Hong Li1, Ali Hosseini, Jing-Sheng Li, Thomas J Gill, Guoan Li. 1. Bioengineering Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St., GRJ 1215, Boston, MA 02114 , USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To analyze the morphological change in the cartilage of the knee after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury by comparing with that of the intact contralateral knee. METHODS: A total of 22 participants (12 male and 10 female patients) who had unilateral ACL injury underwent MRI scan of both the injured and intact contralateral knees. Sagittal plane images were segmented using a modeling software to determine cartilage volume and cartilage thickness in each part of the knee cartilage that were compared between the ACL-injured and the intact contralateral knees. Furthermore, the male and female patients' data were analyzed in subgroups. RESULTS: The ACL-injured knees had statistically significant lower total knee cartilage volume than the intact contralateral knees (P = 0.0020), but had similar mean thickness of total knee cartilage (not significant: n.s.). In the male subgroup, there was no significant difference in cartilage volume and thickness between normal and ACL-injured knees. In the female subgroup, the ACL-injured knees demonstrated statistically significant difference in total knee cartilage volume (P = 0.0004) and thickness (P = 0.0024) compared with the normal knees. The percentage change in the cartilage thickness in women was significantly greater than that in men. CONCLUSION: Cartilage volume was significantly smaller in the ACL-injured knees than in the contralateral intact knees in this cohort. Women tended to display greater cartilage volume and thickness change after ACL injury than men. These findings indicated that women might be more susceptible to cartilage alteration after ACL injuries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
PURPOSE: To analyze the morphological change in the cartilage of the knee after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury by comparing with that of the intact contralateral knee. METHODS: A total of 22 participants (12 male and 10 female patients) who had unilateral ACL injury underwent MRI scan of both the injured and intact contralateral knees. Sagittal plane images were segmented using a modeling software to determine cartilage volume and cartilage thickness in each part of the knee cartilage that were compared between the ACL-injured and the intact contralateral knees. Furthermore, the male and female patients' data were analyzed in subgroups. RESULTS: The ACL-injured knees had statistically significant lower total knee cartilage volume than the intact contralateral knees (P = 0.0020), but had similar mean thickness of total knee cartilage (not significant: n.s.). In the male subgroup, there was no significant difference in cartilage volume and thickness between normal and ACL-injured knees. In the female subgroup, the ACL-injured knees demonstrated statistically significant difference in total knee cartilage volume (P = 0.0004) and thickness (P = 0.0024) compared with the normal knees. The percentage change in the cartilage thickness in women was significantly greater than that in men. CONCLUSION:Cartilage volume was significantly smaller in the ACL-injured knees than in the contralateral intact knees in this cohort. Women tended to display greater cartilage volume and thickness change after ACL injury than men. These findings indicated that women might be more susceptible to cartilage alteration after ACL injuries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
Authors: Alexander A Theologis; Daniel Kuo; Jonathan Cheng; Radu I Bolbos; Julio Carballido-Gamio; C Benjamin Ma; Xiaojuan Li Journal: Arthroscopy Date: 2010-10-29 Impact factor: 4.772
Authors: Guoan Li; Sang Eun Park; Louis E DeFrate; Matthew E Schutzer; Lunan Ji; Thomas J Gill; Harry E Rubash Journal: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 2.063
Authors: Guoan Li; Jeremy M Moses; Ramprasad Papannagari; Neil P Pathare; Louis E DeFrate; Thomas J Gill Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: F Eckstein; S Maschek; W Wirth; M Hudelmaier; W Hitzl; B Wyman; M Nevitt; M-P Hellio Le Graverand Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2008-06-02 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Eziamaka C Okafor; Gangadhar M Utturkar; Margaret R Widmyer; Ermias S Abebe; Amber T Collins; Dean C Taylor; Charles E Spritzer; C T Moorman; William E Garrett; Louis E DeFrate Journal: J Biomech Date: 2013-10-19 Impact factor: 2.712
Authors: Xinyang Wang; Yuanyuan Wang; Kim L Bennell; Tim V Wrigley; Flavia M Cicuttini; Karine Fortin; David J Saxby; Ans Van Ginckel; Alasdair R Dempsey; Nicole Grigg; Christopher Vertullo; Julian A Feller; Tim Whitehead; David G Lloyd; Adam L Bryant Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2015-10-27 Impact factor: 4.342