Literature DB >> 22043190

Degree of variability in performance on breast cancer quality indicators: findings from the Florida initiative for quality cancer care.

Jhanelle E Gray1, Christine Laronga, Erin M Siegel, Ji-Hyun Lee, William J Fulp, Michelle Fletcher, Fred Schreiber, Richard Brown, Richard Levine, Thomas Cartwright, Guillermo Abesada-Terk, George Kim, Carlos Alemany, Douglas Faig, Philip Sharp, Merry-Jennifer Markham, David Shibata, Mokenge Malafa, Paul B Jacobsen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The Florida Initiative for Quality Cancer Care (FIQCC) comprises 11 Florida practice sites that participate in comprehensive reviews of quality of care specific to patients with cancer. Here, we examined site adherence to performance indicators to assess quality of care for patients with breast cancer (BC).
METHODS: Quality indicators were scripted on the basis of accepted guidelines from the Quality Oncology Practice Initiative, National Comprehensive Cancer Network, American College of Surgeons, and site-specific expert panel consensus. Comprehensive chart reviews, including both medical and surgical oncology quality measures, were conducted for patients with BC first seen in 2006 by a medical oncologist at one of the sites. Statistical comparisons were made by the Pearson χ(2) exact test, using Monte Carlo estimation.
RESULTS: Charts of 622 patients were reviewed. Of the 34 indicators, seven for medical oncology and four for surgical oncology fell below the 85% level of adherence. A statistically significant difference (P < .001) in variation of performance across the sites was found for the following medical and surgical oncology indicators: documentation of menopausal status, family history, informed consent, planned chemotherapy regimen and flow sheet, American Joint Committee on Cancer staging, HER2/neu status, reporting of margin orientation and inking of the margins, histological grade, having a sentinel lymph node biopsy for invasive BC, and obtaining a mammogram within 14 months of definitive surgery.
CONCLUSION: The FIQCC has identified how multiple aspects of BC care can be improved. Findings are being used at the participating institutions to guide quality improvement efforts.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22043190      PMCID: PMC3140448          DOI: 10.1200/JOP.2010.000174

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oncol Pract        ISSN: 1554-7477            Impact factor:   3.840


  12 in total

1.  Developing a system to assess the quality of cancer care: ASCO's national initiative on cancer care quality.

Authors:  Eric C Schneider; Jennifer L Malin; Katherine L Kahn; Ezekiel J Emanuel; Arnold M Epstein
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-08-01       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Improvement in oncology practice performance through voluntary participation in the Quality Oncology Practice Initiative.

Authors:  Joseph O Jacobson; Michael N Neuss; Kristen K McNiff; Pamela Kadlubek; Leroy R Thacker; Frank Song; Peter D Eisenberg; Joseph V Simone
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Results of the National Initiative for Cancer Care Quality: how can we improve the quality of cancer care in the United States?

Authors:  Jennifer L Malin; Eric C Schneider; Arnold M Epstein; John Adams; Ezekiel J Emanuel; Katherine L Kahn
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-01-09       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Comparison of vignettes, standardized patients, and chart abstraction: a prospective validation study of 3 methods for measuring quality.

Authors:  J W Peabody; J Luck; P Glassman; T R Dresselhaus; M Lee
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-04-05       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in node-positive breast cancer: the results of 20 years of follow-up.

Authors:  G Bonadonna; P Valagussa; A Moliterni; M Zambetti; C Brambilla
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-04-06       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  American Society of Clinical Oncology recommendations on fertility preservation in cancer patients.

Authors:  Stephanie J Lee; Leslie R Schover; Ann H Partridge; Pasquale Patrizio; W Hamish Wallace; Karen Hagerty; Lindsay N Beck; Lawrence V Brennan; Kutluk Oktay
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-05-01       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Analysis of dose intensity for adjuvant chemotherapy trials in stage II breast cancer.

Authors:  W Hryniuk; M N Levine
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Using standardised patients to measure physicians' practice: validation study using audio recordings.

