Literature DB >> 20836613

A continuous dual-process model of remember/know judgments.

John T Wixted1, Laura Mickes.   

Abstract

The dual-process theory of recognition memory holds that recognition decisions can be based on recollection or familiarity, and the remember/know procedure is widely used to investigate those 2 processes. Dual-process theory in general and the remember/know procedure in particular have been challenged by an alternative strength-based interpretation based on signal-detection theory, which holds that remember judgments simply reflect stronger memories than do know judgments. Although supported by a considerable body of research, the signal-detection account is difficult to reconcile with G. Mandler's (1980) classic "butcher-on-the-bus" phenomenon (i.e., strong, familiarity-based recognition). In this article, a new signal-detection model is proposed that does not deny either the validity of dual-process theory or the possibility that remember/know judgments can-when used in the right way-help to distinguish between memories that are largely recollection based from those that are largely familiarity based. It does, however, agree with all prior signal-detection-based critiques of the remember/know procedure, which hold that, as it is ordinarily used, the procedure mainly distinguishes strong memories from weak memories (not recollection from familiarity).

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20836613     DOI: 10.1037/a0020874

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Rev        ISSN: 0033-295X            Impact factor:   8.934


  93 in total

1.  Hippocampal activity during recognition memory co-varies with the accuracy and confidence of source memory judgments.

Authors:  Sarah S Yu; Jeffrey D Johnson; Michael D Rugg
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 3.899

2.  Production benefits both recollection and familiarity.

Authors:  Jason D Ozubko; Nigel Gopie; Colin M MacLeod
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-04

3.  The process-dissociation approach two decades later: convergence, boundary conditions, and new directions.

Authors:  Andrew P Yonelinas; Larry L Jacoby
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-07

4.  Using ecphoric confidence ratings to discriminate seen from unseen faces: the effects of retention interval and distinctiveness.

Authors:  James D Sauer; Nathan Weber; Neil Brewer
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-06

5.  Recollection and familiarity make independent contributions to memory judgments.

Authors:  Lisa H Evans; Edward L Wilding
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Fuzzy-Trace Theory and Lifespan Cognitive Development.

Authors:  C J Brainerd; Valerie F Reyna
Journal:  Dev Rev       Date:  2015-12-01

7.  Retrieval Expectations Affect False Recollection: Insights from a Criterial Recollection Task.

Authors:  David A Gallo
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-08-01

8.  Memory strength and specificity revealed by pupillometry.

Authors:  Megan H Papesh; Stephen D Goldinger; Michael C Hout
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 2.997

9.  Age differences in the neural correlates of the specificity of recollection: An event-related potential study.

Authors:  Erin D Horne; Joshua D Koen; Nedra Hauck; Michael D Rugg
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Metacognitive awareness and adaptive recognition biases.

Authors:  Diana Selmeczy; Ian G Dobbins
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 3.051

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.