Literature DB >> 22045362

Potential pitfalls of crossover and thoughts on iniparib in triple-negative breast cancer.

Tito Fojo, Laleh Amiri-Kordestani, Susan E Bates.   

Abstract

As recruitment for oncology clinical trials has become more difficult, there appears to have been an increase in the number of studies that allow patients in the control arm to "crossover" and receive the experimental therapy after disease progression. Although some researchers worry that allowing such crossover may abolish gains in progression-free survival in the experimental arm, the possibility that crossover might inadvertently benefit the experimental arm has not been addressed. In clinical trials in which the experimental agent has little or no intrinsic activity and is used to modulate an active combination, such crossover might negatively affect the overall survival of the control arm. Because resistance to the active combination--manifested as disease progression--has occurred, the likelihood of benefit from adding the experimental drug is reduced. Consequently, patients who were randomly assigned to the control arm continue to receive the now inactive combination after crossover, whereas patients in the experimental arm who discontinue study participation may seek out potentially effective salvage regimens. This difference in subsequent therapies may confer an advantage to the experimental arm that is manifested as gains beyond those achieved in progression-free survival, gains that occur not because the experimental therapy induced a change in tumor biology that persists beyond treatment discontinuation but because the control arm suffers by continuing to receive a therapy on which their tumor is progressing. Such an outcome may explain the recently reported trial results for iniparib in triple-negative breast cancer. Given that allowing patients in the control arm to receive the experimental agent may confound interpretation of overall survival, such crossover should not be used indiscriminately, especially if the experimental agent has little or no intrinsic activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22045362      PMCID: PMC3247787          DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djr386

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  20 in total

1.  High-dose cisplatin in hypertonic saline in refractory ovarian cancer.

Authors:  R F Ozols; Y Ostchega; C E Myers; R C Young
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Phase I and pharmacodynamic study of the oral MEK inhibitor CI-1040 in patients with advanced malignancies.

Authors:  Patricia M Lorusso; Alex A Adjei; Mary Varterasian; Shirish Gadgeel; Joel Reid; David Y Mitchell; Lorelei Hanson; Pamela DeLuca; Laura Bruzek; Jill Piens; Peggy Asbury; Keri Van Becelaere; Roman Herrera; Judith Sebolt-Leopold; Mark B Meyer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-07-11       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  How sociodemographics, presence of oncology specialists, and hospital cancer programs affect accrual to cancer treatment trials.

Authors:  Warren B Sateren; Edward L Trimble; Jeffrey Abrams; Otis Brawley; Nancy Breen; Leslie Ford; Mary McCabe; Richard Kaplan; Malcolm Smith; Richard Ungerleider; Michaele C Christian
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-04-15       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Palliative chemotherapy during the last month of life.

Authors:  U Näppä; O Lindqvist; B H Rasmussen; B Axelsson
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2011-03-14       Impact factor: 32.976

5.  Multicenter phase II study of the oral MEK inhibitor, CI-1040, in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung, breast, colon, and pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  John Rinehart; Alex A Adjei; Patricia M Lorusso; David Waterhouse; J Randolph Hecht; Ronald B Natale; Oday Hamid; Mary Varterasian; Peggy Asbury; Eric P Kaldjian; Stephen Gulyas; David Y Mitchell; Roman Herrera; Judith S Sebolt-Leopold; Mark B Meyer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-10-13       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  High-dose carboplatin in refractory ovarian cancer patients.

Authors:  R F Ozols; Y Ostchega; G Curt; R C Young
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Cancer trial enrollment after state-mandated reimbursement.

Authors:  C P Gross; V Murthy; Y Li; A D Kaluzny; H M Krumholz
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-07-21       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Oncologists' reluctance to accrue patients onto clinical trials: an Illinois Cancer Center study.

Authors:  A B Benson; J P Pregler; J A Bean; A W Rademaker; B Eshler; K Anderson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Dose intensity analysis of chemotherapy regimens in ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  L Levin; W M Hryniuk
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  High dose cisplatin and high dose carboplatin in refractory ovarian cancer.

Authors:  R F Ozols; B C Behrens; Y Ostchega; R C Young
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 12.111

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Appraising iniparib, the PARP inhibitor that never was--what must we learn?

Authors:  Joaquin Mateo; Michael Ong; David S P Tan; Michael A Gonzalez; Johann S de Bono
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 2.  PARP inhibitors and more.

Authors:  Chinmoy K Bose; Nirban Basu
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2015-06-01

3.  A model of postsurgical advanced metastatic breast cancer more accurately replicates the clinical efficacy of antiangiogenic drugs.

Authors:  Eric Guerin; Shan Man; Ping Xu; Robert S Kerbel
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Loss of WAVE3 sensitizes triple-negative breast cancers to chemotherapeutics by inhibiting the STAT-HIF-1α-mediated angiogenesis.

Authors:  Gangarao Davuluri; William P Schiemann; Edward F Plow; Khalid Sossey-Alaoui
Journal:  JAKSTAT       Date:  2015-02-03

Review 5.  Strategies for targeting the DNA damage response for cancer therapeutics.

Authors:  Dan Zhang; Hai-Bo Wang; Kathryn L Brinkman; Su-Xia Han; Bo Xu
Journal:  Chin J Cancer       Date:  2012-06-14

6.  Ultrasound-mediated delivery of siESE complexed with microbubbles attenuates HER2+/- cell line proliferation and tumor growth in rodent models of breast cancer.

Authors:  Kang-Ho Song; Tammy Trudeau; Adwitiya Kar; Mark A Borden; Arthur Gutierrez-Hartmann
Journal:  Nanotheranostics       Date:  2019-05-13

7.  Analyses of repeated failures in cancer therapy for solid tumors: poor tumor-selective drug delivery, low therapeutic efficacy and unsustainable costs.

Authors:  Hiroshi Maeda; Mahin Khatami
Journal:  Clin Transl Med       Date:  2018-03-01

8.  Cancer; an induced disease of twentieth century! Induction of tolerance, increased entropy and 'Dark Energy': loss of biorhythms (Anabolism v. Catabolism).

Authors:  Mahin Khatami
Journal:  Clin Transl Med       Date:  2018-07-02
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.