Literature DB >> 22045506

SPINE X: improving protein secondary structure prediction by multistep learning coupled with prediction of solvent accessible surface area and backbone torsion angles.

Eshel Faraggi1, Tuo Zhang, Yuedong Yang, Lukasz Kurgan, Yaoqi Zhou.   

Abstract

Accurate prediction of protein secondary structure is essential for accurate sequence alignment, three-dimensional structure modeling, and function prediction. The accuracy of ab initio secondary structure prediction from sequence, however, has only increased from around 77 to 80% over the past decade. Here, we developed a multistep neural-network algorithm by coupling secondary structure prediction with prediction of solvent accessibility and backbone torsion angles in an iterative manner. Our method called SPINE X was applied to a dataset of 2640 proteins (25% sequence identity cutoff) previously built for the first version of SPINE and achieved a 82.0% accuracy based on 10-fold cross validation (Q(3)). Surpassing 81% accuracy by SPINE X is further confirmed by employing an independently built test dataset of 1833 protein chains, a recently built dataset of 1975 proteins and 117 CASP 9 targets (critical assessment of structure prediction techniques) with an accuracy of 81.3%, 82.3% and 81.8%, respectively. The prediction accuracy is further improved to 83.8% for the dataset of 2640 proteins if the DSSP assignment used above is replaced by a more consistent consensus secondary structure assignment method. Comparison to the popular PSIPRED and CASP-winning structure-prediction techniques is made. SPINE X predicts number of helices and sheets correctly for 21.0% of 1833 proteins, compared to 17.6% by PSIPRED. It further shows that SPINE X consistently makes more accurate prediction in helical residues (6%) without over prediction while PSIPRED makes more accurate prediction in coil residues (3-5%) and over predicts them by 7%. SPINE X Server and its training/test datasets are available at http://sparks.informatics.iupui.edu/
Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22045506      PMCID: PMC3240697          DOI: 10.1002/jcc.21968

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Chem        ISSN: 0192-8651            Impact factor:   3.376


  40 in total

1.  Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices.

Authors:  D T Jones
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-09-17       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Combining evolutionary and structural information for local protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Jimin Pei; Nick V Grishin
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2004-09-01

4.  Porter: a new, accurate server for protein secondary structure prediction.

Authors:  Gianluca Pollastri; Aoife McLysaght
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-12-07       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Protein secondary structure prediction with dihedral angles.

Authors:  Matthew J Wood; Jonathan D Hirst
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2005-05-15

6.  The effect of long-range interactions on the secondary structure formation of proteins.

Authors:  Daisuke Kihara
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2005-06-29       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  Assessing secondary structure assignment of protein structures by using pairwise sequence-alignment benchmarks.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; A Keith Dunker; Yaoqi Zhou
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2008-04

8.  Real-SPINE: an integrated system of neural networks for real-value prediction of protein structural properties.

Authors:  Ofer Dor; Yaoqi Zhou
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2007-07-01

Review 9.  Protein secondary structure prediction.

Authors:  Walter Pirovano; Jaap Heringa
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2010

10.  Critical assessment of high-throughput standalone methods for secondary structure prediction.

Authors:  Hua Zhang; Tuo Zhang; Ke Chen; Kanaka Durga Kedarisetti; Marcin J Mizianty; Qingbo Bao; Wojciech Stach; Lukasz Kurgan
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 11.622

View more
  86 in total

1.  Comparing NMR and X-ray protein structure: Lindemann-like parameters and NMR disorder.

Authors:  Eshel Faraggi; A Keith Dunker; Joel L Sussman; Andrzej Kloczkowski
Journal:  J Biomol Struct Dyn       Date:  2017-08-08

2.  The role of semidisorder in temperature adaptation of bacterial FlgM proteins.

Authors:  Jihua Wang; Yuedong Yang; Zanxia Cao; Zhixiu Li; Huiying Zhao; Yaoqi Zhou
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Improving protein fold recognition and template-based modeling by employing probabilistic-based matching between predicted one-dimensional structural properties of query and corresponding native properties of templates.

Authors:  Yuedong Yang; Eshel Faraggi; Huiying Zhao; Yaoqi Zhou
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-06-11       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Testing whether metazoan tyrosine loss was driven by selection against promiscuous phosphorylation.

Authors:  Siddharth Pandya; Travis J Struck; Brian K Mannakee; Mary Paniscus; Ryan N Gutenkunst
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 5.  Critical evaluation of bioinformatics tools for the prediction of protein crystallization propensity.

Authors:  Huilin Wang; Liubin Feng; Geoffrey I Webb; Lukasz Kurgan; Jiangning Song; Donghai Lin
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 11.622

6.  CONFOLD: Residue-residue contact-guided ab initio protein folding.

Authors:  Badri Adhikari; Debswapna Bhattacharya; Renzhi Cao; Jianlin Cheng
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2015-06-06

7.  A Deep Learning Network Approach to ab initio Protein Secondary Structure Prediction.

Authors:  Matt Spencer; Jesse Eickholt
Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 8.  Energy functions in de novo protein design: current challenges and future prospects.

Authors:  Zhixiu Li; Yuedong Yang; Jian Zhan; Liang Dai; Yaoqi Zhou
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 12.981

9.  Predicting the molecular interactions of CRIP1a-cannabinoid 1 receptor with integrated molecular modeling approaches.

Authors:  Mostafa H Ahmed; Glen E Kellogg; Dana E Selley; Martin K Safo; Yan Zhang
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 2.823

10.  SPOT-Seq-RNA: predicting protein-RNA complex structure and RNA-binding function by fold recognition and binding affinity prediction.

Authors:  Yuedong Yang; Huiying Zhao; Jihua Wang; Yaoqi Zhou
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2014
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.