Authors:  Jeff Luck; John W Peabody
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-09-28

9.  Cancer statistics, 2009.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Rebecca Siegel; Elizabeth Ward; Yongping Hao; Jiaquan Xu; Michael J Thun
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 508.702

10.  The Florida Initiative for Quality Cancer Care: a regional project to measure and improve cancer care.

Authors:  Mokenge P Malafa; Michelle M Corman; David Shibata; Erin M Siegel; Ji-Hyun Lee; Paul B Jacobsen
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.302

View more
  10 in total

1.  Quality of care in non-small-cell lung cancer: findings from 11 oncology practices in Florida.

Authors:  Tawee Tanvetyanon; Michelle Corman; Ji-Hyun Lee; William J Fulp; Fred Schreiber; Richard H Brown; Richard M Levine; Thomas H Cartwright; Guillermo Abesada-Terk; George P Kim; Carlos Alemany; Douglas Faig; Philip V Sharp; Merry-Jennifer Markham; Gerold Bepler; Erin Siegel; David Shibata; Mokenge Malafa; Paul B Jacobsen
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.840

2.  Improving Care With a Portfolio of Physician-Led Cancer Quality Measures at an Academic Center.

Authors:  Julie Bryar Porter; Eben Lloyd Rosenthal; Marcy Winget; Andrea Segura Smith; Sridhar Belavadi Seshadri; Yohan Vetteth; Eileen F Kiamanesh; Amogh Badwe; Ranjana H Advani; Mark K Buyyounouski; Steven Coutre; Frederick Dirbas; Vasu Divi; Oliver Dorigo; Kristen N Ganjoo; Laura J Johnston; Lawrence David Recht; Joseph B Shrager; Eila C Skinner; Susan M Swetter; Brendan C Visser; Douglas W Blayney
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 3.840

3.  Florida Initiative for Quality Cancer Care: improvements in breast cancer quality indicators during a 3-year interval.

Authors:  Christine Laronga; Jhanelle E Gray; Erin M Siegel; Ji-Hyun Lee; William J Fulp; Michelle Fletcher; Fred Schreiber; Richard Brown; Richard Levine; Thomas Cartwright; Guillermo Abesada-Terk; George Kim; Carlos Alemany; Douglas Faig; Phillip Sharp; Merry-Jennifer Markham; David Shibata; Mokenge Malafa; Paul B Jacobsen
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Evaluating the effect of clinical care pathways on quality of cancer care: analysis of breast, colon and rectal cancer pathways.

Authors:  Han Bao; Fengjuan Yang; Shaofei Su; Xinyu Wang; Meiqi Zhang; Yaming Xiao; Hao Jiang; Jiaying Wang; Meina Liu
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 4.553

5.  Evaluating the quality of colorectal cancer care in the state of Florida: results from the Florida Initiative for Quality Cancer Care.

Authors:  Erin M Siegel; Paul B Jacobsen; Mokenge Malafa; William Fulp; Michelle Fletcher; Ji-Hyun Lee; Jesusa Corazon R Smith; Richard Brown; Richard Levine; Thomas Cartwright; Guillermo Abesada-Terk; George Kim; Carlos Alemany; Douglas Faig; Philip Sharp; Merry-Jennifer Markham; David Shibata
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 3.840

6.  Florida Initiative for Quality Cancer Care: improvements on colorectal cancer quality of care indicators during a 3-year interval.

Authors:  Erin M Siegel; Paul B Jacobsen; Ji-Hyun Lee; Mokenge Malafa; William Fulp; Michelle Fletcher; Jesusa Corazon R Smith; Richard Brown; Richard Levine; Thomas Cartwright; Guillermo Abesada-Terk; George Kim; Carlos Alemany; Douglas Faig; Philip Sharp; Merry-Jennifer Markham; David Shibata
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2013-11-23       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 7.  Benchmarking and audit of breast units improves quality of care.

Authors:  P A van Dam; L Verkinderen; J Hauspy; P Vermeulen; L Dirix; M Huizing; S Altintas; K Papadimitriou; M Peeters; W Tjalma
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2013

8.  The quality of invasive breast cancer care for low reimbursement rate patients: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Shaofei Su; Han Bao; Xinyu Wang; Zhiqiang Wang; Xi Li; Meiqi Zhang; Jiaying Wang; Hao Jiang; Wenji Wang; Siyang Qu; Meina Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  What are the appropriate thresholds for High Quality Performance Indicators for breast surgery in Australia and New Zealand?

Authors:  Shehnarz Salindera; Michelle Ogilvy; Andrew Spillane
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 4.380

10.  Longitudinal cohort study to determine effectiveness of a novel simulated case and feedback system to improve clinical pathway adherence in breast, lung and GI cancers.

Authors:  Timothy Kubal; Doug G Letson; Alberto A Chiappori; Gregory M Springett; Riti Shimkhada; Diana Tamondong Lachica; John W Peabody
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 2.692

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.