| Literature DB >> 22039490 |
Nuno Carinhas1, Aaron Mark Robitaille, Suzette Moes, Manuel José Teixeira Carrondo, Paul Jenoe, Rui Oliveira, Paula Marques Alves.
Abstract
Baculovirus infection of Spodoptera frugiperda cells is a system of choice to produce a range of recombinant proteins, vaccines and, potentially, gene therapy vectors. While baculovirus genomes are well characterized, the genome of S. frugiperda is not sequenced and the virus-host molecular interplay is sparsely known. Herein, we describe the application of stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture (SILAC) to obtain the first comparative proteome quantitation of S. frugiperda cells during growth and early baculovirus infection. The proteome coverage was maximized by compiling a search database with protein annotations from insect species. Of interest were differentially proteins related to energy metabolism, endoplasmic reticulum and oxidative stress, yet not investigated in the scope of baculovirus infection. Further, the reduced expression of key viral-encoded proteins early in the infection cycle is suggested to be related with decreased viral replication at high cell density culture. These findings have implications for virological research and improvement of baculovirus-based bioprocesses.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22039490 PMCID: PMC3196586 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026444
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Schematic representation of the SILAC experimental design.
For each comparison, cells maintained in unlabeled medium and medium labeled with heavy Arg (“Arg 6”) and heavy Lys (“Lys 8”) were grown to the desired cell density (CD) and infected (CDI) when appropriate. Protein extracts were mixed in equal amounts and subject to further processing until LC-MS/MS analysis.
Figure 2Species distribution and classification of the Sf9 proteome.
(A) A total of 648 protein hits were retrieved from an insect subset of the NCBI non–redundant database. Due to high interspecies homology, some hits correspond to the same protein identified from different organisms. An estimated 56% correspond to unique PIRSF designations, indicating approximately 361 different Sf9 proteins. (B) (C) (D) Proteome classification according to the gene ontology (GO) vocabulary. A total of 48 Component, 105 Process and 38 Function terms were manually retrieved from the online resource iProClass. The 15 most abundant terms in each class are shown. As each protein is generally assigned to more than one term, the percentage of proteins in each term is shown instead of total number to avoid redundancy.
Figure 3Correction and statistical analysis of SILAC ratios based on suboptimal label incorporation.
(A) The proteome enrichment with heavy Arg and Lys was monitored after 21 and 24 cell duplications by analyzing unmixed protein extracts from labeled cultures. (B) Flow chart of the data analysis methodology. Briefly, protein isotope ratios directly obtained from LC-MS/MS analysis of 1∶1 mixed labeled/unlabeled cultures (R) are corrected in a protein-specific manner with the respective isotope enrichment ratios (Ri). The resulting set of corrected SILAC ratios (Rc) reflecting differential expression within each experimental comparison is symmetrized by logarithmic transformation and fitted with a Gaussian curve. In parallel, the unbiased standard deviations (S.D.) from triplicate experiments of R and Ri are propagated into standard deviations of Rc. Data distributions are then constructed by filtering out ratios with S.D. (ln Rc) values larger than 1 or 0.5, yielding more focused Gaussian fittings. For each distribution, differentially expressed proteins are defined as being different than the average by a t-test with at least 95% confidence. The combined set of proteins arising from the 3 distributions is considered to be regulated in the particular experimental comparison. (C) Protein-specific and global correction of ratios obtained from uninfected and infected cultures at low cell density. (D) The introduction of data variability by the mathematical operation was investigated by performing a sensitivity analysis of Rc. S.D. propagation shows a correlated trend of error amplification from R and Ri into Rc. (E) Added variability in the final ln–transformed distribution of corrected ratios is substantially reduced after applying a 0.5 maximum S.D. cutoff. Equations and definitions are available in Materials and methods.
List of proteins differentially expressed along culture growth and after BV infection.
