Literature DB >> 22049237

Responses to Information about Psychosocial Consequences of Genetic Testing for Breast Cancer Susceptibility: Influences of Cancer Worry and Risk Perceptions.

L D Cameron1, M A Diefenbach.   

Abstract

We assessed the impact of information about psychosocial consequences of genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility on interest in and beliefs about genetic testing, and whether these effects vary by levels of either cancer worry or perceived cancer risk. Women (N = 180) in an experimental study were randomly assigned to read one of four messages consisting of standard information along with information about either psychosocial advantages, potential disadvantages, both advantages and disadvantages, or no additional information. Women receiving only standard information reported higher interest in obtaining genetic testing than did women who received additional information about advantages, disadvantages, or both advantages and disadvantages. Cancer worry (but not perceived risk) predicted greater interest and more favorable beliefs about the benefits of testing. Beliefs that testing causes emotional distress were positively associated with worry and negatively associated with risk perceptions.

Entities:  

Year:  2001        PMID: 22049237     DOI: 10.1177/135910530100600104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Psychol        ISSN: 1359-1053


  26 in total

1.  Illness perceptions, risk perception and worry in SDH mutation carriers.

Authors:  L T van Hulsteijn; A A Kaptein; A Louisse; N R Biermasz; J W A Smit; E P M Corssmit
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.375

2.  To test or not to test? Moderators of the relationship between risk perceptions and interest in predictive genetic testing.

Authors:  Shoshana Shiloh; Shiri Ilan
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2005-09-30

Review 3.  Ethical issues of predictive genetic testing for diabetes.

Authors:  Susanne B Haga
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-07-01

4.  Cognitive and Affective Perceptions of Vulnerability as Predictors of Exercise Intentions among People with Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  David B Portnoy; Annette R Kaufman; William M P Klein; Todd A Doyle; Mary de Groot
Journal:  J Risk Res       Date:  2014-01-01

5.  Considerations for the impact of personal genome information: a study of genomic profiling among genetics and genomics professionals.

Authors:  Julianne M O'Daniel; Susanne B Haga; Huntington F Willard
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Factors Associated with Interest in Gene-Panel Testing and Risk Communication Preferences in Women from BRCA1/2 Negative Families.

Authors:  Kristina G Flores; Laurie E Steffen; Christopher J McLouth; Belinda E Vicuña; Amanda Gammon; Wendy Kohlmann; Lucretia Vigil; Zoneddy R Dayao; Melanie E Royce; Anita Y Kinney
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-08-06       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 7.  Predictors of genetic testing decisions: a systematic review and critique of the literature.

Authors:  Kate Sweeny; Arezou Ghane; Angela M Legg; Ho Phi Huynh; Sara E Andrews
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Modelling decisions to undergo genetic testing for susceptibility to common health conditions: an ancillary study of the Multiplex Initiative.

Authors:  Christopher H Wade; Shoshana Shiloh; Samuel W Woolford; J Scott Roberts; Sharon Hensley Alford; Theresa M Marteau; Barbara B Biesecker
Journal:  Psychol Health       Date:  2011-06-09

9.  Breast cancer anxiety's associations with responses to a chemoprevention decision aid.

Authors:  Amanda J Dillard; Laura Scherer; Peter A Ubel; Dylan M Smith; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Jennifer B McClure; Sarah Greene; Azadeh Stark; Angela Fagerlin
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Predictive value of breast cancer cognitions and attitudes toward genetic testing on women's interest in genetic testing for breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Frauke Reitz; Jürgen Barth; Jürgen Bengel
Journal:  Psychosoc Med       Date:  2004-07-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.