Literature DB >> 22030448

Dynamic in vivo glenohumeral kinematics during scapular plane abduction in healthy shoulders.

Keisuke Matsuki1, Kei O Matsuki, Satoshi Yamaguchi, Nobuyasu Ochiai, Takahisa Sasho, Hiroyuki Sugaya, Tomoaki Toyone, Yuichi Wada, Kazuhisa Takahashi, Scott A Banks.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study.
OBJECTIVES: To measure superior/inferior translation and external rotation of the humerus relative to the scapula during scapular plane abduction using 3-D/2-D model image registration techniques.
BACKGROUND: Kinematic changes in the glenohumeral joint, including excessive superior translation of the humeral head and inadequate external rotation of the humerus, are believed to be a possible cause of shoulder impingement. Although many researchers have analyzed glenohumeral kinematics with various methods, few articles have assessed dynamic in vivo glenohumeral motion.
METHODS: Twelve healthy males with a mean age of 32 years (range, 27-36 years) were enrolled in this study. Fluoroscopic images of the dominant shoulder during scapular plane elevation were taken, and computed tomography-derived 3-D bone models were matched with the silhouette of the bones in the fluoroscopic images using 3-D/2-D model image registration techniques. The kinematics of the humerus relative to the scapula were determined using Euler angles.
RESULTS: On average, there was 2.1 mm of initial humeral translation in the superior direction from the starting position to 105° of humeral elevation. Subsequently, an average of 0.9 mm of translation in the inferior direction occurred between 105° and maximum arm elevation. The average amount of external rotation of the humerus was 14° from the starting position to 60° of humeral elevation. The humerus then rotated internally an average 9° by the time the shoulder reached maximum elevation. These changes in superior/inferior translation and external/internal rotation were statistically significant (P<.001 and P = .001, respectively), based on 1-way repeated-measures analysis of variance.
CONCLUSION: The observed glenohumeral translations and rotations characterize healthy shoulder function and serve as a preliminary foundation for quantifying pathomechanics in the presence of glenohumeral joint disorders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22030448     DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2012.3584

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 0190-6011            Impact factor:   4.751


  12 in total

1.  Shoulder motion during tennis serve: dynamic and radiological evaluation based on motion capture and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Caecilia Charbonnier; Sylvain Chagué; Frank C Kolo; Alexandre Lädermann
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2014-12-14       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Comparison of dynamics in 3D glenohumeral position between primary dislocated shoulders and contralateral healthy shoulders.

Authors:  Doo Sup Kim; Bonggun Lee; Scott A Banks; Kyungjin Hong; Young Hwan Jang
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2017-01-07

3.  In vivo kinematic analysis of the glenohumeral joint during dynamic full axial rotation and scapular plane full abduction in healthy shoulders.

Authors:  Naoya Kozono; Takamitsu Okada; Naohide Takeuchi; Satoshi Hamai; Hidehiko Higaki; Satoru Ikebe; Takeshi Shimoto; Go Miake; Yoshitaka Nakanishi; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Validation of single-plane fluoroscopy and 2D/3D shape-matching for quantifying shoulder complex kinematics.

Authors:  Rebekah L Lawrence; Arin M Ellingson; Paula M Ludewig
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 2.242

5.  Beyond Euler/Cardan analysis: True glenohumeral axial rotation during arm elevation and rotation.

Authors:  Klevis Aliaj; K Bo Foreman; Peter N Chalmers; Heath B Henninger
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2021-05-08       Impact factor: 2.746

6.  Does surgery for instability of the shoulder truly stabilize the glenohumeral joint?: A prospective comparative cohort study.

Authors:  Alexandre Lädermann; Patrick J Denard; Jérôme Tirefort; Frank C Kolo; Sylvain Chagué; Grégory Cunningham; Caecilia Charbonnier
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.889

7.  Dynamic kinematics of the glenohumeral joint in shoulders with rotator cuff tears.

Authors:  Naoya Kozono; Takamitsu Okada; Naohide Takeuchi; Satoshi Hamai; Hidehiko Higaki; Takeshi Shimoto; Satoru Ikebe; Hirotaka Gondo; Yoshitaka Nakanishi; Takahiro Senju; Yasuharu Nakashima
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 2.359

8.  Three-dimensional kinematics of reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a comparison between shoulders with good or poor elevation.

Authors:  Keisuke Matsuki; Shota Hoshika; Yusuke Ueda; Morihito Tokai; Norimasa Takahashi; Hiroyuki Sugaya; Scott A Banks
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2021-03-31

9.  Immediate Effects of Angular Joint Mobilization (a New Concept of Joint Mobilization) on Pain, Range of Motion, and Disability in a Patient with Shoulder Adhesive Capsulitis: A Case Report.

Authors:  Younghoon Kim; GyuChang Lee
Journal:  Am J Case Rep       Date:  2017-02-10

10.  Translational movement within the glenohumeral joint at different rotation velocities as seen by cine MRI.

Authors:  Kazuhisa Matsui; Takashi Tachibana; Katsuya Nobuhara; Yasushi Uchiyama
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2018-03-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.