Literature DB >> 22038397

Characteristics and quality of pediatric cost-utility analyses.

Seija K Kromm1, Jennifer Bethell, Ferne Kraglund, Sarah A Edwards, Audrey Laporte, Peter C Coyte, Wendy J Ungar.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Measuring utility for cost-utility analysis (CUA) is challenging in children. The objectives were to characterize pediatric CUAs, appraise their quality, and identify determinants of higher quality.
METHODS: Descriptive data were imported from the PEDE database for 305 pediatric CUAs published from 1997 to 2009, and quality was rated using the Pediatric Quality Appraisal Questionnaire (PQAQ) in 213 studies. The impact on quality of publication year, journal type, and whether utility was measured was analyzed using multiple regression.
RESULTS: CUAs increased over time and the largest proportion was from North America (38%). Children aged 1-12 years (39%) and preventative interventions (51%) were studied most frequently. Whereas a societal perspective was most common in papers published before 2007 (49%), a third-party payer perspective was subsequently most frequent (63%). Utility was measured prospectively in 8% of studies. Domains that demonstrated the poorest quality were Perspective, Costs and resource use, Outcomes, Analysis, Incremental analysis and Conflict of interest. Quality increased significantly over time for most domains and was greater in studies published in methods/health economic journals.
CONCLUSIONS: The quality of pediatric CUAs is increasing. Few studies ascertain utility prospectively, suggesting the need for better instruments for pediatric health state valuation and measurement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22038397     DOI: 10.1007/s11136-011-0049-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  30 in total

1.  The Pediatric Quality Appraisal Questionnaire: an instrument for evaluation of the pediatric health economics literature.

Authors:  Wendy J Ungar; Maria T Santos
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.725

2.  Can we better prioritize resources for cost-utility research?

Authors:  Peter J Neumann; Allison B Rosen; Dan Greenberg; Natalia V Olchanski; Richa Pande; Richard H Chapman; Patricia W Stone; Silvia Ondategui-Parra; John Nadai; Joanna E Siegel; Milton C Weinstein
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.583

3.  Working with children to develop dimensions for a preference-based, generic, pediatric, health-related quality-of-life measure.

Authors:  Katherine J Stevens
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2010-01-06

4.  Reliability of two instruments for critical assessment of economic evaluations.

Authors:  Flora Au; Shirlina Prahardhi; Alan Shiell
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.725

5.  The ISPOR Good Practices for Quality Improvement of Cost-Effectiveness Research Task Force Report.

Authors:  William F McGhan; Maiwenn Al; Jalpa A Doshi; Isao Kamae; Steven E Marx; Donna Rindress
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2009-09-10       Impact factor: 5.725

6.  A qualitative analysis of a dyad approach to health-related quality of life measurement in children with asthma.

Authors:  Wendy J Ungar; Cara Mirabelli; Martha Cousins; Katherine M Boydell
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2006-08-02       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  Estimating preference-based health utilities index mark 3 utility scores for childhood conditions in England and Scotland.

Authors:  Stavros Petrou; Emil Kupek
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 2.583

8.  How robust is the Health Utilities Index Mark 2 utility function?

Authors:  Qinan Wang; William Furlong; David Feeny; George Torrance; Ronald Barr
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 9.  A review of health utilities across conditions common in paediatric and adult populations.

Authors:  Jean-Eric Tarride; Natasha Burke; Matthias Bischof; Robert B Hopkins; Linda Goeree; Kaitryn Campbell; Feng Xie; Daria O'Reilly; Ron Goeree
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 3.186

Review 10.  Health-related quality of life measurement in pediatric clinical practice: an appraisal and precept for future research and application.

Authors:  James W Varni; Tasha M Burwinkle; Mariella M Lane
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2005-05-16       Impact factor: 3.186

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  A Review of the Development and Application of Generic Multi-Attribute Utility Instruments for Paediatric Populations.

Authors:  Gang Chen; Julie Ratcliffe
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Review of Valuation Methods of Preference-Based Measures of Health for Economic Evaluation in Child and Adolescent Populations: Where are We Now and Where are We Going?

Authors:  Donna Rowen; Oliver Rivero-Arias; Nancy Devlin; Julie Ratcliffe
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Mapping scores from the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) to preference-based utility values.

Authors:  Gareth Furber; Leonie Segal; Matthew Leach; Jane Cocks
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Measuring Health Utilities in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Dominic Thorrington; Ken Eames
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Health state utility values among children and adolescents with disabilities: protocol for a systematic review.

Authors:  Lucy Kanya; Nana Anokye; Jennifer M Ryan
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 6.  Preference-based measures to obtain health state utility values for use in economic evaluations with child-based populations: a review and UK-based focus group assessment of patient and parent choices.

Authors:  Jane L Wolstenholme; Danielle Bargo; Kay Wang; Anthony Harnden; Ulla Räisänen; Lucy Abel
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Methodological challenges surrounding QALY estimation for paediatric economic evaluation.

Authors:  Stavros Petrou
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2022-03-03

8.  Showing Value in Newborn Screening: Challenges in Quantifying the Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Early Detection of Phenylketonuria and Cystic Fibrosis.

Authors:  Scott D Grosse
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2015-11-11

9.  Cost-effectiveness of Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-Cell therapy in pediatric relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. A societal view.

Authors:  Frederick W Thielen; Annemieke van Dongen-Leunis; Alexander M M Arons; Judith R Ladestein; Peter M Hoogerbrugge; Carin A Uyl-de Groot
Journal:  Eur J Haematol       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 2.997

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.