Literature DB >> 16887248

A qualitative analysis of a dyad approach to health-related quality of life measurement in children with asthma.

Wendy J Ungar1, Cara Mirabelli, Martha Cousins, Katherine M Boydell.   

Abstract

The measurement of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in children often relies on parents as proxy respondents. Yet, several studies have shown poor to moderate correlations between parent and child responses, questioning the validity of the parent as proxy. This qualitative study examined a dyad approach, where parent and child were interviewed together. The objective was to observe and describe the interaction in a dyad interview, wherein both parent and child perspectives are used and where the parent may expand the child's cognitive abilities to create a more meaningful description of the child's HRQOL. Children aged 8-15 years with a clinical diagnosis of asthma and their primary caregivers were recruited from The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada. The dyads were administered the Health Utilities Index Mark II/III, the Pediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire and the PedsQL Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory. Interviews were audio-taped and a second researcher recorded observations. Consistent with Grounded Theory methodology, observations were indexed according to categories and subcategories related to the response process. Data were analysed using open, axial and selective coding and constant comparison. Saturation was achieved at 16 dyad interviews. A cultural review and reflexive role taking were included to minimize interviewer bias and enhance rigour. Findings were grouped in the following 11 themes: recall difficulty, respondent bias, interviewer bias, frustration, coercion/parental influence, inter-relational conflict, psychic discomfort for health states, emotional sensitivity, parent as advocate, parent as enabler and comprehension. The specification of these categories facilitated the creation of an interview guide to accompany the administration of standardized HRQOL questionnaires to parent-child dyads. Such a guide would facilitate discussion between parent and child and enhance the consistency of the interview process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16887248      PMCID: PMC4931915          DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.06.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  24 in total

1.  Measuring quality of life in children with asthma.

Authors:  E F Juniper; G H Guyatt; D H Feeny; P J Ferrie; L E Griffith; M Townsend
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 2.  Quality of life: what is it? How should it be measured?

Authors:  N K Aaronson
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 2.990

3.  PedsQL 4.0: reliability and validity of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory version 4.0 generic core scales in healthy and patient populations.

Authors:  J W Varni; M Seid; P S Kurtin
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Sample size in qualitative research.

Authors:  M Sandelowski
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 2.228

5.  Methodology in behavioral and psychosocial cancer research. Conceptualizing disease impact and treatment outcomes.

Authors:  J E Ware
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1984-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Assessment of childhood depression: correspondence of child and parent ratings.

Authors:  A E Kazdin; N H French; A S Unis; K Esveldt-Dawson
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Psychiatry       Date:  1983-03

7.  Minimum skills required by children to complete health-related quality of life instruments for asthma: comparison of measurement properties.

Authors:  E F Juniper; G H Guyatt; D H Feeny; L E Griffith; P J Ferrie
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 16.671

8.  The PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scales: sensitivity, responsiveness, and impact on clinical decision-making.

Authors:  James W Varni; Michael Seid; Tara Smith Knight; Karen Uzark; Ilona S Szer
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2002-04

9.  Methodological challenges in assessing children's mental health services utilization.

Authors:  Glorisa Canino; Partrick E Shrout; Margarita Alegría; Maritza Rubio-Stipec; Ligia M Chávez; Julio C Ribera; Milagros Bravo; José J Bauermeister; Lizbeth M Fábregas; Sally Horwitz; Alfonso Martínez-Taboas
Journal:  Ment Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-06

10.  Parent-child agreement on child psychiatric symptoms assessed via structured interview.

Authors:  C Edelbrock; A J Costello; M K Dulcan; N C Conover; R Kala
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 8.982

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Quality of life in survivors of childhood cancer: a systematic review of the literature (2001-2008).

Authors:  Janette McDougall; Miranda Tsonis
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Characteristics and quality of pediatric cost-utility analyses.

Authors:  Seija K Kromm; Jennifer Bethell; Ferne Kraglund; Sarah A Edwards; Audrey Laporte; Peter C Coyte; Wendy J Ungar
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Challenges in health state valuation in paediatric economic evaluation: are QALYs contraindicated?

Authors:  Wendy J Ungar
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Using structural equation modeling to understand child and parent perceptions of asthma quality of life.

Authors:  Robert D Annett; Charles Turner; Janet L Brody; Donna Sedillo; Jeanne Dalen
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  2009-12-21

5.  A parent-child dyad approach to the assessment of health status and health-related quality of life in children with asthma.

Authors:  Wendy J Ungar; Katherine Boydell; Sharon Dell; Brian M Feldman; Deborah Marshall; Andrew Willan; James G Wright
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Agreement was not found in adolescents' quality of life rated by parents and adolescents.

Authors:  I-Chan Huang; Elizabeth A Shenkman; Walter Leite; Caprice A Knapp; Lindsay A Thompson; Dennis A Revicki
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 6.437

7.  Parent-proxy and child self-reported health-related quality of life: using qualitative methods to explain the discordance.

Authors:  Elise Davis; Caroline Nicolas; Elizabeth Waters; Kay Cook; Lisa Gibbs; Angela Gosch; Ulrike Ravens-Sieberer
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-03-10       Impact factor: 3.440

Review 8.  Tools used for evaluation of Brazilian children's quality of life.

Authors:  João Gabriel S Souza; Marcela Antunes Pamponet; Tamirys Caroline S Souza; Alessandra Ribeiro Pereira; Andrey George S Souza; Andréa Maria E de B L Martins
Journal:  Rev Paul Pediatr       Date:  2014-06

9.  Measuring adolescents' HRQoL via self reports and parent proxy reports: an evaluation of the psychometric properties of both versions of the KINDL-R instrument.

Authors:  Michael Erhart; Ute Ellert; Bärbel-Maria Kurth; Ulrike Ravens-Sieberer
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 3.186

10.  Psychometric assessment of the Injection Pen Assessment Questionnaire (IPAQ): measuring ease of use and preference with injection pens for human growth hormone.

Authors:  Andreas M Pleil; Miriam Kimel; Julie McCormack; Natasa Rajicic; Judith Hey-Hadavi
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 3.186

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.