Literature DB >> 22039088

PIK3CA exon 20 mutations as a potential biomarker for resistance to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies in KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

C Mao1, Z Y Yang, X F Hu, Q Chen, J L Tang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to dissect the association between PIK3CA mutations and resistance to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) according to PIK3CA exon of mutations in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).
METHODS: We systematically identified studies exploring the association between PIK3CA mutations and clinical outcomes of mCRC patients treated with anti-EGFR MoAbs. The primary clinical outcomes included objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). The pooled relative risk (RR) or hazard ratio (HR) was estimated by using fixed effect model or random effect model according to heterogeneity between studies.
RESULTS: Thirteen studies were considered eligible, with 576 mCRC patients included. In KRAS wild-type mCRC patients, we observed a lower ORR in patients with PIK3CA exon 20 mutations [3 studies, 377 patients; ORR = 0% versus 37%; RR = 0.25; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.05-1.19; P = 0.082], although the result was not statistically significant because of the small sample size. Only one study provided survival data according to the PIK3CA exon of the mutations, in which PIK3CA exon 20 mutations were statistically significantly associated with shorter PFS (HR = 2.52; 95% CI 1.33-4.78; P = 0.013) and OS (HR = 3.29; 95% CI 1.60-6.74; P = 0.006) in KRAS wild-type mCRC patients treated with anti-EGFR MoAbs. The predictive power of exon 20 mutation is greater than exon 9 mutations and all exons mutations in terms of ORR, PFS, and OS.
CONCLUSION: These analyses suggest that PIK3CA exon 20 mutations may be a potential biomarker for resistance to anti-EGFR MoAbs in KRAS wild-type mCRC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22039088     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdr464

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  88 in total

Review 1.  Prognostic role of tumor PIK3CA mutation in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Z B Mei; C Y Duan; C B Li; L Cui; S Ogino
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 32.976

2.  Analysis of PTEN, BRAF and PI3K status for determination of benefit from cetuximab therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer patients refractory to chemotherapy with wild-type KRAS.

Authors:  Deniz Tural; Sebnem Batur; Sibel Erdamar; Emre Akar; Nuray Kepil; Nil Molinas Mandel; Süheyla Serdengeçti
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2013-09-01

3.  Markers of resistance to anti-EGFR therapy in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Walid Shaib; Reena Mahajan; Bassel El-Rayes
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2013-09

4.  EGFR gene copy number as a predictive biomarker for resistance to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies in metastatic colorectal cancer treatment: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wei-Dong Shen; Hong-Lin Chen; Peng-Fei Liu
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 5.087

5.  Modeling RAS phenotype in colorectal cancer uncovers novel molecular traits of RAS dependency and improves prediction of response to targeted agents in patients.

Authors:  Justin Guinney; Charles Ferté; Jonathan Dry; Robert McEwen; Gilles Manceau; K J Kao; Kai-Ming Chang; Claus Bendtsen; Kevin Hudson; Erich Huang; Brian Dougherty; Michel Ducreux; Jean-Charles Soria; Stephen Friend; Jonathan Derry; Pierre Laurent-Puig
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 6.  Current companion diagnostics in advanced colorectal cancer; getting a bigger and better piece of the pie.

Authors:  Jonathan M Loree; Scott Kopetz; Kanwal P S Raghav
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2017-02

Review 7.  Current evidence and controversies in the incorporation of biologics for metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Kristen K Ciombor; Richard M Goldberg
Journal:  Hepat Oncol       Date:  2014-09-09

Review 8.  Molecular Biomarkers for the Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer: Guideline From the American Society for Clinical Pathology, College of American Pathologists, Association for Molecular Pathology, and American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Authors:  Antonia R Sepulveda; Stanley R Hamilton; Carmen J Allegra; Wayne Grody; Allison M Cushman-Vokoun; William K Funkhouser; Scott E Kopetz; Christopher Lieu; Noralane M Lindor; Bruce D Minsky; Federico A Monzon; Daniel J Sargent; Veena M Singh; Joseph Willis; Jennifer Clark; Carol Colasacco; R Bryan Rumble; Robyn Temple-Smolkin; Christina B Ventura; Jan A Nowak
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 5.568

9.  Aspirin use, tumor PIK3CA mutation, and colorectal-cancer survival.

Authors:  Xiaoyun Liao; Paul Lochhead; Reiko Nishihara; Teppei Morikawa; Aya Kuchiba; Mai Yamauchi; Yu Imamura; Zhi Rong Qian; Yoshifumi Baba; Kaori Shima; Ruifang Sun; Katsuhiko Nosho; Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Edward Giovannucci; Charles S Fuchs; Andrew T Chan; Shuji Ogino
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 10.  Molecular markers of prognosis and therapeutic targets in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Sean M Ronnekleiv-Kelly; Richard A Burkhart; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 3.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.