Literature DB >> 25368175

New pasture plants intensify invasive species risk.

Don A Driscoll1, Jane A Catford2, Jacob N Barney3, Philip E Hulme4, Tara G Martin5, Aníbal Pauchard6, Petr Pyšek7, David M Richardson8, Sophie Riley9, Vernon Visser8.   

Abstract

Agricultural intensification is critical to meet global food demand, but intensification threatens native species and degrades ecosystems. Sustainable intensification (SI) is heralded as a new approach for enabling growth in agriculture while minimizing environmental impacts. However, the SI literature has overlooked a major environmental risk. Using data from eight countries on six continents, we show that few governments regulate conventionally bred pasture taxa to limit threats to natural areas, even though most agribusinesses promote taxa with substantial weed risk. New pasture taxa (including species, subspecies, varieties, cultivars, and plant-endophyte combinations) are bred with characteristics typical of invasive species and environmental weeds. By introducing novel genetic and endophyte variation, pasture taxa are imbued with additional capacity for invasion and environmental impact. New strategies to prevent future problems are urgently needed. We highlight opportunities for researchers, agribusiness, and consumers to reduce environmental risks associated with new pasture taxa. We also emphasize four main approaches that governments could consider as they build new policies to limit weed risks, including (i) national lists of taxa that are prohibited based on environmental risk; (ii) a weed risk assessment for all new taxa; (iii) a program to rapidly detect and control new taxa that invade natural areas; and (iv) the polluter-pays principle, so that if a taxon becomes an environmental weed, industry pays for its management. There is mounting pressure to increase livestock production. With foresight and planning, growth in agriculture can be achieved sustainably provided that the scope of SI expands to encompass environmental weed risks.

Keywords:  agriculture policy; biological invasions; environmental weed; invasive species; sustainable intensification

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25368175      PMCID: PMC4246316          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1409347111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  26 in total

Review 1.  The more the better? The role of polyploidy in facilitating plant invasions.

Authors:  Mariska te Beest; Johannes J Le Roux; David M Richardson; Anne K Brysting; Jan Suda; Magdalena Kubesová; Petr Pysek
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2011-10-31       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Tackling contentious invasive plant species: a case study of buffel grass in Australia.

Authors:  Anthony C Grice; Margaret H Friedel; Nadine A Marshall; Rieks D Van Klinken
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-11-05       Impact factor: 3.266

Review 3.  A predictive framework and review of the ecological impacts of exotic plant invasions on reptiles and amphibians.

Authors:  Leigh J Martin; Brad R Murray
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2011-05

4.  Increased genetic variation and evolutionary potential drive the success of an invasive grass.

Authors:  Sébastien Lavergne; Jane Molofsky
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Agriculture. Sustainable intensification in agriculture: premises and policies.

Authors:  T Garnett; M C Appleby; A Balmford; I J Bateman; T G Benton; P Bloomer; B Burlingame; M Dawkins; L Dolan; D Fraser; M Herrero; I Hoffmann; P Smith; P K Thornton; C Toulmin; S J Vermeulen; H C J Godfray
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Plant invasions and extinction debts.

Authors:  Benjamin Gilbert; Jonathan M Levine
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Exotic plant invasions under enhanced rainfall are constrained by soil nutrients and competition.

Authors:  Anu Eskelinen; Susan Harrison
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 5.499

8.  Inherited fungal symbionts enhance establishment of an invasive annual grass across successional habitats.

Authors:  Andrea Uchitel; Marina Omacini; Enrique J Chaneton
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Testing the Amazon savannization hypothesis: fire effects on invasion of a neotropical forest by native cerrado and exotic pasture grasses.

Authors:  Divino V Silvério; Paulo M Brando; Jennifer K Balch; Francis E Putz; Daniel C Nepstad; Claudinei Oliveira-Santos; Mercedes M C Bustamante
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Bacterial endophytes enhance competition by invasive plants.

Authors:  Marnie E Rout; Thomas H Chrzanowski; Tara K Westlie; Thomas H DeLuca; Ragan M Callaway; William E Holben
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 3.844

View more
  11 in total

1.  New pasture plants pose weed risk.

Authors:  Don Driscoll; Jane Catford
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Reply to Proença et al.: Sown biodiverse pastures are not a universal solution to invasion risk.

Authors:  Don A Driscoll; Jane A Catford; Jacob N Barney; Philip E Hulme; Tara G Martin; Aníbal Pauchard; Petr Pyšek; David M Richardson; Sophie Riley; Vernon Visser
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Highly productive sown biodiverse pastures with low invasion risk.

Authors:  Vânia Proença; Carlos Aguiar; Tiago Domingos
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Setting Priorities for Monitoring and Managing Non-native Plants: Toward a Practical Approach.

Authors:  Christiane Koch; Jonathan M Jeschke; Gerhard E Overbeck; Johannes Kollmann
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 3.266

5.  Naturalization of European plants on other continents: The role of donor habitats.

Authors:  Veronika Kalusová; Milan Chytrý; Mark van Kleunen; Ladislav Mucina; Wayne Dawson; Franz Essl; Holger Kreft; Jan Pergl; Patrick Weigelt; Marten Winter; Petr Pyšek
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Spatial pattern of invasion and the evolutionary responses of native plant species.

Authors:  Gisela C Stotz; Ernesto Gianoli; James F Cahill
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2016-07-17       Impact factor: 5.183

7.  A Comparative Nitrogen Balance and Productivity Analysis of Legume and Non-legume Supported Cropping Systems: The Potential Role of Biological Nitrogen Fixation.

Authors:  Pietro P M Iannetta; Mark Young; Johann Bachinger; Göran Bergkvist; Jordi Doltra; Rafael J Lopez-Bellido; Michele Monti; Valentini A Pappa; Moritz Reckling; Cairistiona F E Topp; Robin L Walker; Robert M Rees; Christine A Watson; Euan K James; Geoffrey R Squire; Graham S Begg
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 5.753

8.  Lack of Impacts during Early Establishment Highlights a Short-Term Management Window for Minimizing Invasions from Perennial Biomass Crops.

Authors:  Natalie M West; David P Matlaga; Ranjan Muthukrishnan; Greg Spyreas; Nicholas R Jordan; James D Forester; Adam S Davis
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 5.753

9.  Introduced species that overcome life history tradeoffs can cause native extinctions.

Authors:  Jane A Catford; Michael Bode; David Tilman
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Economic use of plants is key to their naturalization success.

Authors:  Mark van Kleunen; Xinyi Xu; Qiang Yang; Noëlie Maurel; Zhijie Zhang; Wayne Dawson; Franz Essl; Holger Kreft; Jan Pergl; Petr Pyšek; Patrick Weigelt; Dietmar Moser; Bernd Lenzner; Trevor S Fristoe
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.