Literature DB >> 22037710

Scanned proton radiotherapy for mobile targets-the effectiveness of re-scanning in the context of different treatment planning approaches and for different motion characteristics.

Antje-Christin Knopf1, Theodore S Hong, Antony Lomax.   

Abstract

The most advanced delivery technique for proton radiotherapy is active spot scanning. So far, predominantly static targets have been treated with active spot scanning, since mobile targets in combination with dynamic treatment delivery can lead to interplay effects, causing inhomogeneous dose distributions. One way to mitigate motion effects is re-scanning. In this study we investigate the effectiveness of re-scanning in relation to different plan parameters (number of fields, field directions, number of re-scans) as well as in respect to different motion parameters (motion amplitude, motion starting phase). A systematic study was performed for three liver patients, for which ten different plans have been calculated, respectively. The treatment plans were evaluated for three different scenarios (static, motion/single-scan-delivery, motion/re-scanned-delivery). The choice of motion parameters was based on an evaluation of the 4D CT data sets of the three patients. It is shown that the effect of motion/re-scanning per fraction is largest the fewer fields per plan are used and the more the field direction differs from the main motion direction. For amplitudes up to 6 mm, re-scanning may not be required if multiple fields are used, since only dose blurring effects appear that cannot be compensated by re-scanning. For larger motion amplitudes two planning strategies are proposed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22037710     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/22/016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  40 in total

1.  Motion mitigation for lung cancer patients treated with active scanning proton therapy.

Authors:  Clemens Grassberger; Stephen Dowdell; Greg Sharp; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Effect of secondary particles on image quality of dynamic flat panels in carbon ion scanning beam treatment.

Authors:  S Mori; S Amano; T Furukawa; T Shirai; K Noda
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 3.  Treatment planning optimisation in proton therapy.

Authors:  S E McGowan; N G Burnet; A J Lomax
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  Current status and future prospects of multi-dimensional image-guided particle therapy.

Authors:  Shinichiro Mori; Silvan Zenklusen; Antje-Christin Knopf
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2013-02-19

Review 5.  Proton therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: Current knowledges and future perspectives.

Authors:  Gyu Sang Yoo; Jeong Il Yu; Hee Chul Park
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-07-28       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Reducing Dose Uncertainty for Spot-Scanning Proton Beam Therapy of Moving Tumors by Optimizing the Spot Delivery Sequence.

Authors:  Heng Li; X Ronald Zhu; Xiaodong Zhang
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 7.  Empowering Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Through Physics and Technology: An Overview.

Authors:  Radhe Mohan; Indra J Das; Clifton C Ling
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Four-dimensional Monte Carlo simulations demonstrating how the extent of intensity-modulation impacts motion effects in proton therapy lung treatments.

Authors:  Stephen Dowdell; Clemens Grassberger; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Impact of Spot Size and Spacing on the Quality of Robustly Optimized Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Plans for Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Chenbin Liu; Steven E Schild; Joe Y Chang; Zhongxing Liao; Shawn Korte; Jiajian Shen; Xiaoning Ding; Yanle Hu; Yixiu Kang; Sameer R Keole; Terence T Sio; William W Wong; Narayan Sahoo; Martin Bues; Wei Liu
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Interplay effects in proton scanning for lung: a 4D Monte Carlo study assessing the impact of tumor and beam delivery parameters.

Authors:  S Dowdell; C Grassberger; G C Sharp; H Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.