Literature DB >> 22037889

Medication administration quality and health information technology: a national study of US hospitals.

Ajit Appari1, Emily K Carian, M Eric Johnson, Denise L Anthony.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the use of computerized physician order entry (CPOE) and electronic medication administration records (eMAR) is associated with better quality of medication administration at medium-to-large acute-care hospitals. DATA/STUDY
SETTING: A retrospective cross-sectional analysis of data from three sources: CPOE/eMAR usage from HIMSS Analytics (2010), medication quality scores from CMS Hospital Compare (2010), and hospital characteristics from CMS Acute Inpatient Prospective Payment System (2009). The analysis focused on 11 quality indicators (January-December 2009) at 2603 medium-to-large (≥ 100 beds), non-federal acute-care hospitals measuring proportion of eligible patients given (or prescribed) recommended medications for conditions, including acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, and pneumonia, and surgical care improvement. Using technology adoption by 2008 as reference, hospitals were coded: (1) eMAR-only adopters (n=986); (2) CPOE-only adopters (n=115); and (3) adopters of both technologies (n=804); with non-adopters of both technologies as reference group (n=698). Hospitals were also coded for duration of use in 2-year increments since technology adoption. Hospital characteristics, historical measure-specific patient volume, and propensity scores for technology adoption were used to control for confounding factors. The analysis was performed using a generalized linear model (logit link and binomial family). PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: Relative to non-adopters of both eMAR and CPOE, the odds of adherence to all measures (except one) were higher by 14-29% for eMAR-only hospitals and by 13-38% for hospitals with both technologies, translating to a marginal increase of 0.4-2.0 percentage points. Further, each additional 2 years of technology use was associated with 6-15% higher odds of compliance on all medication measures for eMAR-only hospitals and users of both technologies.
CONCLUSIONS: Implementation and duration of use of health information technologies are associated with improved adherence to medication guidelines at US hospitals. The benefits are evident for adoption of eMAR systems alone and in combination with CPOE.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22037889      PMCID: PMC3341782          DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000289

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  47 in total

1.  Meaningful use of computerized prescriber order entry.

Authors:  David Classen; David W Bates; Charles R Denham
Journal:  J Patient Saf       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.844

Review 2.  Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Amit X Garg; Neill K J Adhikari; Heather McDonald; M Patricia Rosas-Arellano; P J Devereaux; Joseph Beyene; Justina Sam; R Brian Haynes
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-03-09       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Factors influencing health information system adoption in American hospitals.

Authors:  Bill B Wang; Thomas T H Wan; Darrell E Burke; Gloria J Bazzoli; Blossom Y J Lin
Journal:  Health Care Manage Rev       Date:  2005 Jan-Mar

4.  Care in U.S. hospitals--the Hospital Quality Alliance program.

Authors:  Ashish K Jha; Zhonghe Li; E John Orav; Arnold M Epstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-07-21       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care.

Authors:  Basit Chaudhry; Jerome Wang; Shinyi Wu; Margaret Maglione; Walter Mojica; Elizabeth Roth; Sally C Morton; Paul G Shekelle
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2006-04-11       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Do "most wired" hospitals deliver better care?

Authors:  Feliciano Yu; Thomas K Houston
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf       Date:  2007-03

Review 7.  Medication-related clinical decision support in computerized provider order entry systems: a review.

Authors:  Gilad J Kuperman; Anne Bobb; Thomas H Payne; Anthony J Avery; Tejal K Gandhi; Gerard Burns; David C Classen; David W Bates
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2006-10-26       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  Volume standards for high-risk surgical procedures: potential benefits of the Leapfrog initiative.

Authors:  J D Birkmeyer; E V Finlayson; C M Birkmeyer
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors.

Authors:  Ross Koppel; Joshua P Metlay; Abigail Cohen; Brian Abaluck; A Russell Localio; Stephen E Kimmel; Brian L Strom
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-03-09       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Effect of computerized physician order entry and a team intervention on prevention of serious medication errors.

Authors:  D W Bates; L L Leape; D J Cullen; N Laird; L A Petersen; J M Teich; E Burdick; M Hickey; S Kleefield; B Shea; M Vander Vliet; D L Seger
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-10-21       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  15 in total

1.  EHR Adoption and Hospital Performance: Time-Related Effects.

Authors:  Julia Adler-Milstein; Jordan Everson; Shoou-Yih D Lee
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  The effect of information technology on hospital performance.

Authors:  Cynthia Williams; Yara Asi; Amanda Raffenaud; Matt Bagwell; Ibrahim Zeini
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2015-05-28

3.  Does participation in health information exchange improve hospital efficiency?

Authors:  Daniel M Walker
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2017-02-24

4.  Variation in medication use in cancer patients at the end of life: a cross-sectional analysis.

Authors:  N J H Raijmakers; L van Zuylen; C J Furst; M Beccaro; L Maiorana; P Pilastri; C Rossi; G Flego; A van der Heide; M Costantini
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-10-14       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Meaningful use of electronic health record systems and process quality of care: evidence from a panel data analysis of U.S. acute-care hospitals.

Authors:  Ajit Appari; M Eric Johnson; Denise L Anthony
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Processes and outcomes of developing a continuity of care document for use as a personal health record by people living with HIV/AIDS in New York City.

Authors:  Peter Gordon; Eli Camhi; Ron Hesse; Michelle Odlum; Rebecca Schnall; Martha Rodriguez; Esmerlin Valdez; Suzanne Bakken
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 4.046

Review 7.  Review of information technology for surgical patient care.

Authors:  Jamie R Robinson; Hannah Huth; Gretchen P Jackson
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 2.192

Review 8.  Implementing a strategy for monitoring inpatient antimicrobial use among hospitals in the United States.

Authors:  Scott K Fridkin; Arjun Srinivasan
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 9.079

9.  Potential drug related problems detected by electronic expert support system in patients with multi-dose drug dispensing.

Authors:  Hammar Tora; Hovstadius Bo; Lidström Bodil; Petersson Göran; Eiermann Birgit
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2014-06-29

10.  Effect of a centralized prescription network on inappropriate prescriptions for opioid analgesics and benzodiazepines.

Authors:  Colin R Dormuth; Tarita A Miller; Anjie Huang; Muhammad M Mamdani; David N Juurlink
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 8.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.