Literature DB >> 22026969

AUDocker LE: A GUI for virtual screening with AUTODOCK Vina.

Gaddam Sandeep1, Kurre Purna Nagasree, Muppaneni Hanisha, Muthyala Murali Krishna Kumar.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: AUTODOCK Vina is an open-source program which is steadfast and authentic to perform docking simulations. Though, Auto Dock Tools can help perform docking simulations with Vina, it largely remains as a platform for docking single molecule at a time.
FINDINGS: "AUDocker LE" is designed with an aim to develop a software tool as a front end graphical interface with C# language to perform docking experiments in Windows based computers. It helps users to perform automated continuous docking of large ligand databases into a set of predefined protein targets. It will also help the user to analyze the results to select promising lead molecules.
CONCLUSION: AUDocker LE provides a straight forward graphical interface which can be used in a standard personal computer with Microsoft Windows XP or Windows 7 as the operating system where Autodock Vina, Python 2.5 and .net frame work are preinstalled.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22026969      PMCID: PMC3214202          DOI: 10.1186/1756-0500-4-445

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Res Notes        ISSN: 1756-0500


Findings

AutoDock Vina [1] is one of the apt and reliable softwares available for drug discovery, molecular docking and virtual screening which was designed and implemented by Dr. Oleg Trott. Vina is offering a multi-facet capability, high performance rate and enhanced accuracy to facilitate effortless usage. This software can be operated with the help of AutoDockTools (ADT) [2] or command line instructions. Three key steps are involved in the docking simulations: 1) Preparation of protein (rigid and flexible) 2) Defining the active site (Grid) 3) Ligand preparation. Vina does not require receptor files and GRID files as input, docking of a single molecule is made easy with command line instruction but virtual screening of larger databases is possible only, if the user is familiar with shell scripting. PaDEL-ADV [3] is one of the cost-free available softwares for virtual screening with Vina, programmed on JAVA platform. Free version of VcPpt [4] software allows docking three ligands at a time. The authors could not find any open-handed software tool for docking larger database of molecules (Ligands) onto a panel of target proteins (Receptors) and determining the results. AUDocker LE (Figure 1, additional file 1) is a base software tool for windows based computers to perform docking simulations with Vina, developed with a view to solve the above discussed problems and to make the interface uncompounded and user friendly. The flowchart of the program depicts in Figure 2. User has to prepare the input files (i.e., protein rigid part, protein flexible part and ligands) required for the AUDocker LE using ADT [5] and save the protein files in one folder and Ligand files in another folder in .pdbqt format. If the ligands are in either .mol2 or .pdb format they can be converted to .pdbqt format using AUDocker LE before initiating the docking simulations. The optimized GRID box parameter is used to define the active site of the protein.
Figure 1

Snapshot of AUDocker LE.

Figure 2

Flow chart of the program AUDocker LE.

Snapshot of AUDocker LE. Flow chart of the program AUDocker LE.

Procedure

In the first step, the user has to select the protein files (rigid part) for docking using the browse button, adjacent to it (Figure 3). This opens individual windows for each protein, where the user can enter the necessary data including flexible part of the protein and the optimized grid parameters (center co-ordinates and size of the box) for the respective protein, exhaustiveness and number of output poses. In the second step, after completing the protein data entry, the folder containing all ligands has to be selected.
Figure 3

Giving the Co-ordinates and flex files to the interface.

Giving the Co-ordinates and flex files to the interface. If the ligands are in .pdb or .mol2 format, they have to be converted into .pdbqt format before initiating the docking simulations (Figure 4).
Figure 4

Convert form from PDB or .mol2 to PDBQT Format.

Convert form from PDB or .mol2 to PDBQT Format. In the last step, click the RUN tab to initiate docking. The Progress of the experiment can be visualized in the text box given against "running receptor" and "running ligand" box which will reflect data on the number of files docked and the total number of files submitted for screening. A pop up window would appear on the screen, if the experiment is completed successfully. Then the user can click "next" option to analyse of the results. The following is the methodology is used for analysis of the results. Ligand efficiency is a parameter recently introduced for selection of useful lead molecules in virtual screening of large datasets of compounds. Ligands can be compared effectively by a parameter "ligand efficiency" which can be calculated by dividing the ΔG value (dock score) obtained in the docking experiment by number of non-hydrogen atoms present in the ligand [6,7]. Ligand efficiency is calculated using the below given equation Where ΔG = RT In Kd and N is the number of non-hydrogen atoms. This helps in linking the dock score with the size of the ligand. The results are expressed as ratio of LE of compound to LE of standard as shown below: Ligand selection is based on the conditions δLE > 1 or δLE ≥ m+3σ Where m = average value of δLE for all the compounds for a given protein target σ = Standard deviation Problems involving interaction of ligands with proteins may result in false positive or false negative results. Recently a mathematical approach was successfully implemented using normalization of the results based on the following formula to solve this problem [8]. The same is implemented here for the analysis of the results obtained during docking simulations. Where V = New score value assigned to the ligand Vo = Binding energy value obtained in docking simulations ML = Average score value obtained for all the ligands for the respective protein MR = Average score values obtained for the respective ligand in all the proteins In this analysis, ligands with V value > 1 or V ≥ m+3σ were selected. Where m is the average of V values obtained for a given target protein and σ is the standard deviation. After completion of analysis, the results can be located in a folder named "tempdoc" created in the C-drive. The folders named result1, result 2, result 3 and result 4 indicate the ligands selected in δLE (> 1), δLE (≥ m+3σ), V (> 1), and V (≥ m+3σ) analysis respectively. The complete dock scores and results can be seen in the "results.mdb" file created in the C-drive, where the results were tabulated in a simple and straightforward manner to let the user, use the data for further analysis (Figure 5).
Figure 5

The tabulated results in results.mdb file.

