Literature DB >> 22049412

The hippocampus supports both recollection and familiarity when memories are strong.

Christine N Smith1, John T Wixted, Larry R Squire.   

Abstract

Recognition memory is thought to consist of two component processes--recollection and familiarity. It has been suggested that the hippocampus supports recollection, while adjacent cortex supports familiarity. However, the qualitative experiences of recollection and familiarity are typically confounded with a quantitative difference in memory strength (recollection > familiarity). Thus, the question remains whether the hippocampus might in fact support familiarity-based memories whenever they are as strong as recollection-based memories. We addressed this problem in a novel way by using the Remember/Know procedure, which allowed us to explicitly match the confidence and accuracy of Remember and Know decisions. As in earlier studies, recollected items had higher accuracy and confidence than familiar items, and hippocampal activity was higher for recollected items than for familiar items. Furthermore, hippocampal activity was similar for familiar items, misses, and correct rejections. When the accuracy and confidence of recollected and familiar items were matched, the findings were dramatically different. Hippocampal activity was now similar for recollected and familiar items. Importantly, hippocampal activity was also greater for familiar items than for misses or correct rejections (as well as for recollected items vs misses or correct rejections). Our findings suggest that the hippocampus supports both recollection and familiarity when memories are strong.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22049412      PMCID: PMC3220416          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3438-11.2011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  51 in total

1.  Remembering episodes: a selective role for the hippocampus during retrieval.

Authors:  L L Eldridge; B J Knowlton; C S Furmanski; S Y Bookheimer; S A Engel
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  When zero is not zero: the problem of ambiguous baseline conditions in fMRI.

Authors:  C E Stark; L R Squire
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-10-09       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Multiple routes to memory: distinct medial temporal lobe processes build item and source memories.

Authors:  Lila Davachi; Jason P Mitchell; Anthony D Wagner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-02-10       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Brain activity underlying encoding and retrieval of source memory.

Authors:  Selene Cansino; Pierre Maquet; Raymond J Dolan; Michael D Rugg
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Remember-know: a matter of confidence.

Authors:  John C Dunn
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  A continuous dual-process model of remember/know judgments.

Authors:  John T Wixted; Laura Mickes
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Improved assessment of significant activation in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI): use of a cluster-size threshold.

Authors:  S D Forman; J D Cohen; M Fitzgerald; W F Eddy; M A Mintun; D C Noll
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages.

Authors:  R W Cox
Journal:  Comput Biomed Res       Date:  1996-06

9.  Source memory impairment in patients with frontal lobe lesions.

Authors:  J S Janowsky; A P Shimamura; L R Squire
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 10.  Frontal lobes, memory, and aging.

Authors:  M Moscovitch; G Winocur
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1995-12-15       Impact factor: 5.691

View more
  25 in total

1.  Distinct medial temporal contributions to different forms of recognition in amnestic mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Carmen Westerberg; Andrew Mayes; Susan M Florczak; Yufen Chen; Jessica Creery; Todd Parrish; Sandra Weintraub; M-Marsel Mesulam; Paul J Reber; Ken A Paller
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Cortical reinstatement mediates the relationship between content-specific encoding activity and subsequent recollection decisions.

Authors:  Alan M Gordon; Jesse Rissman; Roozbeh Kiani; Anthony D Wagner
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Late Positive Component Event-related Potential Amplitude Predicts Long-term Classroom-based Learning.

Authors:  Katherine W Turk; Ala'a A Elshaar; Rebecca G Deason; Nadine C Heyworth; Corrine Nagle; Bruno Frustace; Sean Flannery; Ann Zumwalt; Andrew E Budson
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Brain mechanisms of successful recognition through retrieval of semantic context.

Authors:  Kristin E Flegal; Alejandro Marín-Gutiérrez; J Daniel Ragland; Charan Ranganath
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 5.  Item memory, context memory and the hippocampus: fMRI evidence.

Authors:  Michael D Rugg; Kaia L Vilberg; Julia T Mattson; Sarah S Yu; Jeffrey D Johnson; Maki Suzuki
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 6.  Memory Retrieval in Mice and Men.

Authors:  Aya Ben-Yakov; Yadin Dudai; Mark R Mayford
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 10.005

7.  The chemotherapeutic agent paclitaxel selectively impairs reversal learning while sparing prior learning, new learning and episodic memory.

Authors:  Danielle Panoz-Brown; Lawrence M Carey; Alexandra E Smith; Meredith Gentry; Christina M Sluka; Hannah E Corbin; Jie-En Wu; Andrea G Hohmann; Jonathon D Crystal
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2017-08-12       Impact factor: 2.877

Review 8.  Brain networks underlying episodic memory retrieval.

Authors:  Michael D Rugg; Kaia L Vilberg
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 6.627

9.  Event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging of a low dose of dexmedetomidine that impairs long-term memory.

Authors:  Hiroki R Hayama; Kristin M Drumheller; Mark Mastromonaco; Christopher Reist; Lawrence F Cahill; Michael T Alkire
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 10.  The ventral visual pathway: an expanded neural framework for the processing of object quality.

Authors:  Dwight J Kravitz; Kadharbatcha S Saleem; Chris I Baker; Leslie G Ungerleider; Mortimer Mishkin
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 20.229

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.