Literature DB >> 25312910

Testing whether metazoan tyrosine loss was driven by selection against promiscuous phosphorylation.

Siddharth Pandya1, Travis J Struck1, Brian K Mannakee2, Mary Paniscus3, Ryan N Gutenkunst4.   

Abstract

Protein tyrosine phosphorylation is a key regulatory modification in metazoans, and the corresponding kinase enzymes have diversified dramatically. This diversification is correlated with a genome-wide reduction in protein tyrosine content, and it was recently suggested that this reduction was driven by selection to avoid promiscuous phosphorylation that might be deleterious. We tested three predictions of this intriguing hypothesis. 1) Selection should be stronger on residues that are more likely to be phosphorylated due to local solvent accessibility or structural disorder. 2) Selection should be stronger on proteins that are more likely to be promiscuously phosphorylated because they are abundant. We tested these predictions by comparing distributions of tyrosine within and among human and yeast orthologous proteins. 3) Selection should be stronger against mutations that create tyrosine versus remove tyrosine. We tested this prediction using human population genomic variation data. We found that all three predicted effects are modest for tyrosine when compared with the other amino acids, suggesting that selection against deleterious phosphorylation was not dominant in driving metazoan tyrosine loss.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  allele frequency; expression level; phosphorylation; promiscuous; solvent accessibility; structural disorder; tyrosine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25312910      PMCID: PMC4271526          DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msu284

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  62 in total

1.  Roles of “junk phosphorylation” in modulating biomolecular association of phosphorylated proteins?

Authors:  Chris Soon Heng Tan; Claus Jørgensen; Rune Linding
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 4.534

2.  The frailty of adaptive hypotheses for the origins of organismal complexity.

Authors:  Michael Lynch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Tuning bulk electrostatics to regulate protein function.

Authors:  Zach Serber; James E Ferrell
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2007-02-09       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Structural determinants of protein evolution are context-sensitive at the residue level.

Authors:  Eric A Franzosa; Yu Xia
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2009-07-13       Impact factor: 16.240

5.  Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism.

Authors:  F Tajima
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  The codon Adaptation Index--a measure of directional synonymous codon usage bias, and its potential applications.

Authors:  P M Sharp; W H Li
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1987-02-11       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Genomic survey of premetazoans shows deep conservation of cytoplasmic tyrosine kinases and multiple radiations of receptor tyrosine kinases.

Authors:  Hiroshi Suga; Michael Dacre; Alex de Mendoza; Kamran Shalchian-Tabrizi; Gerard Manning; Iñaki Ruiz-Trillo
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 8.192

8.  Linear motif atlas for phosphorylation-dependent signaling.

Authors:  Martin Lee Miller; Lars Juhl Jensen; Francesca Diella; Claus Jørgensen; Michele Tinti; Lei Li; Marilyn Hsiung; Sirlester A Parker; Jennifer Bordeaux; Thomas Sicheritz-Ponten; Marina Olhovsky; Adrian Pasculescu; Jes Alexander; Stefan Knapp; Nikolaj Blom; Peer Bork; Shawn Li; Gianni Cesareni; Tony Pawson; Benjamin E Turk; Michael B Yaffe; Søren Brunak; Rune Linding
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 8.192

9.  An integrated map of genetic variation from 1,092 human genomes.

Authors:  Goncalo R Abecasis; Adam Auton; Lisa D Brooks; Mark A DePristo; Richard M Durbin; Robert E Handsaker; Hyun Min Kang; Gabor T Marth; Gil A McVean
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Assessing the evolutionary impact of amino acid mutations in the human genome.

Authors:  Adam R Boyko; Scott H Williamson; Amit R Indap; Jeremiah D Degenhardt; Ryan D Hernandez; Kirk E Lohmueller; Mark D Adams; Steffen Schmidt; John J Sninsky; Shamil R Sunyaev; Thomas J White; Rasmus Nielsen; Andrew G Clark; Carlos D Bustamante
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  4 in total

1.  Defining Human Tyrosine Kinase Phosphorylation Networks Using Yeast as an In Vivo Model Substrate.

Authors:  Thomas Corwin; Jonathan Woodsmith; Federico Apelt; Jean-Fred Fontaine; David Meierhofer; Johannes Helmuth; Arndt Grossmann; Miguel A Andrade-Navarro; Bryan A Ballif; Ulrich Stelzl
Journal:  Cell Syst       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 10.304

2.  Universal and taxon-specific trends in protein sequences as a function of age.

Authors:  Jennifer E James; Sara M Willis; Paul G Nelson; Catherine Weibel; Luke J Kosinski; Joanna Masel
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  Characterizing selective pressures on the pathway for de novo biosynthesis of pyrimidines in yeast.

Authors:  Russell A Hermansen; Brian K Mannakee; Wolfgang Knecht; David A Liberles; Ryan N Gutenkunst
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 3.260

4.  Why do eukaryotic proteins contain more intrinsically disordered regions?

Authors:  Walter Basile; Marco Salvatore; Claudio Bassot; Arne Elofsson
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 4.475

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.