:   2.827


  6 in total

Review 1.  Total ankle replacement.

Authors:  Alexej Barg; Matthias D Wimmer; Martin Wiewiorski; Dieter C Wirtz; Geert I Pagenstert; Victor Valderrabano
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  Intermediate to long-term clinical outcomes and survival analysis of the Salto Mobile Bearing total ankle prothesis.

Authors:  C Stadler; M Stöbich; B Ruhs; C Kaufmann; L Pisecky; S Stevoska; T Gotterbarm; M C Klotz
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 3.  Total ankle arthroplasty versus ankle arthrodesis-a comparison of outcomes over the last decade.

Authors:  Cort D Lawton; Bennet A Butler; Robert G Dekker; Adam Prescott; Anish R Kadakia
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 2.359

4.  Outcome after 52 Salto Ankle Prostheses Implanted by a Single Surgeon.

Authors:  Frank W M Faber; Monique J L Mastboom; Sabine T van Vliet-Koppert; Ilse C E Bouman; Paulien M van Kampen
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2018-08-01

5.  [Implantation of a Salto 2 total ankle prosthesis].

Authors:  S Lieske; K Schenk; H W Neumann; M John
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 1.154

6.  Total ankle arthroplasty and ankle arthrodesis affect the biomechanics of the inner foot differently.

Authors:  Yan Wang; Duo Wai-Chi Wong; Qitao Tan; Zengyong Li; Ming Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.