PURPOSE: KRAS wild-type status is an imperfect predictor of sensitivity to anti-EGF receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibodies in colorectal cancer, motivating efforts to identify novel molecular aberrations driving RAS. This study aimed to build a quantitative readout of RAS pathway activity to (i) uncover molecular surrogates of RAS activity specific to colorectal cancer, (ii) improve the prediction of cetuximab response in patients, and (iii) suggest new treatment strategies. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: A model of RAS pathway activity was trained in a large colorectal cancer dataset and validated in three independent colorectal cancer patient datasets. Novel molecular traits were inferred from The Cancer Genome Atlas colorectal cancer data. The ability of the RAS model to predict resistance to cetuximab was tested in mouse xenografts and three independent patient cohorts. Drug sensitivity correlations between our model and large cell line compendiums were performed. RESULTS: The performance of the RAS model was remarkably robust across three validation datasets. (i) Our model confirmed the heterogeneity of the RAS phenotype in KRAS wild-type patients, and suggests novel molecular traits driving its phenotype (e.g., MED12 loss, FBXW7 mutation, MAP2K4 mutation). (ii) It improved the prediction of response and progression-free survival (HR, 2.0; P < 0.01) to cetuximab compared with KRAS mutation (xenograft and patient cohorts). (iii) Our model consistently predicted sensitivity to MAP-ERK kinase (MEK) inhibitors (P < 0.01) in two cell panel screens. CONCLUSIONS: Modeling the RAS phenotype in colorectal cancer allows for the robust interrogation of RAS pathway activity across cell lines, xenografts, and patient cohorts. It demonstrates clinical utility in predicting response to anti-EGFR agents and MEK inhibitors.
PURPOSE:KRAS wild-type status is an imperfect predictor of sensitivity to anti-EGF receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibodies in colorectal cancer, motivating efforts to identify novel molecular aberrations driving RAS. This study aimed to build a quantitative readout of RAS pathway activity to (i) uncover molecular surrogates of RAS activity specific to colorectal cancer, (ii) improve the prediction of cetuximab response in patients, and (iii) suggest new treatment strategies. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: A model of RAS pathway activity was trained in a large colorectal cancer dataset and validated in three independent colorectal cancerpatient datasets. Novel molecular traits were inferred from The Cancer Genome Atlas colorectal cancer data. The ability of the RAS model to predict resistance to cetuximab was tested in mouse xenografts and three independent patient cohorts. Drug sensitivity correlations between our model and large cell line compendiums were performed. RESULTS: The performance of the RAS model was remarkably robust across three validation datasets. (i) Our model confirmed the heterogeneity of the RAS phenotype in KRAS wild-type patients, and suggests novel molecular traits driving its phenotype (e.g., MED12 loss, FBXW7 mutation, MAP2K4 mutation). (ii) It improved the prediction of response and progression-free survival (HR, 2.0; P < 0.01) to cetuximab compared with KRAS mutation (xenograft and patient cohorts). (iii) Our model consistently predicted sensitivity to MAP-ERK kinase (MEK) inhibitors (P < 0.01) in two cell panel screens. CONCLUSIONS: Modeling the RAS phenotype in colorectal cancer allows for the robust interrogation of RAS pathway activity across cell lines, xenografts, and patient cohorts. It demonstrates clinical utility in predicting response to anti-EGFR agents and MEK inhibitors.
Authors: Jochen Gaedcke; Marian Grade; Klaus Jung; Jordi Camps; Peter Jo; Georg Emons; Anastasia Gehoff; Ulrich Sax; Markus Schirmer; Heinz Becker; Tim Beissbarth; Thomas Ried; B Michael Ghadimi Journal: Genes Chromosomes Cancer Date: 2010-11 Impact factor: 5.006
Authors: Wendy De Roock; Derek J Jonker; Federica Di Nicolantonio; Andrea Sartore-Bianchi; Dongsheng Tu; Salvatore Siena; Simona Lamba; Sabrina Arena; Milo Frattini; Hubert Piessevaux; Eric Van Cutsem; Chris J O'Callaghan; Shirin Khambata-Ford; John R Zalcberg; John Simes; Christos S Karapetis; Alberto Bardelli; Sabine Tejpar Journal: JAMA Date: 2010-10-27 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Pierre Laurent-Puig; Anne Cayre; Gilles Manceau; Emmanuel Buc; Jean-Baptiste Bachet; Thierry Lecomte; Philippe Rougier; Astrid Lievre; Bruno Landi; Valérie Boige; Michel Ducreux; Marc Ychou; Fréderic Bibeau; Olivier Bouché; Julia Reid; Steven Stone; Frédérique Penault-Llorca Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-11-02 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Eric Van Cutsem; Claus-Henning Köhne; István Láng; Gunnar Folprecht; Marek P Nowacki; Stefano Cascinu; Igor Shchepotin; Joan Maurel; David Cunningham; Sabine Tejpar; Michael Schlichting; Angela Zubel; Ilhan Celik; Philippe Rougier; Fortunato Ciardiello Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-04-18 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Andrey Loboda; Michael Nebozhyn; Rich Klinghoffer; Jason Frazier; Michael Chastain; William Arthur; Brian Roberts; Theresa Zhang; Melissa Chenard; Brian Haines; Jannik Andersen; Kumiko Nagashima; Cloud Paweletz; Bethany Lynch; Igor Feldman; Hongyue Dai; Pearl Huang; James Watters Journal: BMC Med Genomics Date: 2010-06-30 Impact factor: 3.063
Authors: Karsten Jürchott; Ralf-Jürgen Kuban; Till Krech; Nils Blüthgen; Ulrike Stein; Wolfgang Walther; Christian Friese; Szymon M Kiełbasa; Ute Ungethüm; Per Lund; Thomas Knösel; Wolfgang Kemmner; Markus Morkel; Johannes Fritzmann; Peter M Schlag; Walter Birchmeier; Tammo Krueger; Silke Sperling; Christine Sers; Hans-Dieter Royer; Hanspeter Herzel; Reinhold Schäfer Journal: PLoS Genet Date: 2010-12-02 Impact factor: 5.917
Authors: Eric Van Cutsem; Claus-Henning Köhne; Erika Hitre; Jerzy Zaluski; Chung-Rong Chang Chien; Anatoly Makhson; Geert D'Haens; Tamás Pintér; Robert Lim; György Bodoky; Jae Kyung Roh; Gunnar Folprecht; Paul Ruff; Christopher Stroh; Sabine Tejpar; Michael Schlichting; Johannes Nippgen; Philippe Rougier Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-04-02 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: J B Baker; D Dutta; D Watson; T Maddala; B M Munneke; S Shak; E K Rowinsky; L-A Xu; C T Harbison; E A Clark; D J Mauro; S Khambata-Ford Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2011-01-04 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Benjamin A Logsdon; Andrew J Gentles; Chris P Miller; C Anthony Blau; Pamela S Becker; Su-In Lee Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2015-01-12 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Yu-Hsiu T Lin; Gregory P Way; Benjamin G Barwick; Margarette C Mariano; Makeba Marcoulis; Ian D Ferguson; Christoph Driessen; Lawrence H Boise; Casey S Greene; Arun P Wiita Journal: Blood Adv Date: 2019-11-12
Authors: Neeraj Lal; Brian S White; Ghaleb Goussous; Oliver Pickles; Mike J Mason; Andrew D Beggs; Philippe Taniere; Benjamin E Willcox; Justin Guinney; Gary W Middleton Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2017-10-23 Impact factor: 12.531