Literature DB >> 12217968

Brain activity underlying encoding and retrieval of source memory.

Selene Cansino1, Pierre Maquet, Raymond J Dolan, Michael D Rugg.   

Abstract

Neural activity elicited during the encoding and retrieval of source information was investigated with event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (efMRI). During encoding, 17 subjects performed a natural/artificial judgement on pictures of common objects which were presented randomly in one of the four quadrants of the display. At retrieval, old pictures were mixed with new ones and subjects judged whether each picture was new or old and, if old, indicated in which quadrant it was presented at encoding. During encoding, study items that were later recognized and assigned a correct source judgement elicited greater activity than recognized items given incorrect judgements in a variety of regions, including right lateral occipital and left prefrontal cortex. At retrieval, regions showing greater activity for recognized items given correct versus incorrect source judgements included the right hippocampal formation and the left prefrontal cortex. These findings indicate a role for these regions in the encoding and retrieval of episodic information beyond that required for simple item recognition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12217968     DOI: 10.1093/cercor/12.10.1048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  129 in total

1.  Reaction time, memory strength, and fMRI activity during memory retrieval: Hippocampus and default network are differentially responsive during recollection and familiarity judgments.

Authors:  Sarah I Gimbel; James B Brewer
Journal:  Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.065

2.  Multiple routes to memory: distinct medial temporal lobe processes build item and source memories.

Authors:  Lila Davachi; Jason P Mitchell; Anthony D Wagner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-02-10       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Age-related differences in prefrontal cortex activity during retrieval monitoring: testing the compensation and dysfunction accounts.

Authors:  Ian M McDonough; Jessica T Wong; David A Gallo
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Theta power during encoding predicts subsequent-memory performance and default mode network deactivation.

Authors:  Thomas P White; Marije Jansen; Kathrin Doege; Karen J Mullinger; S Bert Park; Elizabeth B Liddle; Penny A Gowland; Susan T Francis; Richard Bowtell; Peter F Liddle
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Cognitive training-related changes in hippocampal activity associated with recollection in older adults.

Authors:  Brenda A Kirchhoff; Benjamin A Anderson; Staci E Smith; Deanna M Barch; Larry L Jacoby
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  The multiple neural networks of familiarity: A meta-analysis of functional imaging studies.

Authors:  Mathilde Horn; Renaud Jardri; Fabien D'Hondt; Guillaume Vaiva; Pierre Thomas; Delphine Pins
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  Overlap between the neural correlates of cued recall and source memory: evidence for a generic recollection network?

Authors:  Hiroki R Hayama; Kaia L Vilberg; Michael D Rugg
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Trusting our memories: dissociating the neural correlates of confidence in veridical versus illusory memories.

Authors:  Hongkeun Kim; Roberto Cabeza
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Orbitofrontal and hippocampal contributions to memory for face-name associations: the rewarding power of a smile.

Authors:  Takashi Tsukiura; Roberto Cabeza
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2008-03-30       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  An investigation of the effects of relative probability of old and new test items on the neural correlates of successful and unsuccessful source memory.

Authors:  Kaia L Vilberg; Michael D Rugg
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-12-25       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.