The tabulated results in results.mdb file. A manual is also available for download along with files required for tutorial. The user is furnished with two datasets to get accustomed to the software. A dataset of 113 molecules (tutorial file 2) is obtained from the marine resources having protein kinase enzyme inhibitor activity are selected and docked against 21 kinases obtained from RCSB [9] website. The software can successfully identify potential ligands (kindly consult the tutorial file 2), in which one is considered as potential molecule for drug development [10]. Availability and requirements Project name: AUDocker LE Project homepage: https://sourceforge.net/projects/audocker/files/? Operating system: Microsoft Windows XP and Windows 7 Programming language: C# on .net framework Other requirements: Preinstallation of Python 2.5, Microsoft .net frame work, AutoDockTools (any latest version), Vina and PyMol. The user may consult manuals of ADT, .net framework and Python for successful installation and system compatibilities. License: Free to use Any restrictions to use by non-academics: None

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

GS carried out the development of the GUI, KPN contributed in the enhancement of GUI and in manuscript preparation, MH prepared databases and performed virtual screening studies and MMKK planned and coordinated the whole work. All authors read the article and approved the manuscript.

Additional file 1

AUDocker LE software and manual. Click here for file
  5 in total

1.  Ligand efficiency: a useful metric for lead selection.

Authors:  Andrew L Hopkins; Colin R Groom; Alexander Alex
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2004-05-15       Impact factor: 7.851

2.  Ligand efficiency indices as guideposts for drug discovery.

Authors:  Cele Abad-Zapatero; James T Metz
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 7.851

3.  AutoDock Vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading.

Authors:  Oleg Trott; Arthur J Olson
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2010-01-30       Impact factor: 3.376

4.  Inverse virtual screening of antitumor targets: pilot study on a small database of natural bioactive compounds.

Authors:  Gianluigi Lauro; Adriana Romano; Raffaele Riccio; Giuseppe Bifulco
Journal:  J Nat Prod       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 4.050

5.  Simplified staurosporine analogs as potent JAK3 inhibitors.

Authors:  Shyh-Ming Yang; Ravi Malaviya; Lawrence J Wilson; Rochelle Argentieri; Xin Chen; Cangming Yang; Bingbing Wang; Druie Cavender; William V Murray
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2006-10-26       Impact factor: 2.823

  5 in total
  16 in total

1.  DockingApp: a user friendly interface for facilitated docking simulations with AutoDock Vina.

Authors:  Elena Di Muzio; Daniele Toti; Fabio Polticelli
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  A rational free energy-based approach to understanding and targeting disease-causing missense mutations.

Authors:  Zhe Zhang; Shawn Witham; Marharita Petukh; Gautier Moroy; Maria Miteva; Yoshihiko Ikeguchi; Emil Alexov
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  StemCellCKB: An Integrated Stem Cell-Specific Chemogenomics KnowledgeBase for Target Identification and Systems-Pharmacology Research.

Authors:  Yu Zhang; Lirong Wang; Zhiwei Feng; Haizi Cheng; Terence Francis McGuire; Yahui Ding; Tao Cheng; Yingdai Gao; Xiang-Qun Xie
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 4.956

4.  Combined ligand-based and structure-based design of PDE 9A inhibitors against Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Rayala Swetha; Anjali Sharma; Ravi Singh; Ankit Ganeshpurkar; Devendra Kumar; Ashok Kumar; Sushil K Singh
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2022-08-06       Impact factor: 3.364

5.  Structure-based functional annotation of hypothetical proteins from Candida dubliniensis: a quest for potential drug targets.

Authors:  Kundan Kumar; Amresh Prakash; Farah Anjum; Asimul Islam; Faizan Ahmad; Md Imtaiyaz Hassan
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 2.406

6.  Redefining Cheminformatics with Intuitive Collaborative Mobile Apps.

Authors:  Alex M Clark; Sean Ekins; Antony J Williams
Journal:  Mol Inform       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 3.353

7.  Novel inhibitor discovery against aromatase through virtual screening and molecular dynamic simulation: a computational approach in drug design.

Authors:  Sako Mirzaie; Latifeh Chupani; Ebrahim Barzegari Asadabadi; Ahmad Reza Shahverdi; Mostafa Jamalan
Journal:  EXCLI J       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 4.068

8.  istar: a web platform for large-scale protein-ligand docking.

Authors:  Hongjian Li; Kwong-Sak Leung; Pedro J Ballester; Man-Hon Wong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Synthetic biology for the directed evolution of protein biocatalysts: navigating sequence space intelligently.

Authors:  Andrew Currin; Neil Swainston; Philip J Day; Douglas B Kell
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 54.564

10.  Cardiovascular Disease Chemogenomics Knowledgebase-guided Target Identification and Drug Synergy Mechanism Study of an Herbal Formula.

Authors:  Hai Zhang; Shifan Ma; Zhiwei Feng; Dongyao Wang; Chengjian Li; Yan Cao; Xiaofei Chen; Aijun Liu; Zhenyu Zhu; Junping Zhang; Guoqing Zhang; Yifeng Chai; Lirong Wang; Xiang-Qun Xie
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.