Literature DB >> 22049294

Both longer oral sensory exposure to and higher intensity of saltiness decrease ad libitum food intake in healthy normal-weight men.

Dieuwerke P Bolhuis1, Catriona M M Lakemond, Rene A de Wijk, Pieternel A Luning, Cees de Graaf.   

Abstract

Orosensory exposure to sweetness has been shown to be important in satiation, whereas the effect of exposure to a salty taste on satiation is not known. The primary objective was to investigate the effect of orosensory exposure time to and intensity of saltiness in soup on ad libitum intake. The secondary objective was to investigate the effect of intensity on bite size. Fifty-five healthy men consumed ad libitum from both a low-salt (LS) and a high-salt (HS) creamy tomato soup in 2 exposure time conditions ("long" and "short") and a free condition ("free"). Bites were administered and controlled via a pump. In the long condition, bites of 5 g were administered in 2 s at intervals of 5 s (exposure time: 24 s/min). In the short condition, bites of 15 g were administered in 3 s at intervals of 15 s (exposure time: 12 s/min). The eating rate was equal in the long and short conditions (60 g/min). In the free condition, participants adjusted their bite sizes at intervals of 15 s. The short condition resulted in ~34% higher ad libitum intake compared to the long condition (P < 0.001); there was no interaction with intensity. Ad libitum intake of HS soup was ~9% lower than LS soup (P < 0.001). The free condition showed that HS soup was consumed with smaller bite sizes during the first half of the intake period (P < 0.05). Longer orosensory exposure and higher saltiness intensity both decreased food intake, although orosensory exposure had more impact than intensity. Prolonging the orosensory exposure per food unit may be helpful to reduce food intake.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22049294     DOI: 10.3945/jn.111.143867

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nutr        ISSN: 0022-3166            Impact factor:   4.798


  21 in total

1.  A sipometer for measuring motivation to consume and reward value of foods and beverages in humans: Description and proof of principle.

Authors:  P S Hogenkamp; A Shechter; M-P St-Onge; A Sclafani; H R Kissileff
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2017-01-13

2.  Satiety and energy intake after single and repeated exposure to gel-forming dietary fiber: post-ingestive effects.

Authors:  A J Wanders; M Mars; K J Borgonjen-van den Berg; C de Graaf; E J M Feskens
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 5.095

3.  Effects of learning and food form on energy intake and appetitive responses.

Authors:  Joshua B Jones; Richard D Mattes
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2014-06-21

4.  The Satiation Framework: Exploring processes that contribute to satiation.

Authors:  Paige M Cunningham; Barbara J Rolls
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2021-04-07

5.  The Effects of a Normal Rate versus a Slow Intervalled Rate of Oral Nutrient Intake and Intravenous Low Rate Macronutrient Application on Psychophysical Function - Two Pilot Studies.

Authors:  Melanie Y Denzer-Lippmann; Stephan Bachlechner; Jan Wielopolski; Marie Fischer; Andrea Buettner; Arndt Doerfler; Christof Schöfl; Gerald Münch; Johannes Kornhuber; Norbert Thürauf
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-06-28

6.  Effects of aroma and taste, independently or in combination, on appetite sensation and subsequent food intake.

Authors:  Wenting Yin; Louise Hewson; Robert Linforth; Moira Taylor; Ian D Fisk
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 3.868

7.  The impact of food viscosity on eating rate, subjective appetite, glycemic response and gastric emptying rate.

Authors:  Yong Zhu; Walter H Hsu; James H Hollis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Consumption with large sip sizes increases food intake and leads to underestimation of the amount consumed.

Authors:  Dieuwerke P Bolhuis; Catriona M M Lakemond; Rene A de Wijk; Pieternel A Luning; Cees de Graaf
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Slow food: sustained impact of harder foods on the reduction in energy intake over the course of the day.

Authors:  Dieuwerke P Bolhuis; Ciarán G Forde; Yuejiao Cheng; Haohuan Xu; Nathalie Martin; Cees de Graaf
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The Availability of Slow and Fast Calories in the Dutch Diet: The Current Situation and Opportunities for Interventions.

Authors:  Janet van den Boer; Melanie Werts; Els Siebelink; Cees de Graaf; Monica Mars
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2017-10-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.