Literature DB >> 22043178

Evaluation of DNA Force Fields in Implicit Solvation.

Thomas Gaillard1, David A Case.   

Abstract

DNA structural deformations and dynamics are crucial to its interactions in the cell. Theoretical simulations are essential tools to explore the structure, dynamics, and thermodynamics of biomolecules in a systematic way. Molecular mechanics force fields for DNA have benefited from constant improvements during the last decades. Several studies have evaluated and compared available force fields when the solvent is modeled by explicit molecules. On the other hand, few systematic studies have assessed the quality of duplex DNA models when implicit solvation is employed. The interest of an implicit modeling of the solvent consists in the important gain in the simulation performance and conformational sampling speed. In this study, respective influences of the force field and the implicit solvation model choice on DNA simulation quality are evaluated. To this end, extensive implicit solvent duplex DNA simulations are performed, attempting to reach both conformational and sequence diversity convergence. Structural parameters are extracted from simulations and statistically compared to available experimental and explicit solvation simulation data. Our results quantitatively expose the respective strengths and weaknesses of the different DNA force fields and implicit solvation models studied. This work can lead to the suggestion of improvements to current DNA theoretical models.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22043178      PMCID: PMC3203201          DOI: 10.1021/ct200384r

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput        ISSN: 1549-9618            Impact factor:   6.006


  64 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 2.  Macromolecular electrostatics: continuum models and their growing pains.

Authors:  T Simonson
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 6.809

Review 3.  Molecular dynamics simulation of nucleic acids.

Authors:  T E Cheatham; P A Kollman
Journal:  Annu Rev Phys Chem       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 12.703

4.  Effective Born radii in the generalized Born approximation: the importance of being perfect.

Authors:  Alexey Onufriev; David A Case; Donald Bashford
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 3.376

5.  The anatomy of A-, B-, and Z-DNA.

Authors:  R E Dickerson; H R Drew; B N Conner; R M Wing; A V Fratini; M L Kopka
Journal:  Science       Date:  1982-04-30       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Reversible bending and helix geometry in a B-DNA dodecamer: CGCGAATTBrCGCG.

Authors:  A V Fratini; M L Kopka; H R Drew; R E Dickerson
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1982-12-25       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 7.  Helix geometry, hydration, and G.A mismatch in a B-DNA decamer.

Authors:  G G Privé; U Heinemann; S Chandrasegaran; L S Kan; M L Kopka; R E Dickerson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-10-23       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Generalized born model with a simple smoothing function.

Authors:  Wonpil Im; Michael S Lee; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2003-11-15       Impact factor: 3.376

View more
  13 in total

1.  A novel implicit solvent model for simulating the molecular dynamics of RNA.

Authors:  Yufeng Liu; Esmael Haddadian; Tobin R Sosnick; Karl F Freed; Haipeng Gong
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Molecular modeling of nucleic acid structure: setup and analysis.

Authors:  T E Cheatham; B R Brooks; P A Kollman
Journal:  Curr Protoc Nucleic Acid Chem       Date:  2001-11

3.  Molecular modeling of nucleic acid structure: electrostatics and solvation.

Authors:  T E Cheatham; B R Brooks; P A Kollman
Journal:  Curr Protoc Nucleic Acid Chem       Date:  2001-08

4.  The "sugar" coarse-grained DNA model.

Authors:  N A Kovaleva; I P Koroleva Kikot; M A Mazo; E A Zubova
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 1.810

5.  CHARMM-GUI Implicit Solvent Modeler for Various Generalized Born Models in Different Simulation Programs.

Authors:  Kye Won Wang; Jumin Lee; Han Zhang; Donghyuk Suh; Wonpil Im
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2022-09-18       Impact factor: 3.466

6.  Refinement of Generalized Born Implicit Solvation Parameters for Nucleic Acids and Their Complexes with Proteins.

Authors:  Hai Nguyen; Alberto Pérez; Sherry Bermeo; Carlos Simmerling
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 6.006

7.  Reference simulations of noncanonical nucleic acids with different χ variants of the AMBER force field: quadruplex DNA, quadruplex RNA and Z-DNA.

Authors:  Miroslav Krepl; Marie Zgarbová; Petr Stadlbauer; Michal Otyepka; Pavel Banáš; Jaroslav Koča; Thomas E Cheatham; Petr Jurečka; Jiří Sponer
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 6.006

8.  Structure, Stiffness and Substates of the Dickerson-Drew Dodecamer.

Authors:  Tomáš Dršata; Alberto Pérez; Modesto Orozco; Alexandre V Morozov; Jiřĺ Sponer; Filip Lankaš
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 6.006

9.  Twenty-five years of nucleic acid simulations.

Authors:  Thomas E Cheatham; David A Case
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.505

10.  Structural and energetic analysis of 2-aminobenzimidazole inhibitors in complex with the hepatitis C virus IRES RNA using molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Niel M Henriksen; Hamed S Hayatshahi; Darrell R Davis; Thomas E Cheatham
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 4.956

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.