| Protein | GI number | Low CD/High CD | Inf./Uninf. (globally) | Uninf./Inf. (Low CD) | Inf./Uninf. (High CD) |
|
| 6014978 | 0.61±0.12 (5; 15.90%) | 0.72±0.10 (3; 9.26%) | ||
|
| 158291795 | 153.86±23.35 (1; 2.66%) | 153.86±23.35 (1; 2.66%) | ||
|
| 195051749 | 0.17±0.08 (1; 2.51%) | 2.85±1.07 (1; 2.51%) | ||
|
| 158291584 | 17.75±3.67 (1; 4.98%) | |||
|
| 153792270 | 20.80±4.74 (1; 4.25%) | |||
|
| 153791817 | 2.03±0.32 (2; 7.67%) | 3.32±3.50 (2; 7.67%) | 2.13±0.24 (2; 7.67%) | |
|
| 58381447 | 0.47±0.16 (1; 3.24%) | |||
|
| 224999285 | 0.09±0.14 (5; 7.13%) | 0.09±0.14 (5; 7.13%) | ||
|
| 114051868 | 3.08±0.69 (2; 7.88%) | |||
|
| 114052170 | 0.56±0.08 (5; 29.39%) | 1.79±0.25 (3; 16.73%) | ||
|
| 114053117 | 0.21±0.03 (1; 8.26%) | 4.69±0.67 (1; 8.26%) | ||
|
| 112983254 | 0.25±0.14 (1; 2.19%) | 0.25±0.14 (1; 2.19%) | ||
|
| 112982743 | 0.52±0.14 (2; 13.96%) | |||
|
| 268306392 | 1.95±0.48 (3; 6.83%) | 0.37±0.04 (3; 6.83%) | ||
|
| 125807113 | 0.31±0.03 (1; 9.36%) | 0.33±0.03 (1; 9.36%) | ||
|
| 112984274 | 1.91±0.28 (3; 35.71%) | |||
|
| 15213774 | 1.86±0.27 (5; 41.22%) | |||
|
| 52783262 | 298.06±75.72 (1; 7.74%) | 298.06±75.72 (1; 7.74%) | ||
|
| 58383567 | 1.63±0.23 (2; 23.68%) | |||
|
| 126002490 | 2.15±0.40 (2; 9.33%) | |||
|
| 16566719 | 0.52±0.11 (1; 6.17%) | |||
|
| 301070150 | 3.14±1.79 (1; 9.09%) | 0.17±0.10 (1; 9.09%) | ||
|
| 125981509 | 0.48±0.07 (5; 10.37%) | |||
|
| 112984012 | 0.60±0.13 (2; 4.10%) | |||
|
| 112983366 | 0.48±0.26 (2; 5.91%) | |||
|
| 125980516 | 3.12±0.62 (1; 2.95%) | |||
|
| 58381374 | 10.71±2.24 (1; 3.97%) | |||
|
| 125773553 | 3.57±0.80 (1; 6.95%) | |||
|
| 125811648 | 0.74±0.11 (1; 2.33%) | |||
|
| 163838692 | 0.60±0.15 (4; 21.80%) | 1.82±0.22 (1; 4.94%) | ||
|
| 17136240 | 2.60±0.24 (2; 2.87%) | |||
|
| 21355917 | 10.87±0.93 (2; 16.49%) | 21.40±3.29 (1; 7.98%) | ||
|
| 6560635 | 2.21±0.50 (1; 13.21%) | |||
|
| 24585673 | 0.36±0.15 (1; 8.87%) | |||
|
| 9630874 | 0.57±0.11 (6; 21.30%) |
Average ratios correspond to corrected SILAC ratios (Rc) and are shown for under- or over–expressed proteins with statistical significance as described in the text. The number of peptide hits used for protein identification and overall protein coverage are shown in parenthesis for each comparison. CD - cell density. Un(inf) - un(infected). Protein name abbreviations: ALDH (aldehyde dehydrogenase), CLP (calponin–like protein), EF1b (elongation factor 1b), eIF(6; 3k; 3d) (eukaryotic translation initiation factor 6; 3k; 3d), ERp57 (endoplasmic reticulum protein 57), GP (glycogen phosphorylase), GTPase (guanosine triphosphatase), H2A (histone 2A), HSC70 (70 Kda heat shock cognate protein), HSDH (hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase), HSP70-5 (70 Kda heat shock protein 5), Khc (kinesin heavy chain), LEF3 (late expression factor 3), ME (malic enzyme), Mod-he (Mod(Mdg4)–heS0053), PDH-E3 (pyruvate dehydrogenase complex, E3), PGDH (6–phosphogluconate dehydrogenase), PP1c (protein phosphatase 1c), RPL(4; 19e; 23; 26; 24) (large subunit ribosomal protein 4; 19e; 23; 26; 24), RPS(14b; 3Ae; 3) (small subunit ribosomal protein 14b; 3Ae; 3), SAHCH (S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine hydrolase), sHSP (small heat shock protein), SRP54 (signal recognition particle 54), TNFR-AP1 (tumor necrosis factor receptor associated protein 1), TRXL (thioredoxin–like protein). *viral protein detected in the comparison of infected cultures at low and high CD.
Figure 4Comparative analysis of simultaneously quantified protein in the various experimental settings.
Standardization of the ln-transformed corrected ratios was performed against the respective unfiltered distributions. Error bars presented for differentially expressed proteins correspond to propagated S.D. values from triplicate experiments. The vicinity of the average distributions is delimited by Average ± S.D. of the more focused distribution in each case (cutoff S.D. (ln Rc) = 0.5), after standardizing as above. (A) (B) Comparative analyses of 286 and 249 proteins simultaneously quantified for the treatment pairs Growth/Infection (globally) and Infection (LCD)/Infection (HCD), respectively. Proteins considered to be regulated only by one condition are highlighted so they can be easily tracked in the other condition.
Figure 5Functional organization of cellular proteins differentially expressed along culture growth and after BV infection.
Under- or over-expression imply statistical significance as described in the text. Proteins suggested to be unregulated locate within Average ± S.D of the respective distributions (cutoff S.D. (ln Rc) = 0.5). Expression ratios, number of peptide hits and protein coverage are shown in Table 1. For detailed statistical information see Tables S2, S3, S4 and S5.