Literature DB >> 22047785

Defining functional shoulder range of motion for activities of daily living.

Surena Namdari1, Gautam Yagnik, D David Ebaugh, Sameer Nagda, Matthew L Ramsey, Gerald R Williams, Samir Mehta.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The range of motion (ROM) in the wrist and elbow required for daily activities has been reported to be less than the normal anatomic ROM. This functional ROM has not been defined for the shoulder. Many shoulder outcome assessment tools use specific functional tasks of daily living to score functional results of treatment. This study quantified the total shoulder ROM required to perform the functional tasks of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon (ASES), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), and University of Pennsylvania (U-Penn) Shoulder Score (PSS).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The FASTRAK electromagnetic tracking system (Colchester, VT, USA) was used to test 40 shoulders in 20 volunteers with no shoulder pathology found on physical examination. Three sensors were used: 1 each on the T3 spinous process, the scapular spine, and the arm over the distal humerus. Subjects performed each functional task of the ASES, SST, and PSS while flexion, extension, abduction, adduction, external rotation, and internal rotation were recorded.
RESULTS: Average shoulder motions required to perform the 10 functional tasks were flexion, 121° ± 6.7°; extension, 46° ± 5.3°; abduction, 128° ± 7.9°; cross-body adduction, 116° ± 9.1°; external rotation with the arm 90° abducted, 59° ± 10°; and internal rotation with the arm at the side, 102° ± 7.7°.
CONCLUSION: Although attaining full motion is a reasonable goal of all shoulder treatment, our results indicate that less ROM is required to perform the functional tasks used in common outcome tools.
Copyright © 2012 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22047785     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.07.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  30 in total

1.  Architectural analysis and predicted functional capability of the human latissimus dorsi muscle.

Authors:  Michael E Gerling; Stephen H M Brown
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Midterm outcomes of arthroscopic remplissage for the management of recurrent anterior shoulder instability.

Authors:  Emmanouil Brilakis; Elias Mataragas; Anastasios Deligeorgis; Vasilios Maniatis; Emmanouil Antonogiannakis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Development and Application of a Novel Metric to Characterize Comprehensive Range of Motion of Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Josie A Elwell; George S Athwal; Ryan Willing
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  Early Versus Late Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Proximal Humerus Fractures: Does It Matter?

Authors:  Adam Seidl; Daniel Sholder; William Warrender; Michael Livesey; Gerald Williams; Joseph Abboud; Surena Namdari
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2017-07

5.  Can patients manage toileting after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty? A systematic review.

Authors:  Jorge Rojas; Jacob Joseph; Bingli Liu; Uma Srikumaran; Edward G McFarland
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Is limited shoulder abduction associated with poor scapulothoracic mobility after reverse shoulder arthroplasty?

Authors:  Bernd Friesenbichler; Andrea Grassi; Cécile Grobet; Laurent Audigé; Barbara Wirth
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 3.067

7.  Operative repair of proximal humerus fractures in septuagenarians and octogenarians: Does chronologic age matter?

Authors:  Abraham Michael Goch; Anthony Christiano; Sanjit Reddy Konda; Philipp Leucht; Kenneth Andrew Egol
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2017-01-23

8.  The effect of glenosphere size on functional outcome for reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  V J Sabesan; D J Lombardo; R Shahriar; G R Petersen-Fitts; J M Wiater
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2016-02-09

9.  Patient satisfaction and outcomes of static progressive stretch bracing: a 10-year prospective analysis.

Authors:  Nipun Sodhi; Benjamin Yao; Hiba K Anis; Anton Khlopas; Assem A Sultan; Jared M Newman; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-02

10.  Clinical outcomes and ultrasonographic viability of GraftJacket® augmented rotator cuff repair: a prospective follow-up study with mean follow-up of forty-one months.

Authors:  Simon M Johnson; Jennifer V Cherry; Naveena Thomas; Mansoor Jafri; Arpit Jariwala; Gordon G McLeod
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-09-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.