Literature DB >> 15265967

Cancer trial enrollment after state-mandated reimbursement.

C P Gross1, V Murthy, Y Li, A D Kaluzny, H M Krumholz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recruitment of patients into cancer research studies is exceedingly difficult, particularly for early phase trials. Payer reimbursement policies are a frequently cited barrier. We examined whether state policies that ensure coverage of routine medical care costs for cancer trial participants are associated with an increase in clinical trial enrollment.
METHODS: We used logistic Poisson regressions to analyze enrollment in National Cancer Institute phase II and phase III Clinical Trials Cooperative Group trials and compared changes in trial enrollment rates between 1996 and 2001 of privately insured cancer patients who resided in the four states that enacted coverage policies in 1999 with enrollment rates in states without such policies. All statistical tests were two-sided.
RESULTS: Trial enrollment rates increased in the coverage and noncoverage states by 24.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 22.8% to 27.0%) and 28.8% (95% CI = 27.7% to 29.8%) per year, respectively, from 1996 through 2001. After implementation of the coverage policies in 1999 in four states, there was a 21.7% (95% CI = 3.8% to 42.6%) annual increase in phase II trial enrollment in coverage states, compared with a 15.6% (95% CI = 8.8% to 21.8%) annual decrease in noncoverage states (P<.001). After accounting for secular trend, cancer type, and race in multivariable analyses, the odds ratio (OR) for a phase II trial participant residing in a coverage versus a noncoverage state after 1999 was 1.59 per year (95% CI = 1.22 to 2.07; P =.001). In a multivariable analysis of phase III trial participation, there was a decrease in the odds of residing in a coverage state after 1999 (OR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.84 to 0.98; P =.011).
CONCLUSION: State coverage policies were associated with a statistically significant increase in phase II cancer trial participation and did not increase phase III cancer trial enrollment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15265967     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djh193

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  15 in total

Review 1.  Potential pitfalls of crossover and thoughts on iniparib in triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Tito Fojo; Laleh Amiri-Kordestani; Susan E Bates
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement on medicaid reform.

Authors:  Blase N Polite; Jennifer J Griggs; Beverly Moy; Christopher Lathan; Nefertiti C duPont; Gina Villani; Sandra L Wong; Michael T Halpern
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Clinical trials in the era of personalized oncology.

Authors:  Michael L Maitland; Richard L Schilsky
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 508.702

4.  The impact of health insurance mandates on drug innovation: evidence from the United States.

Authors:  Natalie Chun; Minjung Park
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2013-04

Review 5.  Ensuring quality cancer care: a follow-up review of the Institute of Medicine's 10 recommendations for improving the quality of cancer care in America.

Authors:  Tracy Spinks; Heidi W Albright; Thomas W Feeley; Ron Walters; Thomas W Burke; Thomas Aloia; Eduardo Bruera; Aman Buzdar; Lewis Foxhall; David Hui; Barbara Summers; Alma Rodriguez; Raymond Dubois; Kenneth I Shine
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Effect of state-mandated insurance coverage on accrual to community cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Shellie D Ellis; William R Carpenter; Lori M Minasian; Bryan J Weiner
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 2.226

7.  Oncology clinical trials and insurance coverage: An update in a tenuous insurance landscape.

Authors:  Samilia Obeng-Gyasi; Sheetal M Kircher; Kelsey P Lipking; Benjamin J Keele; Al B Benson; Lynne I Wagner; Ruth C Carlos
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 8.  A descriptive analysis of state legislation and policy addressing clinical trials participation.

Authors:  Claudia R Baquet; Shiraz I Mishra; Armin D Weinberg
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2009-05

Review 9.  Designing therapeutic clinical trials for older and frail adults with cancer: U13 conference recommendations.

Authors:  Arti Hurria; William Dale; Margaret Mooney; Julia H Rowland; Karla V Ballman; Harvey J Cohen; Hyman B Muss; Richard L Schilsky; Betty Ferrell; Martine Extermann; Kenneth E Schmader; Supriya G Mohile
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Disparities in cancer clinical trials: an analysis of comprehensive cancer control plans.

Authors:  Tisha Moniek Felder; Gabriela D Pena; Bridget F Chapital
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 2.830

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.