OBJECTIVE: Outcome and family history data differentiate children with severe mood dysregulation (SMD), a syndrome characterized by chronic irritability, from children with "classic" episodic bipolar disorder (BD). Nevertheless, the presence of cognitive inflexibility in SMD and BD highlights the need to delineate neurophysiologic similarities and differences between the two patient groups. Functional magnetic resonance imaging was used to examine neural correlates of cognitive flexibility deficits in patients with SMD and BD versus healthy volunteers (HV). METHOD: During functional magnetic resonance imaging, subjects completed a response reversal task that assessed cognitive flexibility (n = 22 with SMD, 26 with BD, 34 HV). Task effects were examined in four regions of interest: caudate, cingulate gyrus, inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), and ventromedial prefrontal cortex. RESULTS: Diagnosis-by-accuracy interactions emerged in the caudate and IFG. In these regions, the difference in activation was calculated between incorrect and correct trials. In the caudate, this value was smaller in subjects with SMD and with BD than in HV. In the IFG, however, this value was smaller in subjects with SMD than in those with BD and in HV. Post hoc analyses indicated that comorbid attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in patients may influence the caudate findings. Exploratory whole-brain analysis confirmed the caudate and IFG findings. In addition, other regions differentiating SMD from BD were identified (e.g., superior parietal lobule/precuneus and inferior temporal gyrus). CONCLUSIONS: In response to errors, similar perturbations occur in the caudate for youth with SMD and BD compared with HV youth. IFG deficits, in contrast, manifest in youth with SMD, but not with BD.
OBJECTIVE: Outcome and family history data differentiate children with severe mood dysregulation (SMD), a syndrome characterized by chronic irritability, from children with "classic" episodic bipolar disorder (BD). Nevertheless, the presence of cognitive inflexibility in SMD and BD highlights the need to delineate neurophysiologic similarities and differences between the two patient groups. Functional magnetic resonance imaging was used to examine neural correlates of cognitive flexibility deficits in patients with SMD and BD versus healthy volunteers (HV). METHOD: During functional magnetic resonance imaging, subjects completed a response reversal task that assessed cognitive flexibility (n = 22 with SMD, 26 with BD, 34 HV). Task effects were examined in four regions of interest: caudate, cingulate gyrus, inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), and ventromedial prefrontal cortex. RESULTS: Diagnosis-by-accuracy interactions emerged in the caudate and IFG. In these regions, the difference in activation was calculated between incorrect and correct trials. In the caudate, this value was smaller in subjects with SMD and with BD than in HV. In the IFG, however, this value was smaller in subjects with SMD than in those with BD and in HV. Post hoc analyses indicated that comorbid attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in patients may influence the caudate findings. Exploratory whole-brain analysis confirmed the caudate and IFG findings. In addition, other regions differentiating SMD from BD were identified (e.g., superior parietal lobule/precuneus and inferior temporal gyrus). CONCLUSIONS: In response to errors, similar perturbations occur in the caudate for youth with SMD and BD compared with HV youth. IFG deficits, in contrast, manifest in youth with SMD, but not with BD.
Authors: Melissa A Brotman; Layla Kassem; Michelle M Reising; Amanda E Guyer; Daniel P Dickstein; Brendan A Rich; Kenneth E Towbin; Daniel S Pine; Francis J McMahon; Ellen Leibenluft Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Ellen Leibenluft; Brendan A Rich; Deborah T Vinton; Eric E Nelson; Stephen J Fromm; Lisa H Berghorst; Paramjit Joshi; Adelaide Robb; Russell J Schachar; Daniel P Dickstein; Erin B McClure; Daniel S Pine Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Y Nagahama; T Okada; Y Katsumi; T Hayashi; H Yamauchi; C Oyanagi; J Konishi; H Fukuyama; H Shibasaki Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2001-01 Impact factor: 5.357
Authors: Brendan A Rich; Mariana Schmajuk; Koraly E Perez-Edgar; Nathan A Fox; Daniel S Pine; Ellen Leibenluft Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Daniel P Dickstein; Eric E Nelson; Erin B McCLURE; Mary E Grimley; Lisa Knopf; Melissa A Brotman; Brendan A Rich; Daniel S Pine; Ellen Leibenluft Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Eric E Nelson; Deborah T Vinton; Lisa Berghorst; Kenneth E Towbin; Rebecca E Hommer; Daniel P Dickstein; Brendan A Rich; Melissa A Brotman; Daniel S Pine; Ellen Leibenluft Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 6.744
Authors: Frank A Fishburn; Christina O Hlutkowsky; Lisa M Bemis; Theodore J Huppert; Lauren S Wakschlag; Susan B Perlman Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2018-09-11 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Lauren S Wakschlag; Susan B Perlman; R James Blair; Ellen Leibenluft; Margaret J Briggs-Gowan; Daniel S Pine Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2017-11-17 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Ryan P Cabeen; David H Laidlaw; Amanda Ruggieri; Daniel P Dickstein Journal: Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging Date: 2018-01-10 Impact factor: 2.376
Authors: Daniel P Dickstein; David Axelson; Alexandra B Weissman; Shirley Yen; Jeffrey I Hunt; Benjamin I Goldstein; Tina R Goldstein; Fangzi Liao; Mary Kay Gill; Heather Hower; Thomas W Frazier; Rasim S Diler; Eric A Youngstrom; Mary A Fristad; L Eugene Arnold; Robert L Findling; Sarah M Horwitz; Robert A Kowatch; Neal D Ryan; Michael Strober; Boris Birmaher; Martin B Keller Journal: Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2015-10-05 Impact factor: 4.785
Authors: Laura A Thomas; Melissa A Brotman; Eli J Muhrer; Brooke H Rosen; Brian L Bones; Richard C Reynolds; Christen M Deveney; Daniel S Pine; Ellen Leibenluft Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2012-12
Authors: Ellen M Kessel; Lea R Dougherty; Autumn Kujawa; Greg Hajcak; Gabrielle A Carlson; Daniel N Klein Journal: J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol Date: 2016-01-15 Impact factor: 2.576