Literature DB >> 33838204

The Satiation Framework: Exploring processes that contribute to satiation.

Paige M Cunningham1, Barbara J Rolls2.   

Abstract

Satiation has been described as a process that leads to the termination of eating and controls meal size. However, studies have shown that the termination of eating can be influenced by multiple behavioral and biological processes over the course of a meal as well as those related to the context in which the meal is consumed. To expand understanding of how individuals experience satiation during a meal, we recently developed the Reasons Individuals Stop Eating Questionnaire (RISE-Q). The development of the RISE-Q revealed five distinct factors reported to contribute to meal termination: Planned Amount, Self-Consciousness, Decreased Food Appeal, Physical Satisfaction, and Decreased Priority of Eating. Thus, we define satiation as a series of dynamic processes that emerge over the course of a meal to promote meal termination. We suggest that each of the factors identified by the RISE-Q represents a distinct process, and illustrate the contribution of each process to meal termination in the Satiation Framework. Within this framework the prominence of each process as a reason to stop eating likely depends on meal context in addition to individual variability. Therefore, we discuss contexts in which different processes may be salient as determinants of meal termination. Expanding the definition of satiation to include several dynamic processes as illustrated in the Satiation Framework will help to stimulate investigation and understanding of the complex nature of meal termination.
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Energy intake; Meal Size; Meal termination; RISE-Q; Satiation

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33838204      PMCID: PMC8113148          DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2021.113419

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  75 in total

Review 1.  Gastric satiation is volumetric, intestinal satiation is nutritive.

Authors:  Terry L Powley; Robert J Phillips
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2004-08

2.  Is the effect of a social model on eating attenuated by hunger?

Authors:  S J Goldman; C P Herman; J Polivy
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 3.868

3.  Variety enhances food intake in humans: role of sensory-specific satiety.

Authors:  L Brondel; M Romer; V Van Wymelbeke; N Pineau; T Jiang; C Hanus; D Rigaud
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2009-02-01

4.  Food reward. What it is and how to measure it.

Authors:  Peter J Rogers; Charlotte A Hardman
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 3.868

5.  Effect of meal volume and energy density on the gastric emptying of carbohydrates.

Authors:  J N Hunt; J L Smith; C L Jiang
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Modeling influences on the eating behavior of successful and unsuccessful dieters and untreated normal weight individuals.

Authors:  B Rosenthal; R D Marx
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 3.913

7.  The three-factor eating questionnaire to measure dietary restraint, disinhibition and hunger.

Authors:  A J Stunkard; S Messick
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 3.006

8.  Satiety and test meal intake among women with binge eating disorder.

Authors:  Robyn Sysko; Michael J Devlin; B Timothy Walsh; Ellen Zimmerli; Harry R Kissileff
Journal:  Int J Eat Disord       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.861

9.  Breaking Bread: the Functions of Social Eating.

Authors:  R I M Dunbar
Journal:  Adapt Human Behav Physiol       Date:  2017-03-11

Review 10.  Mind over platter: pre-meal planning and the control of meal size in humans.

Authors:  J M Brunstrom
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 5.095

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.