Literature DB >> 24488221

Midterm outcomes of arthroscopic remplissage for the management of recurrent anterior shoulder instability.

Emmanouil Brilakis1, Elias Mataragas2, Anastasios Deligeorgis3, Vasilios Maniatis4, Emmanouil Antonogiannakis5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to present midterm results concerning the management of recurrent anterior shoulder instability with the remplissage technique in addition to the classic Bankart repair, in patients with engaging Hill-Sachs lesions.
METHODS: During a time period of 4 years (January 2007-December 2010), 48 patients with an average age of 28.9 ± 7.8 years were operated on in our department. They all had a positive apprehension sign pre-operatively and satisfied the inclusion criteria of this study. Seventy-nine per cent of these patients were involved in sport activities of different levels. The mean follow-up period was 37.2 ± 9.9 months.
RESULTS: Three patients (6.3 %) had suffered a new dislocation: one of them after a low-energy trauma and the two other after a high-energy trauma. The rest of the patients (93.7 %) were satisfied with the surgical result and returned to their previous everyday activities while 70.8 % continued to participate in sporting activities without restrictions. The ASES score increased from 67.7 ± 21.5 points pre-operatively to 90.8 ± 21.7 points post-operatively (p < 0.01), the modified Rowe score from 38 ± 17.3 to 93.8 ± 14.5 (p < 0.001) and the Oxford Instability score from 27.6 ± 11.1 to 45.1 ± 8.3 (p < 0.001). No significant restriction in shoulder range of motion was documented.
CONCLUSIONS: The outcome of the enhancement of the classic Bankart repair with tenodesis of the infraspinatus and posterior capsular plication is very good as far as the management of recurrent anterior shoulder instability is concerned, without significantly influencing the range of motion of the shoulder. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study-case series with no comparison group, Level IV.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthroscopy; Engaging Hill–Sachs lesion; Recurrent anterior shoulder instability; Remplissage; Shoulder

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24488221     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-2848-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  30 in total

1.  Traumatic glenohumeral bone defects and their relationship to failure of arthroscopic Bankart repairs: significance of the inverted-pear glenoid and the humeral engaging Hill-Sachs lesion.

Authors:  S S Burkhart; J F De Beer
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.772

2.  Articular arc length mismatch as a cause of failed bankart repair.

Authors:  S S Burkhart; S M Danaceau
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  Arthroscopic anterior stabilization of the shoulder: two to six-year follow-up.

Authors:  Seung-Ho Kim; Kwon-Ick Ha; Yang-Bum Cho; Byung-Dam Ryu; Irvin Oh
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 4.  Axillary shoulder with exaggerated rotation: the Hill-Sachs defect.

Authors:  J A Rafert; B W Long; E M Hernandez; D L Kreipke
Journal:  Radiol Technol       Date:  1990 Sep-Oct

5.  Quantifying glenoid bone loss arthroscopically in shoulder instability.

Authors:  Stephen S Burkhart; Joe F Debeer; Armin M Tehrany; Peter M Parten
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.772

6.  Prospective evaluation of arthroscopic bankart repairs for anterior instability.

Authors:  James E Voos; Ryan W Livermore; Brian T Feeley; David W Altchek; Riley J Williams; Russell F Warren; Frank A Cordasco; Answorth A Allen
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Arthroscopic stabilization in patients with an inverted pear glenoid: results in patients with bone loss of the anterior glenoid.

Authors:  Timothy S Mologne; Matthew T Provencher; Kyle A Menzel; Tyler A Vachon; Christopher B Dewing
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  The incidence of Hill-Sachs lesions in initial anterior shoulder dislocations.

Authors:  J J Calandra; C L Baker; J Uribe
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.772

9.  Decreased range of motion following arthroscopic remplissage.

Authors:  Allen A Deutsch; Derek G Kroll
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.390

10.  Hill-Sachs lesion and normal humeral groove: MR imaging features allowing their differentiation.

Authors:  R D Richards; D J Sartoris; M N Pathria; D Resnick
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  11 in total

1.  Anterior shoulder instability with engaging Hill-Sachs defects: a comparison of arthroscopic Bankart repair with and without posterior capsulodesis.

Authors:  Nam Su Cho; Jae Hyun Yoo; Hyung Suk Juh; Yong Girl Rhee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Complications after arthroscopic labral repair for shoulder instability.

Authors:  Keisuke Matsuki; Hiroyuki Sugaya
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2015-03

3.  Results of arthroscopic Bankart repair with Hill-Sachs remplissage for anterior shoulder instability.

Authors:  Nicolas Bonnevialle; Vadim Azoulay; Amélie Faraud; Fanny Elia; Pascal Swider; Pierre Mansat
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Long-term outcome of arthroscopic remplissage in addition to the classic Bankart repair for the management of recurrent anterior shoulder instability with engaging Hill-Sachs lesions.

Authors:  Emmanouil Brilakis; Grigoris Avramidis; Michael-Alexander Malahias; Apostolos Stathellis; Anastasios Deligeorgis; Ioannis Chiotis; Elias Mataragas; Efstathios Chronopoulos; Emmanouil Antonogiannakis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  [Research progress of surgical treatment for anterior shoulder dislocation and combined injuries].

Authors:  Daqiang Liang; Zhihe Qiu; Haifeng Liu; Wei Lu
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2019-06-15

6.  Patient Outcomes and Fear of Returning to Sports After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair With Remplissage.

Authors:  Sijia Feng; Mo Chen; Jun Chen; Hong Li; Jiwu Chen; Shiyi Chen
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-04-29

7.  Arthroscopic Remplissage Using a Double-Pulley System for Hill-Sachs Lesions for Recurrent Shoulder Instability.

Authors:  Brittany M Woodall; Nicholas Elena; Danoush Paborji; Edward C Shin; Neil Pathare; Patrick J McGahan; James L Chen
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2018-06-25

8.  Combined Double-Pulley Remplissage and Bankart Repair.

Authors:  Dong Hyeon Kim; Joo Yeon Kim; Juho Park; Mika Talwar; Sarah Jenkins; Brandon Gardner; Patrick McGahan; James L Chen
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2022-02-18

9.  Arthroscopic Bankart and Remplissage for Anteroinferior Instability With Subcritical Bone Loss Has a Low Recurrence Rate.

Authors:  Shirish Pathak; Murtaza J Haidermota; Vimal Kumar K H; Parag Sancheti
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2022-02-01

10.  Bony Versus Soft Tissue Reconstruction for Anterior Shoulder Instability: An Expected Value Decision Analysis.

Authors:  Richard James McLaughlin; Anthony Miniaci; Morgan H Jones
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2015-12-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.